View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Accelerating implant RF safety assessment using a low‐rank inverse update method.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Accelerating implant RF safety assessment using a low‐rank inverse update method.
Authors: Stijnman, Peter R. S.1,2 (AUTHOR) P.R.S.Stijnman@umcutrecht.nl, Tokaya, Janot P.1 (AUTHOR), Gemert, Jeroen3,4 (AUTHOR), Luijten, Peter R.5 (AUTHOR), Pluim, Josien P. W.2 (AUTHOR), Brink, Wyger M.4 (AUTHOR), Remis, Rob F.3 (AUTHOR), Berg, Cornelis A. T.1 (AUTHOR), Raaijmakers, Alexander J. E.1,2 (AUTHOR)
Source: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. May2020, Vol. 83 Issue 5, p1796-1809. 14p.
Subjects: Radio frequency, Magnetic resonance imaging, Electric fields, Magnetic fields
Abstract: Purpose: Patients who have medical metallic implants, e.g. orthopaedic implants and pacemakers, often cannot undergo an MRI exam. One of the largest risks is tissue heating due to the radio frequency (RF) fields. The RF safety assessment of implants is computationally demanding. This is due to the large dimensions of the transmit coil compared to the very detailed geometry of an implant. Methods: In this work, we explore a faster computational method for the RF safety assessment of implants that exploits the small geometry. The method requires the RF field without an implant as a basis and calculates the perturbation that the implant induces. The inputs for this method are the incident fields and a library matrix that contains the RF field response of every edge an implant can occupy. Through a low‐rank inverse update, using the Sherman–Woodbury–Morrison matrix identity, the EM response of arbitrary implants can be computed within seconds. We compare the solution from full‐wave simulations with the results from the presented method, for two implant geometries. Results: From the comparison, we found that the resulting electric and magnetic fields are numerically equivalent (maximum error of 1.35%). However, the computation was between 171 to 2478 times faster than the corresponding GPU accelerated full‐wave simulation. Conclusions: The presented method enables for rapid and efficient evaluation of the RF fields near implants and might enable situation‐specific scanning conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 141383796
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Accelerating implant RF safety assessment using a low‐rank inverse update method.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stijnman%2C+Peter+R%2E+S%2E%22">Stijnman, Peter R. S.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> P.R.S.Stijnman@umcutrecht.nl</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tokaya%2C+Janot+P%2E%22">Tokaya, Janot P.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gemert%2C+Jeroen%22">Gemert, Jeroen</searchLink><relatesTo>3,4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Luijten%2C+Peter+R%2E%22">Luijten, Peter R.</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pluim%2C+Josien+P%2E+W%2E%22">Pluim, Josien P. W.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brink%2C+Wyger+M%2E%22">Brink, Wyger M.</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Remis%2C+Rob+F%2E%22">Remis, Rob F.</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Berg%2C+Cornelis+A%2E+T%2E%22">Berg, Cornelis A. T.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Raaijmakers%2C+Alexander+J%2E+E%2E%22">Raaijmakers, Alexander J. E.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Magnetic+Resonance+in+Medicine%22">Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</searchLink>. May2020, Vol. 83 Issue 5, p1796-1809. 14p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Radio+frequency%22">Radio frequency</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Magnetic+resonance+imaging%22">Magnetic resonance imaging</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electric+fields%22">Electric fields</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Magnetic+fields%22">Magnetic fields</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: Patients who have medical metallic implants, e.g. orthopaedic implants and pacemakers, often cannot undergo an MRI exam. One of the largest risks is tissue heating due to the radio frequency (RF) fields. The RF safety assessment of implants is computationally demanding. This is due to the large dimensions of the transmit coil compared to the very detailed geometry of an implant. Methods: In this work, we explore a faster computational method for the RF safety assessment of implants that exploits the small geometry. The method requires the RF field without an implant as a basis and calculates the perturbation that the implant induces. The inputs for this method are the incident fields and a library matrix that contains the RF field response of every edge an implant can occupy. Through a low‐rank inverse update, using the Sherman–Woodbury–Morrison matrix identity, the EM response of arbitrary implants can be computed within seconds. We compare the solution from full‐wave simulations with the results from the presented method, for two implant geometries. Results: From the comparison, we found that the resulting electric and magnetic fields are numerically equivalent (maximum error of 1.35%). However, the computation was between 171 to 2478 times faster than the corresponding GPU accelerated full‐wave simulation. Conclusions: The presented method enables for rapid and efficient evaluation of the RF fields near implants and might enable situation‐specific scanning conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=141383796
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/mrm.28023
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
        StartPage: 1796
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Radio frequency
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Magnetic resonance imaging
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Electric fields
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Magnetic fields
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Accelerating implant RF safety assessment using a low‐rank inverse update method.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stijnman, Peter R. S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tokaya, Janot P.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gemert, Jeroen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Luijten, Peter R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pluim, Josien P. W.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Brink, Wyger M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Remis, Rob F.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Berg, Cornelis A. T.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Raaijmakers, Alexander J. E.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May2020
              Type: published
              Y: 2020
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 07403194
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 83
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
              Type: main
ResultId 1