View in EDS

Monitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: Insights from a European qualitative study.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Monitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: Insights from a European qualitative study.
Authors: Cardona, Aurélie1 (AUTHOR) aurelie.cardona@inrae.fr, Tchamitchian, Marc1 (AUTHOR) marc.tchamitchian@inrae.fr, Penvern, Servane1 (AUTHOR) servane.penvern@inrae.fr, Dufils, Arnaud1 (AUTHOR) arnaud.dufils@inrae.fr, Kramer Jacobsen, Stine2 (AUTHOR) stikra@plen.ku.dk, Korsgaard, Maren3 (AUTHOR) mak@gefion.dk, Porcel, Mario4,5 (AUTHOR) mporcel@agrosavia.co, Świergiel, Weronika4 (AUTHOR) weronika@biobasiq.se, Tasin, Marco4,6 (AUTHOR) marco.tasin@unipd.it, Warlop, François7 (AUTHOR) francois.warlop@grab.fr, Sigsgaard, Lene2 (AUTHOR) les@plen.ku.dk
Source: Ecological Indicators. Oct2021, Vol. 129, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subjects: Orchard management, Pesticide use regulations, Birdhouses, Apple orchards, Biodiversity, Sensory perception, Farm management
Abstract: • Lack of information about impact of farming practices on functional biodiversity. • Diversity of perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity. • Current indicators of functional biodiversity inadequate for a diversity of users. • A guiding framework to adapt indicators to different objectives of farm management. The role of functional biodiversity for favouring natural regulation and reducing pesticide use in fruit production is generally acknowledged. Although a number of farmers attempt to favour biodiversity through different strategies (e.g. diversified hedges, nesting boxes), they often lack means to evaluate how their actions contribute in practice to functional biodiversity. We assumed here that to create useful and appropriate monitoring methods, it is necessary to take into account the variety of knowledge, perceptions and interests about functional biodiversity. To test our hypothesis, we adopted a comprehensive and participative approach based on interviews and workshops with farmers, advisors and field agronomists involved in apple orchard management. Our objective was to understand their different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity and then, to design monitoring methods adapted to those perceptions and pre-existing uses. Our findings revealed both a plurality of perceptions of functional biodiversity along with a diversity of objectives and uses of monitoring methods. Based on these results, we identified four main attitudes towards the management of functional biodiversity: the wait-and-see attitude, the naturalist attitude, the regulation attitude and the multifunctional attitude. These attitudes do not correspond to person's profiles, since one person can adopt different attitudes in regard to different biodiversity components or in regard to the different practices supporting biodiversity. In addition, attitudes can vary over time. The identification of these attitudes allowed us to design, with the workshops' participants, a guiding framework to create monitoring programs (i.e. combinations of monitoring methods) adapted to a variety of uses and targeted services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Ecological Indicators is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 151684820
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Monitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: Insights from a European qualitative study.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cardona%2C+Aurélie%22">Cardona, Aurélie</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> aurelie.cardona@inrae.fr</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tchamitchian%2C+Marc%22">Tchamitchian, Marc</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> marc.tchamitchian@inrae.fr</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Penvern%2C+Servane%22">Penvern, Servane</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> servane.penvern@inrae.fr</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dufils%2C+Arnaud%22">Dufils, Arnaud</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> arnaud.dufils@inrae.fr</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kramer+Jacobsen%2C+Stine%22">Kramer Jacobsen, Stine</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> stikra@plen.ku.dk</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Korsgaard%2C+Maren%22">Korsgaard, Maren</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> mak@gefion.dk</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Porcel%2C+Mario%22">Porcel, Mario</searchLink><relatesTo>4,5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> mporcel@agrosavia.co</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Świergiel%2C+Weronika%22">Świergiel, Weronika</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> weronika@biobasiq.se</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tasin%2C+Marco%22">Tasin, Marco</searchLink><relatesTo>4,6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> marco.tasin@unipd.it</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Warlop%2C+François%22">Warlop, François</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> francois.warlop@grab.fr</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sigsgaard%2C+Lene%22">Sigsgaard, Lene</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> les@plen.ku.dk</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Ecological+Indicators%22">Ecological Indicators</searchLink>. Oct2021, Vol. 129, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Orchard+management%22">Orchard management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pesticide+use+regulations%22">Pesticide use regulations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Birdhouses%22">Birdhouses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Apple+orchards%22">Apple orchards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biodiversity%22">Biodiversity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sensory+perception%22">Sensory perception</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Farm+management%22">Farm management</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: • Lack of information about impact of farming practices on functional biodiversity. • Diversity of perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity. • Current indicators of functional biodiversity inadequate for a diversity of users. • A guiding framework to adapt indicators to different objectives of farm management. The role of functional biodiversity for favouring natural regulation and reducing pesticide use in fruit production is generally acknowledged. Although a number of farmers attempt to favour biodiversity through different strategies (e.g. diversified hedges, nesting boxes), they often lack means to evaluate how their actions contribute in practice to functional biodiversity. We assumed here that to create useful and appropriate monitoring methods, it is necessary to take into account the variety of knowledge, perceptions and interests about functional biodiversity. To test our hypothesis, we adopted a comprehensive and participative approach based on interviews and workshops with farmers, advisors and field agronomists involved in apple orchard management. Our objective was to understand their different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity and then, to design monitoring methods adapted to those perceptions and pre-existing uses. Our findings revealed both a plurality of perceptions of functional biodiversity along with a diversity of objectives and uses of monitoring methods. Based on these results, we identified four main attitudes towards the management of functional biodiversity: the wait-and-see attitude, the naturalist attitude, the regulation attitude and the multifunctional attitude. These attitudes do not correspond to person's profiles, since one person can adopt different attitudes in regard to different biodiversity components or in regard to the different practices supporting biodiversity. In addition, attitudes can vary over time. The identification of these attitudes allowed us to design, with the workshops' participants, a guiding framework to create monitoring programs (i.e. combinations of monitoring methods) adapted to a variety of uses and targeted services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Ecological Indicators is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=151684820
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107883
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 1
        StartPage: N.PAG
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Orchard management
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pesticide use regulations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Birdhouses
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Apple orchards
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Biodiversity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sensory perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Farm management
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Monitoring methods adapted to different perceptions and uses of functional biodiversity: Insights from a European qualitative study.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cardona, Aurélie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tchamitchian, Marc
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Penvern, Servane
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Dufils, Arnaud
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kramer Jacobsen, Stine
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Korsgaard, Maren
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Porcel, Mario
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Świergiel, Weronika
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tasin, Marco
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Warlop, François
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sigsgaard, Lene
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Text: Oct2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1470160X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 129
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Ecological Indicators
              Type: main
ResultId 1