Optimized experimental design for seismic full waveform inversion: A computationally efficient method including a flexible implementation of acquisition costs.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Optimized experimental design for seismic full waveform inversion: A computationally efficient method including a flexible implementation of acquisition costs.
Authors: Krampe, Valérie1 (AUTHOR) valerie.krampe@erdw.ethz.ch, Edme, Pascal1 (AUTHOR), Maurer, Hansruedi1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Geophysical Prospecting. Jan2021, Vol. 69 Issue 1, p152-166. 15p.
Subjects: Earthquake resistant design, Experimental design, Hessian matrices, Variable costs, Imaging systems in seismology, Seismic surveys
Abstract: Optimized experimental design aims at reducing the cost of a seismic survey by identifying the optimal locations and amounts of sources and receivers. While the acquisition design in the context of seismic imaging applies criteria like fold, offset and spatial sampling, different attributes such as the sensitivity kernels are more relevant for seismic full waveform inversion. An ideal measure to quantify the goodness of an acquisition design relies on the eigenvalue spectrum of the approximate Hessian matrix, but this technique is computationally too expensive for practical use. A more affordable goodness measure has been proposed in the past, but we demonstrate that this measure is inappropriate for target‐oriented optimized experimental design. To address those issues, we derived a sequential receiver‐based procedure using a goodness measure based on the determinant of the approximate Hessian matrix. We show with numerical tests that it efficiently provides an optimized design for target‐oriented as well as for extensive full waveform inversion. This design allows a better reconstruction of the subsurface than an evenly spaced acquisition geometry. Furthermore, the optimization algorithm itself can easily be parallelized, therefore making it attractive for applications to large‐scale three‐dimensional surveys. In addition, our algorithm is able to incorporate variable costs, representing any kind of acquisition‐related costs, for every individual source location. The combined optimization with respect to the information content of sources and to the true cost will allow a more comprehensive and realistic survey planning and has a high potential for further applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Geophysical Prospecting is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 147580641
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Optimized experimental design for seismic full waveform inversion: A computationally efficient method including a flexible implementation of acquisition costs.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Krampe%2C+Valérie%22">Krampe, Valérie</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> valerie.krampe@erdw.ethz.ch</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Edme%2C+Pascal%22">Edme, Pascal</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Maurer%2C+Hansruedi%22">Maurer, Hansruedi</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Geophysical+Prospecting%22">Geophysical Prospecting</searchLink>. Jan2021, Vol. 69 Issue 1, p152-166. 15p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Earthquake+resistant+design%22">Earthquake resistant design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experimental+design%22">Experimental design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hessian+matrices%22">Hessian matrices</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Variable+costs%22">Variable costs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Imaging+systems+in+seismology%22">Imaging systems in seismology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Seismic+surveys%22">Seismic surveys</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Optimized experimental design aims at reducing the cost of a seismic survey by identifying the optimal locations and amounts of sources and receivers. While the acquisition design in the context of seismic imaging applies criteria like fold, offset and spatial sampling, different attributes such as the sensitivity kernels are more relevant for seismic full waveform inversion. An ideal measure to quantify the goodness of an acquisition design relies on the eigenvalue spectrum of the approximate Hessian matrix, but this technique is computationally too expensive for practical use. A more affordable goodness measure has been proposed in the past, but we demonstrate that this measure is inappropriate for target‐oriented optimized experimental design. To address those issues, we derived a sequential receiver‐based procedure using a goodness measure based on the determinant of the approximate Hessian matrix. We show with numerical tests that it efficiently provides an optimized design for target‐oriented as well as for extensive full waveform inversion. This design allows a better reconstruction of the subsurface than an evenly spaced acquisition geometry. Furthermore, the optimization algorithm itself can easily be parallelized, therefore making it attractive for applications to large‐scale three‐dimensional surveys. In addition, our algorithm is able to incorporate variable costs, representing any kind of acquisition‐related costs, for every individual source location. The combined optimization with respect to the information content of sources and to the true cost will allow a more comprehensive and realistic survey planning and has a high potential for further applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Geophysical Prospecting is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=147580641
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/1365-2478.13040
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 152
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Earthquake resistant design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Experimental design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hessian matrices
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Variable costs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Imaging systems in seismology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Seismic surveys
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Optimized experimental design for seismic full waveform inversion: A computationally efficient method including a flexible implementation of acquisition costs.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Krampe, Valérie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Edme, Pascal
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Maurer, Hansruedi
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00168025
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 69
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Geophysical Prospecting
              Type: main
ResultId 1