On the Residual Strength of Rocks and Rockmasses.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: On the Residual Strength of Rocks and Rockmasses.
Authors: Walton, G.1 (AUTHOR) gwalton@mines.edu, Labrie, D.2 (AUTHOR), Alejano, L. R.3 (AUTHOR)
Source: Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering. Nov2019, Vol. 52 Issue 11, p4821-4833. 13p.
Subjects: Rock deformation, Rocks, Crystalline rocks
Abstract: Building on the approach by Cai et al. ([13]), if the residual strength of a rockmass can be computed from a residual GSI value and this strength is similar to that of intact rock, an equivalent GSI SB I r i sb value for rock samples can be derived from residual lab intact rock strengths. Because cohesion is largely lost during the post-peak weakening phase of rock deformation due to fracture formation, residual strength is primarily controlled by the frictional properties of the rock (or rockmass) being considered (Jaeger [23]; Martin [31]). This is a clear indication that among the tested rocks, the peak to residual strength loss is significantly larger for crystalline brittle rocks than for granular more ductile rocks. This analysis revealed that although in many cases, the GSI-based model for strength degradation of Hoek et al. ([21]), first applied to the residual strength of rockmasses by Cai et al. ([13]), was capable of matching the observed residual strength data, there were several rock types for which the model-data fit was poor. [Extracted from the article]
Copyright of Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 139545406
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: On the Residual Strength of Rocks and Rockmasses.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Walton%2C+G%2E%22">Walton, G.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> gwalton@mines.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Labrie%2C+D%2E%22">Labrie, D.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Alejano%2C+L%2E+R%2E%22">Alejano, L. R.</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Rock+Mechanics+%26+Rock+Engineering%22">Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering</searchLink>. Nov2019, Vol. 52 Issue 11, p4821-4833. 13p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rock+deformation%22">Rock deformation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rocks%22">Rocks</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Crystalline+rocks%22">Crystalline rocks</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Building on the approach by Cai et al. ([13]), if the residual strength of a rockmass can be computed from a residual GSI value and this strength is similar to that of intact rock, an equivalent GSI SB I r i sb value for rock samples can be derived from residual lab intact rock strengths. Because cohesion is largely lost during the post-peak weakening phase of rock deformation due to fracture formation, residual strength is primarily controlled by the frictional properties of the rock (or rockmass) being considered (Jaeger [23]; Martin [31]). This is a clear indication that among the tested rocks, the peak to residual strength loss is significantly larger for crystalline brittle rocks than for granular more ductile rocks. This analysis revealed that although in many cases, the GSI-based model for strength degradation of Hoek et al. ([21]), first applied to the residual strength of rockmasses by Cai et al. ([13]), was capable of matching the observed residual strength data, there were several rock types for which the model-data fit was poor. [Extracted from the article]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=139545406
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00603-019-01879-5
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 13
        StartPage: 4821
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Rock deformation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Rocks
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Crystalline rocks
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: On the Residual Strength of Rocks and Rockmasses.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Walton, G.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Labrie, D.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Alejano, L. R.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2019
              Type: published
              Y: 2019
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 07232632
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 52
            – Type: issue
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering
              Type: main
ResultId 1