Perceived variability reflects the reliability of individual items.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Perceived variability reflects the reliability of individual items.
Authors: Jeong, Jinhyeok1, Chong, Sang Chul1,2 scchong@yonsei.ac.kr
Source: Vision Research. Jun2021, Vol. 183, p91-105. 15p.
Subjects: Visual perception, Dimensional preference, Visual acuity, Eye tracking, Eye movements, Research, Mental orientation, Research evaluation, Research methodology, Evaluation research, Comparative studies
Abstract: When confronted with many visual items, people can compute their variability accurately and rapidly, which facilitates efficient information processing and optimal decision making. However, how the visual system computes variability is still unclear. To investigate this, we implemented situations whereby estimates of variability based on several possible variability measures (e.g., range, standard deviation, and weighted standard deviation) could be differentiated, and then examined which best accounted for human variability perception. In three psychophysical experiments, participants watched two arrays of items with various orientations and judged which had more variable orientations. Results showed that perceived variability was most consistent with the weighted standard deviation based on the reliability of individual items. Specifically, participants gave less consideration to deviant orientations that were likely to be outliers, and greater consideration to salient orientations that were likely to be encoded precisely. This reliability-based weighted standard deviation suggests an efficient and flexible way of representing visual variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Vision Research is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 149837287
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Perceived variability reflects the reliability of individual items.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jeong%2C+Jinhyeok%22">Jeong, Jinhyeok</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chong%2C+Sang+Chul%22">Chong, Sang Chul</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo><i> scchong@yonsei.ac.kr</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Vision+Research%22">Vision Research</searchLink>. Jun2021, Vol. 183, p91-105. 15p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Visual+perception%22">Visual perception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dimensional+preference%22">Dimensional preference</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Visual+acuity%22">Visual acuity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Eye+tracking%22">Eye tracking</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Eye+movements%22">Eye movements</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research%22">Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mental+orientation%22">Mental orientation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+evaluation%22">Research evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+research%22">Evaluation research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+studies%22">Comparative studies</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: When confronted with many visual items, people can compute their variability accurately and rapidly, which facilitates efficient information processing and optimal decision making. However, how the visual system computes variability is still unclear. To investigate this, we implemented situations whereby estimates of variability based on several possible variability measures (e.g., range, standard deviation, and weighted standard deviation) could be differentiated, and then examined which best accounted for human variability perception. In three psychophysical experiments, participants watched two arrays of items with various orientations and judged which had more variable orientations. Results showed that perceived variability was most consistent with the weighted standard deviation based on the reliability of individual items. Specifically, participants gave less consideration to deviant orientations that were likely to be outliers, and greater consideration to salient orientations that were likely to be encoded precisely. This reliability-based weighted standard deviation suggests an efficient and flexible way of representing visual variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Vision Research is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=149837287
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.02.008
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 91
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Visual perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Dimensional preference
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Visual acuity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Eye tracking
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Eye movements
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mental orientation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative studies
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Perceived variability reflects the reliability of individual items.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jeong, Jinhyeok
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chong, Sang Chul
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00426989
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 183
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Vision Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1