Evolution of Test Items: From Open-ended to Multiple-Choice.
Saved in:
| Title: | Evolution of Test Items: From Open-ended to Multiple-Choice. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Sadowski, Mary A.1 msadowsk@purdue.edu, Sorby, Sheryl A.2 sheryl@mtu.edu |
| Source: | Engineering Design Graphics Journal. Spring2018, Vol. 82 Issue 2, p64-69. 6p. |
| Subjects: | Engineering graphics education, Multiple choice examinations, Test design |
| Abstract: | Grading is often a faculty member's least favorite chore, especially in engineering where open-ended problems prevail. For this reason, multiple-choice test items could be a popular alternative for assessing learning and understanding. In addition, most Learning Management Systems allow the instructor to create multiple-choice questions to be scored automatically by the system. The use of multiple-choice items in engineering graphics education could increase efficiency, allowing instructors to focus on other aspects of their teaching rather than spending significant time grading open-ended problems. The authors of the this paper have been involved in a project to develop a Concept Inventory for Engineering Graphics over the past several years. Since Concept Inventories typically consist of multiple-choice items, development of this instrument was reliant on the creation of numerous valid and reliable items. This paper will focus on the process employed in multiple-choice item creation with application to engineering graphics. The process will be illustrated through demonstration of item evolution through several iterations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Engineering Design Graphics Journal is the property of Engineering Design Graphics Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 135550677 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Evolution of Test Items: From Open-ended to Multiple-Choice. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sadowski%2C+Mary+A%2E%22">Sadowski, Mary A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> msadowsk@purdue.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sorby%2C+Sheryl+A%2E%22">Sorby, Sheryl A.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> sheryl@mtu.edu</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Engineering+Design+Graphics+Journal%22">Engineering Design Graphics Journal</searchLink>. Spring2018, Vol. 82 Issue 2, p64-69. 6p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+graphics+education%22">Engineering graphics education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multiple+choice+examinations%22">Multiple choice examinations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+design%22">Test design</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Grading is often a faculty member's least favorite chore, especially in engineering where open-ended problems prevail. For this reason, multiple-choice test items could be a popular alternative for assessing learning and understanding. In addition, most Learning Management Systems allow the instructor to create multiple-choice questions to be scored automatically by the system. The use of multiple-choice items in engineering graphics education could increase efficiency, allowing instructors to focus on other aspects of their teaching rather than spending significant time grading open-ended problems. The authors of the this paper have been involved in a project to develop a Concept Inventory for Engineering Graphics over the past several years. Since Concept Inventories typically consist of multiple-choice items, development of this instrument was reliant on the creation of numerous valid and reliable items. This paper will focus on the process employed in multiple-choice item creation with application to engineering graphics. The process will be illustrated through demonstration of item evolution through several iterations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Engineering Design Graphics Journal is the property of Engineering Design Graphics Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=135550677 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 6 StartPage: 64 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Engineering graphics education Type: general – SubjectFull: Multiple choice examinations Type: general – SubjectFull: Test design Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Evolution of Test Items: From Open-ended to Multiple-Choice. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sadowski, Mary A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sorby, Sheryl A. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Text: Spring2018 Type: published Y: 2018 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00462012 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 82 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Engineering Design Graphics Journal Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
