Comparison of two culture methods during in vitro spermatogenesis of vitrified-warmed testis tissue: Organ culture vs. hanging drop culture.
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparison of two culture methods during in vitro spermatogenesis of vitrified-warmed testis tissue: Organ culture vs. hanging drop culture. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Patra, Tanushree1 (AUTHOR), Pathak, Devendra2 (AUTHOR), Gupta, Mukesh Kumar1 (AUTHOR) guptam@nitrkl.ac.in |
| Source: | Cryobiology. Jun2021, Vol. 100, p142-150. 9p. |
| Subjects: | Organ culture, Tissue culture, Spermatogenesis, Testis, Cross-cultural studies, Histology |
| Abstract: | Solid surface vitrification (SSV) is a cost effective and simple method for testis tissue preservation. Vitrified-warmed testis tissue was successfully cultured using various organ culture methods. In this study, we compared two culture methods viz. hanging drop (HD) and organ culture (OC) methods for in vitro spermatogenesis of goat testis tissue vitrified-warmed by SSV. It was observed that OC method was superior (p < 0.05) to HD method in terms of post-warming metabolic activity of testicular tissue, as measured by MTT assay on Day 7 and Day 14 of culture, respectively. The size of the tissue also played an important role in post-warming metabolic activity and viability (4 mm3: 72.7 ± 1.2% vs. 9 mm3: 62.7 ± 1.3% vs. 16 mm3: 40.5 ± 1.7%) of vitrified tissues with smaller tissue resulting in better result. The vitrification-induced ROS activity significantly decreased during their in vitro culture. Histology and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed the rupture of basal membrane, surface morphology and, cell loss due to vitrification. However, histology and immunohistochemistry showed the progression of in vitro spermatogenesis and formation of elongated spermatozoa in both fresh and vitrified-warmed testis tissue cultured by OC method. Taken together, our results suggest that OC method is superior to HD method for culturing goat testis tissue vitrified-warmed by SSV. • Viability of vitrified-warmed goat testicular tissue varied with the tissue size: smaller the tissue size, better the post-warming viability. • In vitro culture by organ culture method was superior to hanging drop method for culturing vitrified-warmed testis tissue. • Histology and immunohistochemistry confirmed the spermatogenic progression and sperm production in vitrified-warmed testis tissue by organ culture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Cryobiology is the property of Academic Press Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 150387748 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Comparison of two culture methods during in vitro spermatogenesis of vitrified-warmed testis tissue: Organ culture vs. hanging drop culture. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Patra%2C+Tanushree%22">Patra, Tanushree</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pathak%2C+Devendra%22">Pathak, Devendra</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gupta%2C+Mukesh+Kumar%22">Gupta, Mukesh Kumar</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> guptam@nitrkl.ac.in</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Cryobiology%22">Cryobiology</searchLink>. Jun2021, Vol. 100, p142-150. 9p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organ+culture%22">Organ culture</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tissue+culture%22">Tissue culture</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Spermatogenesis%22">Spermatogenesis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Testis%22">Testis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cross-cultural+studies%22">Cross-cultural studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Histology%22">Histology</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Solid surface vitrification (SSV) is a cost effective and simple method for testis tissue preservation. Vitrified-warmed testis tissue was successfully cultured using various organ culture methods. In this study, we compared two culture methods viz. hanging drop (HD) and organ culture (OC) methods for in vitro spermatogenesis of goat testis tissue vitrified-warmed by SSV. It was observed that OC method was superior (p < 0.05) to HD method in terms of post-warming metabolic activity of testicular tissue, as measured by MTT assay on Day 7 and Day 14 of culture, respectively. The size of the tissue also played an important role in post-warming metabolic activity and viability (4 mm3: 72.7 ± 1.2% vs. 9 mm3: 62.7 ± 1.3% vs. 16 mm3: 40.5 ± 1.7%) of vitrified tissues with smaller tissue resulting in better result. The vitrification-induced ROS activity significantly decreased during their in vitro culture. Histology and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed the rupture of basal membrane, surface morphology and, cell loss due to vitrification. However, histology and immunohistochemistry showed the progression of in vitro spermatogenesis and formation of elongated spermatozoa in both fresh and vitrified-warmed testis tissue cultured by OC method. Taken together, our results suggest that OC method is superior to HD method for culturing goat testis tissue vitrified-warmed by SSV. • Viability of vitrified-warmed goat testicular tissue varied with the tissue size: smaller the tissue size, better the post-warming viability. • In vitro culture by organ culture method was superior to hanging drop method for culturing vitrified-warmed testis tissue. • Histology and immunohistochemistry confirmed the spermatogenic progression and sperm production in vitrified-warmed testis tissue by organ culture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Cryobiology is the property of Academic Press Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=150387748 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2021.02.006 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 9 StartPage: 142 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Organ culture Type: general – SubjectFull: Tissue culture Type: general – SubjectFull: Spermatogenesis Type: general – SubjectFull: Testis Type: general – SubjectFull: Cross-cultural studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Histology Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Comparison of two culture methods during in vitro spermatogenesis of vitrified-warmed testis tissue: Organ culture vs. hanging drop culture. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Patra, Tanushree – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Pathak, Devendra – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gupta, Mukesh Kumar IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Jun2021 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00112240 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 100 Titles: – TitleFull: Cryobiology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |