View in EDS

Are algae ready to take off? GHG emission savings of algae-to-kerosene production.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Are algae ready to take off? GHG emission savings of algae-to-kerosene production.
Authors: Prussi, M.1 (AUTHOR) matteo.prussi@ec.europa.eu, Weindorf, W.2 (AUTHOR), Buffi, M.1 (AUTHOR), Sánchez López, J.1 (AUTHOR), Scarlat, N.1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Applied Energy. Dec2021, Vol. 304, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subjects: Renewable energy sources, Aircraft fuels, Alternative fuels, Carbon offsetting, Algal biofuels
Abstract: • Sustainable aviation needs liquid fuels, and feedstock availability is crucial. • Algae to kerosene is today one of the few certified pathway. • An assessment of the GHG saving has been performed, using CORSIA methodology. • GHG saving can be up to 68%, for the best case scenario. • Nutrients and energy used for production are crucial to produce a sustainable aviation fuel. Aviation alternative fuels are perceived as an effective short-term mean to decarbonise our flights. Sustainable aviation fuels from algae have been recently approved for commercial flights, and here we present an assessment of their greenhouse gas (GHG) savings. Three case studies have been investigated with different plant designs and cultivation strategies. The Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation's Life Cycle Assessment methodology is used as a guideline to assess the GHG saving potential of aviation fuels from algae. The approach here presented allows having a sound comparison with other alternative fuel production pathways. We show that the cultivation strategy based on oil maximisation does not necessarily provide significant advantages in terms of GHG savings. The assessed GHG savings fall in a wide range, being dependent on the inputs and cultivation strategy considered. In the best-case scenario, up to 68% of GHG savings can be achieved, therefore offering a substantial advantage over traditional fuels. When compared with the GHG saving of kerosene from other traditional bio-based feedstocks, like rapeseed, the results confirm algae as an interesting alternative, provided that certain conditions for their cultivation, such as high process optimisation, nutrient recycling and use of renewable energy to meet input demand, are met. The study also assessed the area potentially needed for an algae production plant able to supply large volumes of raw material to an existing commercial biorefinery. The findings confirm the potential of this feedstock to mitigate land abandonment on the coasts of the Mediterranean basin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Applied Energy is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 153205093
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Are algae ready to take off? GHG emission savings of algae-to-kerosene production.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Prussi%2C+M%2E%22">Prussi, M.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> matteo.prussi@ec.europa.eu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Weindorf%2C+W%2E%22">Weindorf, W.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Buffi%2C+M%2E%22">Buffi, M.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sánchez+López%2C+J%2E%22">Sánchez López, J.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Scarlat%2C+N%2E%22">Scarlat, N.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Applied+Energy%22">Applied Energy</searchLink>. Dec2021, Vol. 304, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Renewable+energy+sources%22">Renewable energy sources</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Aircraft+fuels%22">Aircraft fuels</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Alternative+fuels%22">Alternative fuels</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Carbon+offsetting%22">Carbon offsetting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Algal+biofuels%22">Algal biofuels</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: • Sustainable aviation needs liquid fuels, and feedstock availability is crucial. • Algae to kerosene is today one of the few certified pathway. • An assessment of the GHG saving has been performed, using CORSIA methodology. • GHG saving can be up to 68%, for the best case scenario. • Nutrients and energy used for production are crucial to produce a sustainable aviation fuel. Aviation alternative fuels are perceived as an effective short-term mean to decarbonise our flights. Sustainable aviation fuels from algae have been recently approved for commercial flights, and here we present an assessment of their greenhouse gas (GHG) savings. Three case studies have been investigated with different plant designs and cultivation strategies. The Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation's Life Cycle Assessment methodology is used as a guideline to assess the GHG saving potential of aviation fuels from algae. The approach here presented allows having a sound comparison with other alternative fuel production pathways. We show that the cultivation strategy based on oil maximisation does not necessarily provide significant advantages in terms of GHG savings. The assessed GHG savings fall in a wide range, being dependent on the inputs and cultivation strategy considered. In the best-case scenario, up to 68% of GHG savings can be achieved, therefore offering a substantial advantage over traditional fuels. When compared with the GHG saving of kerosene from other traditional bio-based feedstocks, like rapeseed, the results confirm algae as an interesting alternative, provided that certain conditions for their cultivation, such as high process optimisation, nutrient recycling and use of renewable energy to meet input demand, are met. The study also assessed the area potentially needed for an algae production plant able to supply large volumes of raw material to an existing commercial biorefinery. The findings confirm the potential of this feedstock to mitigate land abandonment on the coasts of the Mediterranean basin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Applied Energy is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=153205093
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117817
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 1
        StartPage: N.PAG
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Renewable energy sources
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Aircraft fuels
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Alternative fuels
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Carbon offsetting
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Algal biofuels
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Are algae ready to take off? GHG emission savings of algae-to-kerosene production.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Prussi, M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Weindorf, W.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Buffi, M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sánchez López, J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Scarlat, N.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 15
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 03062619
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 304
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Applied Energy
              Type: main
ResultId 1