CBS versus GLS stabilization of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations and the role of the time step as stabilization parameter.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: CBS versus GLS stabilization of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations and the role of the time step as stabilization parameter.
Authors: Codina, R.1, Zienkiewicz, O. C.2
Source: Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering. Feb2002, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p99-112. 14p. 1 Diagram.
Subjects: Galerkin methods, Numerical analysis, Navier-Stokes equations, Finite element method, Least squares
Abstract: In this work we compare two apparently different stabilization procedures for the finite element approximation of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. The first is the characteristic-based split (CBS). It combines the characteristic Galerkin method to deal with convection dominated flows with a classical splitting technique, which in some cases allows us to use equal velocity–pressure interpolations. The second approach is the Galerkin-least-squares (GLS) method, in which a least-squares form of the element residual is added to the basic Galerkin equations. It is shown that both formulations display similar stabilization mechanisms, provided the stabilization parameter of the GLS method is identified with the time step of the CBS approach. This identification can be understood from a formal Fourier analysis of the linearized problem. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 13440455
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: CBS versus GLS stabilization of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations and the role of the time step as stabilization parameter.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Codina%2C+R%2E%22">Codina, R.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zienkiewicz%2C+O%2E+C%2E%22">Zienkiewicz, O. C.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Communications+in+Numerical+Methods+in+Engineering%22">Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering</searchLink>. Feb2002, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p99-112. 14p. 1 Diagram.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Galerkin+methods%22">Galerkin methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Numerical+analysis%22">Numerical analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Navier-Stokes+equations%22">Navier-Stokes equations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Finite+element+method%22">Finite element method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Least+squares%22">Least squares</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: In this work we compare two apparently different stabilization procedures for the finite element approximation of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. The first is the characteristic-based split (CBS). It combines the characteristic Galerkin method to deal with convection dominated flows with a classical splitting technique, which in some cases allows us to use equal velocity–pressure interpolations. The second approach is the Galerkin-least-squares (GLS) method, in which a least-squares form of the element residual is added to the basic Galerkin equations. It is shown that both formulations display similar stabilization mechanisms, provided the stabilization parameter of the GLS method is identified with the time step of the CBS approach. This identification can be understood from a formal Fourier analysis of the linearized problem. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=13440455
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/cnm.470
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
        StartPage: 99
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Galerkin methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Numerical analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Navier-Stokes equations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Finite element method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Least squares
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: CBS versus GLS stabilization of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations and the role of the time step as stabilization parameter.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Codina, R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zienkiewicz, O. C.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Text: Feb2002
              Type: published
              Y: 2002
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10698299
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 18
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering
              Type: main
ResultId 1