Comparison of analytical and numerical solutions for wave interaction with a vertical porous barrier.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparison of analytical and numerical solutions for wave interaction with a vertical porous barrier.
Authors: Mackay, Ed1 (AUTHOR) e.mackay@exeter.ac.uk, Johanning, Lars1,2 (AUTHOR)
Source: Ocean Engineering. Mar2020, Vol. 199, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subjects: Analytical solutions, Boundary element methods, Free convection, Drag coefficient, Drag (Aerodynamics), Reflectance, Free surfaces
Abstract: Analytical solutions for wave interaction with a vertical porous barrier are presented. The analytical solutions are derived using two different methods for taking the depth-average of the pressure drop across the porous barrier. Both solutions assume that the evanescent modes in the wave field can be neglected. The results from the analytical models are compared to results from an iterative boundary element method (BEM) model. The BEM model shows that neglecting evanescent modes is a reasonable assumption for long waves, but that for short waves the velocity through the porous wall from the evanescent modes can be up to 25% of the velocity from the progressive modes at the free surface. However, the effect of neglecting the evanescent modes has only a small effect on the depth-averaged velocity through porous wall and the analytical models derived using depth-averaged assumptions are shown to give good agreement with the BEM model for the reflection coefficient, horizontal force and overturning moment on the porous barrier. The analytical models are used to investigate the effects of the drag and inertia coefficients of the porous barrier on the behaviour of the solution. It is shown that for fixed values of the drag coefficient, wave frequency and amplitude, the solutions for the reflection coefficient lie on approximately semicircular arcs on the complex plane, with the position on the arc determined by the inertial coefficient. This places bounds on the size of the phase change in the reflected and transmitted wave that are possible. The analytical models are also used to derive the asymptotic behaviour of the solution in long and short waves. The implications of the results for more general cases of wave interaction with porous structures are discussed. • New analytical solutions presented for wave interaction with vertical porous barrier. • Analytical solutions agree well with iterative boundary element method solution. • Asymptotic solutions for long and short waves presented. • Bounds derived for maximum phase change in reflected and transmitted waves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Ocean Engineering is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 141904214
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Comparison of analytical and numerical solutions for wave interaction with a vertical porous barrier.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mackay%2C+Ed%22">Mackay, Ed</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> e.mackay@exeter.ac.uk</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Johanning%2C+Lars%22">Johanning, Lars</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Ocean+Engineering%22">Ocean Engineering</searchLink>. Mar2020, Vol. 199, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Analytical+solutions%22">Analytical solutions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Boundary+element+methods%22">Boundary element methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Free+convection%22">Free convection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Drag+coefficient%22">Drag coefficient</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Drag+%28Aerodynamics%29%22">Drag (Aerodynamics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reflectance%22">Reflectance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Free+surfaces%22">Free surfaces</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Analytical solutions for wave interaction with a vertical porous barrier are presented. The analytical solutions are derived using two different methods for taking the depth-average of the pressure drop across the porous barrier. Both solutions assume that the evanescent modes in the wave field can be neglected. The results from the analytical models are compared to results from an iterative boundary element method (BEM) model. The BEM model shows that neglecting evanescent modes is a reasonable assumption for long waves, but that for short waves the velocity through the porous wall from the evanescent modes can be up to 25% of the velocity from the progressive modes at the free surface. However, the effect of neglecting the evanescent modes has only a small effect on the depth-averaged velocity through porous wall and the analytical models derived using depth-averaged assumptions are shown to give good agreement with the BEM model for the reflection coefficient, horizontal force and overturning moment on the porous barrier. The analytical models are used to investigate the effects of the drag and inertia coefficients of the porous barrier on the behaviour of the solution. It is shown that for fixed values of the drag coefficient, wave frequency and amplitude, the solutions for the reflection coefficient lie on approximately semicircular arcs on the complex plane, with the position on the arc determined by the inertial coefficient. This places bounds on the size of the phase change in the reflected and transmitted wave that are possible. The analytical models are also used to derive the asymptotic behaviour of the solution in long and short waves. The implications of the results for more general cases of wave interaction with porous structures are discussed. • New analytical solutions presented for wave interaction with vertical porous barrier. • Analytical solutions agree well with iterative boundary element method solution. • Asymptotic solutions for long and short waves presented. • Bounds derived for maximum phase change in reflected and transmitted waves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Ocean Engineering is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=141904214
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107032
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 1
        StartPage: N.PAG
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Analytical solutions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Boundary element methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Free convection
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Drag coefficient
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Drag (Aerodynamics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reflectance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Free surfaces
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Comparison of analytical and numerical solutions for wave interaction with a vertical porous barrier.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mackay, Ed
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Johanning, Lars
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Text: Mar2020
              Type: published
              Y: 2020
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00298018
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 199
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Ocean Engineering
              Type: main
ResultId 1