Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound Computer-Aided Diagnosis Software Compared with That of Radiologists with Different Levels of Expertise for Thyroid Malignancy: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound Computer-Aided Diagnosis Software Compared with That of Radiologists with Different Levels of Expertise for Thyroid Malignancy: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Authors: Ye, Feng-Ying1 (AUTHOR), Lyu, Guo-Rong1,2 (AUTHOR) lgr_feus@sina.com, Li, Shang-Qing2 (AUTHOR), You, Jian-Hong3 (AUTHOR), Wang, Kang-Jian4 (AUTHOR), Cai, Ming-Li5 (AUTHOR), Su, Qi-Chen1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Jan2021, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p114-124. 11p.
Subjects: Diagnostic ultrasonic imaging, Thyroid gland, Nodular disease, Radiologists, Thyroid nodules, Longitudinal method, Computer software, Research, Ultrasonic imaging, Thyroid gland tumors, Research methodology, Medical cooperation, Evaluation research, Comparative studies, Clinical competence, Computer-aided diagnosis, Medical specialties & specialists
Abstract: The aim of the work described here was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound thyroid computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software. This multicenter prospective study included 494 patients (565 thyroid nodules) who underwent surgery or biopsy after ultrasonography at four hospitals from January 2019 to September 2019. The diagnostic performance metrics of different readers were calculated and compared with the pathologic results. The sensitivity of CAD was outstanding and was equivalent to that of a senior radiologist (90.51% vs. 88.47%, p > 0.05). The area under the curve of CAD was equivalent to that of a junior radiologist (0.748 vs. 0.739, p > 0.05). However, the specificity was only 49.63%, which was lower than those of the three radiologists (75.56%, 85.93% and 90.37% for the junior, intermediate and senior radiologists, respectively). The diagnostic performance of the junior radiologist was significantly improved with the aid of CAD (junior + CAD). The sensitivity and area under the curve of junior + CAD were improved from 72.20% to 89.93% and from 0.739 to 0.816, respectively (both p values <0.05), and the positive predictive value, negative predictive value and κ coefficient improved from 76.3% to 78.6%, 82.0% to 86.8% and 0.394 to 0.511, respectively. Though specificity slightly decreased from 75.56% to 73.33%, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In general, the clinical application value of CAD is promising, and its instrumental value for junior radiologists is significant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 147116632
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound Computer-Aided Diagnosis Software Compared with That of Radiologists with Different Levels of Expertise for Thyroid Malignancy: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Ye%2C+Feng-Ying%22&quot;&gt;Ye, Feng-Ying&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Lyu%2C+Guo-Rong%22&quot;&gt;Lyu, Guo-Rong&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1,2&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;i&gt; lgr_feus@sina.com&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Li%2C+Shang-Qing%22&quot;&gt;Li, Shang-Qing&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;2&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22You%2C+Jian-Hong%22&quot;&gt;You, Jian-Hong&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;3&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Wang%2C+Kang-Jian%22&quot;&gt;Wang, Kang-Jian&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;4&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Cai%2C+Ming-Li%22&quot;&gt;Cai, Ming-Li&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;5&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Su%2C+Qi-Chen%22&quot;&gt;Su, Qi-Chen&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Ultrasound+in+Medicine+%26+Biology%22&quot;&gt;Ultrasound in Medicine &amp; Biology&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Jan2021, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p114-124. 11p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Diagnostic+ultrasonic+imaging%22&quot;&gt;Diagnostic ultrasonic imaging&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Thyroid+gland%22&quot;&gt;Thyroid gland&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Nodular+disease%22&quot;&gt;Nodular disease&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Radiologists%22&quot;&gt;Radiologists&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Thyroid+nodules%22&quot;&gt;Thyroid nodules&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Longitudinal+method%22&quot;&gt;Longitudinal method&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Computer+software%22&quot;&gt;Computer software&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research%22&quot;&gt;Research&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Ultrasonic+imaging%22&quot;&gt;Ultrasonic imaging&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Thyroid+gland+tumors%22&quot;&gt;Thyroid gland tumors&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research+methodology%22&quot;&gt;Research methodology&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Medical+cooperation%22&quot;&gt;Medical cooperation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Evaluation+research%22&quot;&gt;Evaluation research&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Comparative+studies%22&quot;&gt;Comparative studies&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Clinical+competence%22&quot;&gt;Clinical competence&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Computer-aided+diagnosis%22&quot;&gt;Computer-aided diagnosis&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Medical+specialties+%26+specialists%22&quot;&gt;Medical specialties &amp; specialists&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The aim of the work described here was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound thyroid computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software. This multicenter prospective study included 494 patients (565 thyroid nodules) who underwent surgery or biopsy after ultrasonography at four hospitals from January 2019 to September 2019. The diagnostic performance metrics of different readers were calculated and compared with the pathologic results. The sensitivity of CAD was outstanding and was equivalent to that of a senior radiologist (90.51% vs. 88.47%, p &gt; 0.05). The area under the curve of CAD was equivalent to that of a junior radiologist (0.748 vs. 0.739, p &gt; 0.05). However, the specificity was only 49.63%, which was lower than those of the three radiologists (75.56%, 85.93% and 90.37% for the junior, intermediate and senior radiologists, respectively). The diagnostic performance of the junior radiologist was significantly improved with the aid of CAD (junior + CAD). The sensitivity and area under the curve of junior + CAD were improved from 72.20% to 89.93% and from 0.739 to 0.816, respectively (both p values &lt;0.05), and the positive predictive value, negative predictive value and κ coefficient improved from 76.3% to 78.6%, 82.0% to 86.8% and 0.394 to 0.511, respectively. Though specificity slightly decreased from 75.56% to 73.33%, the difference was not statistically significant (p &gt; 0.05). In general, the clinical application value of CAD is promising, and its instrumental value for junior radiologists is significant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Ultrasound in Medicine &amp; Biology is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=147116632
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.09.019
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 114
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Diagnostic ultrasonic imaging
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thyroid gland
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Nodular disease
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Radiologists
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thyroid nodules
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Longitudinal method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ultrasonic imaging
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thyroid gland tumors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical cooperation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Clinical competence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer-aided diagnosis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical specialties & specialists
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound Computer-Aided Diagnosis Software Compared with That of Radiologists with Different Levels of Expertise for Thyroid Malignancy: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ye, Feng-Ying
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lyu, Guo-Rong
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Li, Shang-Qing
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: You, Jian-Hong
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wang, Kang-Jian
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cai, Ming-Li
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Su, Qi-Chen
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 03015629
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 47
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
              Type: main
ResultId 1