Involvement of radiologists in oncologic multidisciplinary team meetings: an international survey by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Involvement of radiologists in oncologic multidisciplinary team meetings: an international survey by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging.
Authors: Neri, Emanuele1 (AUTHOR) emanuele.neri@med.unipi.it, Gabelloni, Michela1 (AUTHOR), Bäuerle, Tobias2 (AUTHOR), Beets-Tan, Regina3 (AUTHOR), Caruso, Damiano4 (AUTHOR), D'Anastasi, Melvin5 (AUTHOR), Dinkel, Julien6 (AUTHOR), Fournier, Laure S7 (AUTHOR), Gourtsoyianni, Sofia8 (AUTHOR), Hoffmann, Ralf-Thorsten9 (AUTHOR), Mayerhöfer, Marius Erik10 (AUTHOR), Regge, Daniele11 (AUTHOR), Schlemmer, Heinz Peter12 (AUTHOR), Laghi, Andrea4 (AUTHOR)
Source: European Radiology. 2021, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p983-991. 9p. 2 Color Photographs, 4 Charts, 1 Graph, 1 Map.
Subjects: Radiologists, Continuing medical education, Working hours, Perceived benefit, Time management
Abstract: Objectives: Multidisciplinary tumour boards (MTBs) play an increasingly important role in managing cancer patients from diagnosis to treatment. However, many problems arise around the organisation of MTBs, both in terms of organisation-administration and time management. In this context, the European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI) conducted a survey among its members, aimed at assessing the quality and amount of involvement of radiologists in MTBs, their role in it and related issues.Methods: All members were invited to fill in a questionnaire consisting of 15 questions with both open and multiple-choice answers. Simple descriptive analyses and graphs were performed.Results: A total of 292 ESOI members in full standing for the year 2018 joined the survey. Most respondents (89%) declared to attend MT-Bs, but only 114 respondents (43.9%) review over 70% of exams prior to MTB meetings, mainly due to lack of time due to a busy schedule for imaging and reporting (46.6%). Perceived benefits (i.e. surgical and histological feedback (86.9%), improved knowledge of cancer treatment (82.7%) and better interaction between radiologists and referring clinicians for discussing rare cases (56.9%)) and issues (i.e. attending MTB meetings during regular working hours (71.9%) and lack of accreditation with continuing medical education (CME) (85%)) are reported.Conclusions: Despite the value and benefits of radiologists' participation in MTBs, issues like improper preparation due to a busy schedule and no counterpart in CME accreditation require efforts to improve the role of radiologists for a better patient care.Key Points: • Most radiologists attend multidisciplinary tumour boards, but less than half of them review images in advance, mostly due to time constraints. • Feedback about radiological diagnoses, improved knowledge of cancer treatment and interaction with referring clinicians are perceived as major benefits. • Concerns were expressed about scheduling multidisciplinary tumour boards during regular working hours and lack of accreditation with continuing medical education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 148163982
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Involvement of radiologists in oncologic multidisciplinary team meetings: an international survey by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Neri%2C+Emanuele%22">Neri, Emanuele</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> emanuele.neri@med.unipi.it</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gabelloni%2C+Michela%22">Gabelloni, Michela</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bäuerle%2C+Tobias%22">Bäuerle, Tobias</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Beets-Tan%2C+Regina%22">Beets-Tan, Regina</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Caruso%2C+Damiano%22">Caruso, Damiano</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22D'Anastasi%2C+Melvin%22">D'Anastasi, Melvin</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dinkel%2C+Julien%22">Dinkel, Julien</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fournier%2C+Laure+S%22">Fournier, Laure S</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gourtsoyianni%2C+Sofia%22">Gourtsoyianni, Sofia</searchLink><relatesTo>8</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hoffmann%2C+Ralf-Thorsten%22">Hoffmann, Ralf-Thorsten</searchLink><relatesTo>9</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mayerhöfer%2C+Marius+Erik%22">Mayerhöfer, Marius Erik</searchLink><relatesTo>10</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Regge%2C+Daniele%22">Regge, Daniele</searchLink><relatesTo>11</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Schlemmer%2C+Heinz+Peter%22">Schlemmer, Heinz Peter</searchLink><relatesTo>12</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Laghi%2C+Andrea%22">Laghi, Andrea</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22European+Radiology%22">European Radiology</searchLink>. 2021, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p983-991. 9p. 2 Color Photographs, 4 Charts, 1 Graph, 1 Map.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Radiologists%22">Radiologists</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Continuing+medical+education%22">Continuing medical education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Working+hours%22">Working hours</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Perceived+benefit%22">Perceived benefit</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Time+management%22">Time management</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: <bold>Objectives: </bold>Multidisciplinary tumour boards (MTBs) play an increasingly important role in managing cancer patients from diagnosis to treatment. However, many problems arise around the organisation of MTBs, both in terms of organisation-administration and time management. In this context, the European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI) conducted a survey among its members, aimed at assessing the quality and amount of involvement of radiologists in MTBs, their role in it and related issues.<bold>Methods: </bold>All members were invited to fill in a questionnaire consisting of 15 questions with both open and multiple-choice answers. Simple descriptive analyses and graphs were performed.<bold>Results: </bold>A total of 292 ESOI members in full standing for the year 2018 joined the survey. Most respondents (89%) declared to attend MT-Bs, but only 114 respondents (43.9%) review over 70% of exams prior to MTB meetings, mainly due to lack of time due to a busy schedule for imaging and reporting (46.6%). Perceived benefits (i.e. surgical and histological feedback (86.9%), improved knowledge of cancer treatment (82.7%) and better interaction between radiologists and referring clinicians for discussing rare cases (56.9%)) and issues (i.e. attending MTB meetings during regular working hours (71.9%) and lack of accreditation with continuing medical education (CME) (85%)) are reported.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Despite the value and benefits of radiologists' participation in MTBs, issues like improper preparation due to a busy schedule and no counterpart in CME accreditation require efforts to improve the role of radiologists for a better patient care.<bold>Key Points: </bold>• Most radiologists attend multidisciplinary tumour boards, but less than half of them review images in advance, mostly due to time constraints. • Feedback about radiological diagnoses, improved knowledge of cancer treatment and interaction with referring clinicians are perceived as major benefits. • Concerns were expressed about scheduling multidisciplinary tumour boards during regular working hours and lack of accreditation with continuing medical education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=148163982
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00330-020-07178-w
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 983
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Radiologists
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Continuing medical education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Working hours
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Perceived benefit
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Time management
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Involvement of radiologists in oncologic multidisciplinary team meetings: an international survey by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Neri, Emanuele
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gabelloni, Michela
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bäuerle, Tobias
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Beets-Tan, Regina
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Caruso, Damiano
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: D'Anastasi, Melvin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dinkel, Julien
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fournier, Laure S
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gourtsoyianni, Sofia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hoffmann, Ralf-Thorsten
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mayerhöfer, Marius Erik
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Regge, Daniele
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Schlemmer, Heinz Peter
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Laghi, Andrea
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Text: 2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09387994
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 31
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: European Radiology
              Type: main
ResultId 1