Comparación de Dos Plataformas de Blockchain: Bitcoin y Hyperledger Fabric.
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparación de Dos Plataformas de Blockchain: Bitcoin y Hyperledger Fabric. |
|---|---|
| Alternate Title: | A Comparison of Two Blockchain Platforms: Bitcoin and Hyperledger Fabric. |
| Authors: | Moreno-Arboleda, Francisco J.1 fjmoreno@unal.edu.co, Rodríguez-Camacho, Johan S.1 josrodriguezca@unal.edu.co, Giraldo-Muñoz, Daniel1 dagiraldomu@unal.edu.co |
| Source: | Ingeniería y Competitividad. ene2022, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p1-17. 17p. |
| Subjects: | Blockchains, Number concept, Bitcoin, Distributed databases, Vocabulary |
| Abstract (English): | In this paper we review several works that compare blockchain platforms. For each one, we present the comparison criteria and its emphasis. Additionally, we compared two of the most popular blockchain platforms: Bitcoin and Hyperledger Fabric. With regard to the analyzed works, none of them emphasize on the similarities and differences regarding the flow of a transaction, a complex process in Hyperledger Fabric due to the number of concepts and components involved. To facilitate the comparison, we show the flow of a transaction in both platforms. The analyzed works also do not compare the functions of the components of each platform, for example, of the nodes and their different types, nor do they detail the structure of the blocks. Finally, an effort was made to establish a common vocabulary between the two platforms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Spanish): | En este artículo se presenta una recopilación de varios trabajos de comparación de plataformas de blockchain. Para cada uno se describen los criterios de comparación usados y su énfasis. Además, se compararon dos de las plataformas de blockchain más populares: Bitcoin y Hyperledger Fabric. Con respecto a los trabajos analizados, ninguno enfatiza en las similitudes y diferencias en cuanto al flujo de una transacción, un proceso complejo en Hyperledger Fabric debido a la cantidad de conceptos y de componentes involucrados. Para facilitar la comparación, se ilustra el flujo de una transacción en las dos plataformas. Los trabajos analizados tampoco comparan las funciones de los componentes de cada plataforma, por ejemplo, de los nodos y sus diferentes tipos, ni detallan la estructura de los bloques. Además, se trató de establecer un vocabulario común entre las dos plataformas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Ingeniería y Competitividad is the property of Universidad del Valle and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 154991114 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Comparación de Dos Plataformas de Blockchain: Bitcoin y Hyperledger Fabric. – Name: TitleAlt Label: Alternate Title Group: TiAlt Data: A Comparison of Two Blockchain Platforms: Bitcoin and Hyperledger Fabric. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Moreno-Arboleda%2C+Francisco+J%2E%22">Moreno-Arboleda, Francisco J.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> fjmoreno@unal.edu.co</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rodríguez-Camacho%2C+Johan+S%2E%22">Rodríguez-Camacho, Johan S.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> josrodriguezca@unal.edu.co</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Giraldo-Muñoz%2C+Daniel%22">Giraldo-Muñoz, Daniel</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> dagiraldomu@unal.edu.co</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Ingeniería+y+Competitividad%22">Ingeniería y Competitividad</searchLink>. ene2022, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p1-17. 17p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Blockchains%22">Blockchains</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Number+concept%22">Number concept</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bitcoin%22">Bitcoin</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Distributed+databases%22">Distributed databases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vocabulary%22">Vocabulary</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (English) Group: Ab Data: In this paper we review several works that compare blockchain platforms. For each one, we present the comparison criteria and its emphasis. Additionally, we compared two of the most popular blockchain platforms: Bitcoin and Hyperledger Fabric. With regard to the analyzed works, none of them emphasize on the similarities and differences regarding the flow of a transaction, a complex process in Hyperledger Fabric due to the number of concepts and components involved. To facilitate the comparison, we show the flow of a transaction in both platforms. The analyzed works also do not compare the functions of the components of each platform, for example, of the nodes and their different types, nor do they detail the structure of the blocks. Finally, an effort was made to establish a common vocabulary between the two platforms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (Spanish) Group: Ab Data: En este artículo se presenta una recopilación de varios trabajos de comparación de plataformas de blockchain. Para cada uno se describen los criterios de comparación usados y su énfasis. Además, se compararon dos de las plataformas de blockchain más populares: Bitcoin y Hyperledger Fabric. Con respecto a los trabajos analizados, ninguno enfatiza en las similitudes y diferencias en cuanto al flujo de una transacción, un proceso complejo en Hyperledger Fabric debido a la cantidad de conceptos y de componentes involucrados. Para facilitar la comparación, se ilustra el flujo de una transacción en las dos plataformas. Los trabajos analizados tampoco comparan las funciones de los componentes de cada plataforma, por ejemplo, de los nodos y sus diferentes tipos, ni detallan la estructura de los bloques. Además, se trató de establecer un vocabulario común entre las dos plataformas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Ingeniería y Competitividad is the property of Universidad del Valle and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=154991114 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.25100/iyc.24i1.11027 Languages: – Code: spa Text: Spanish PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 17 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Blockchains Type: general – SubjectFull: Number concept Type: general – SubjectFull: Bitcoin Type: general – SubjectFull: Distributed databases Type: general – SubjectFull: Vocabulary Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Comparación de Dos Plataformas de Blockchain: Bitcoin y Hyperledger Fabric. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Moreno-Arboleda, Francisco J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rodríguez-Camacho, Johan S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Giraldo-Muñoz, Daniel IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Text: ene2022 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 01233033 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 24 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Ingeniería y Competitividad Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
