Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields.
Saved in:
| Title: | Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Thelwall, Mike1 m.thelwall@wlv.ac.uk, Maflahi, Nabeil1 |
| Source: | Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology. Aug2020, Vol. 71 Issue 8, p968-978. 11p. 12 Graphs. |
| Subjects: | Authors, Authorship, Confidence intervals, International relations, Interprofessional relations, Medical research, Serial publications, Statistics, Teams in the workplace, Bibliographic databases, Data analysis, Periodical articles, Citation analysis, Impact factor (Citation analysis), Descriptive statistics |
| Geographic Terms: | Australia, China, Germany, United Kingdom, India, Japan, United States |
| Abstract: | Research collaboration is promoted by governments and research funders, but if the relative prevalence and merits of collaboration vary internationally then different national and disciplinary strategies may be needed to promote it. This study compares the team size and field normalized citation impact of research across all 27 Scopus broad fields in the 10 countries with the most journal articles indexed in Scopus 2008–2012. The results show that team size varies substantially by discipline and country, with Japan (4.2) having two‐thirds more authors per article than the United Kingdom (2.5). Solo authorship is rare in China (4%) but common in the United Kingdom (27%). While increasing team size associates with higher citation impact in almost all countries and fields, this association is much weaker in China than elsewhere. There are also field differences in the association between citation impact and collaboration. For example, larger team sizes in the Business, Management & Accounting category do not seem to associate with greater research impact, and for China and India, solo authorship associates with higher citation impact in this field. Overall, there are substantial international and field differences in the extent to which researchers collaborate and the extent to which collaboration associates with higher citation impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 144424396 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thelwall%2C+Mike%22">Thelwall, Mike</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> m.thelwall@wlv.ac.uk</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Maflahi%2C+Nabeil%22">Maflahi, Nabeil</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+the+Association+for+Information+Science+%26+Technology%22">Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology</searchLink>. Aug2020, Vol. 71 Issue 8, p968-978. 11p. 12 Graphs. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Authors%22">Authors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Authorship%22">Authorship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22International+relations%22">International relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interprofessional+relations%22">Interprofessional relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+research%22">Medical research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Serial+publications%22">Serial publications</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistics%22">Statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teams+in+the+workplace%22">Teams in the workplace</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bibliographic+databases%22">Bibliographic databases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+analysis%22">Data analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Periodical+articles%22">Periodical articles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Citation+analysis%22">Citation analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Impact+factor+%28Citation+analysis%29%22">Impact factor (Citation analysis)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22China%22">China</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Germany%22">Germany</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22India%22">India</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Japan%22">Japan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Research collaboration is promoted by governments and research funders, but if the relative prevalence and merits of collaboration vary internationally then different national and disciplinary strategies may be needed to promote it. This study compares the team size and field normalized citation impact of research across all 27 Scopus broad fields in the 10 countries with the most journal articles indexed in Scopus 2008–2012. The results show that team size varies substantially by discipline and country, with Japan (4.2) having two‐thirds more authors per article than the United Kingdom (2.5). Solo authorship is rare in China (4%) but common in the United Kingdom (27%). While increasing team size associates with higher citation impact in almost all countries and fields, this association is much weaker in China than elsewhere. There are also field differences in the association between citation impact and collaboration. For example, larger team sizes in the Business, Management & Accounting category do not seem to associate with greater research impact, and for China and India, solo authorship associates with higher citation impact in this field. Overall, there are substantial international and field differences in the extent to which researchers collaborate and the extent to which collaboration associates with higher citation impact. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=144424396 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/asi.24315 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 968 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Authors Type: general – SubjectFull: Authorship Type: general – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals Type: general – SubjectFull: International relations Type: general – SubjectFull: Interprofessional relations Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical research Type: general – SubjectFull: Serial publications Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Teams in the workplace Type: general – SubjectFull: Bibliographic databases Type: general – SubjectFull: Data analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Periodical articles Type: general – SubjectFull: Citation analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Impact factor (Citation analysis) Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Australia Type: general – SubjectFull: China Type: general – SubjectFull: Germany Type: general – SubjectFull: United Kingdom Type: general – SubjectFull: India Type: general – SubjectFull: Japan Type: general – SubjectFull: United States Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Thelwall, Mike – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Maflahi, Nabeil IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 08 Text: Aug2020 Type: published Y: 2020 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 23301635 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 71 – Type: issue Value: 8 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |