Exploring the Moderating Role of Readers' Perspective in Evaluations of Online Consumer Reviews.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Exploring the Moderating Role of Readers' Perspective in Evaluations of Online Consumer Reviews.
Authors: Abedin, Ehsan1 eabedin@student.unimelb.edu.au, Mendoza, Antonette1, Karunasekera, Shanika1
Source: Journal of Theoretical & Applied Electronic Commerce Research. Dec2021, Vol. 16 Issue 7, p3406-3424. 19p.
Subjects: Consumers' reviews, Author-reader relationships, Virtual communities, Influence, Information needs, Information processing
Abstract: Drawing upon the heuristic–systematic model (HSM) and considering the readers' perspective, this study predicts that readers' involvement and homophily between the reader and the review author (source) moderate the relationships between the credibility perception of online reviews and its antecedent factors. To test our hypotheses, we performed a user study on the Amazon Mechanical Turk platform. The results show that reader's involvement moderates source credibility, internal consistency, review objectivity, and review sidedness on review credibility. In addition, homophily between the reader and the source also moderates the relationship between review credibility and its source. Our study contributes to information processing literature, especially in the context of online reviews, and suggests a better classification of the attributes related to online reviews using the HSM. Besides, it helps e-commerce platforms to customize online reviews for each reader to satisfy their information need and help them to make a better purchasing decision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Theoretical & Applied Electronic Commerce Research is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 154392881
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Exploring the Moderating Role of Readers' Perspective in Evaluations of Online Consumer Reviews.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Abedin%2C+Ehsan%22">Abedin, Ehsan</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> eabedin@student.unimelb.edu.au</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mendoza%2C+Antonette%22">Mendoza, Antonette</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Karunasekera%2C+Shanika%22">Karunasekera, Shanika</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Theoretical+%26+Applied+Electronic+Commerce+Research%22">Journal of Theoretical & Applied Electronic Commerce Research</searchLink>. Dec2021, Vol. 16 Issue 7, p3406-3424. 19p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Consumers'+reviews%22">Consumers' reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Author-reader+relationships%22">Author-reader relationships</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Virtual+communities%22">Virtual communities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Influence%22">Influence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+needs%22">Information needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+processing%22">Information processing</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Drawing upon the heuristic–systematic model (HSM) and considering the readers' perspective, this study predicts that readers' involvement and homophily between the reader and the review author (source) moderate the relationships between the credibility perception of online reviews and its antecedent factors. To test our hypotheses, we performed a user study on the Amazon Mechanical Turk platform. The results show that reader's involvement moderates source credibility, internal consistency, review objectivity, and review sidedness on review credibility. In addition, homophily between the reader and the source also moderates the relationship between review credibility and its source. Our study contributes to information processing literature, especially in the context of online reviews, and suggests a better classification of the attributes related to online reviews using the HSM. Besides, it helps e-commerce platforms to customize online reviews for each reader to satisfy their information need and help them to make a better purchasing decision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Theoretical & Applied Electronic Commerce Research is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=154392881
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.3390/jtaer16070184
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 3406
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Consumers' reviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Author-reader relationships
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Virtual communities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Influence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Information needs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Information processing
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Exploring the Moderating Role of Readers' Perspective in Evaluations of Online Consumer Reviews.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Abedin, Ehsan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mendoza, Antonette
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Karunasekera, Shanika
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 07181876
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 16
            – Type: issue
              Value: 7
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Theoretical & Applied Electronic Commerce Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1