Mammography self-evaluation online test for screening readers: an Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) initiative.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Mammography self-evaluation online test for screening readers: an Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) initiative.
Authors: Brancato, Beniamino1 (AUTHOR) b.brancato@ispro.toscana.it, Peruzzi, Francesca2 (AUTHOR), Saieva, Calogero3 (AUTHOR), Schiaffino, Simone4 (AUTHOR), Catarzi, Sandra1 (AUTHOR), Risso, Gabriella Gemma1 (AUTHOR), Cozzi, Andrea5 (AUTHOR), Carriero, Serena6 (AUTHOR), Calabrese, Massimo7 (AUTHOR), Montemezzi, Stefania8 (AUTHOR), Zuiani, Chiara9 (AUTHOR), Sardanelli, Francesco4,5 (AUTHOR)
Source: European Radiology. Mar2022, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p1624-1633. 10p.
Subjects: Mammograms, Radiologists, Medical screening, Breast cancer, Self-evaluation, Medical societies
Abstract: Objectives: To report and analyse the characteristics and performance of the first cohort of Italian radiologists completing the national mammography self-evaluation online test established by the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM). Methods: A specifically-built dataset of 132 mammograms (24 with screen-detected cancers and 108 negative cases) was preliminarily tested on 48 radiologists to define pass thresholds (62% sensitivity and 86% specificity) and subsequently made available online to SIRM members during a 13-month timeframe between 2018 and 2019. Associations between participants' characteristics, pass rates, and diagnostic accuracy were then investigated with descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariable regression analyses. Results: A total of 342 radiologists completed the test, 151/342 (44.2%) with success. All individual variables, except gender, showed a significant correlation with pass rates and diagnostic sensitivity, confirmed by univariate logistic regression, while only involvement in organised screening programs and number of mammograms read per year showed a positive association with specificity at univariate logistic regression. In the multivariable regression analysis, fewer variables remained significant: > 3000 mammograms read per year for success rate; female gender, public practice setting, and higher experience self-judgement for sensitivity; no variables were significantly associated with specificity. Conclusions: This national self-evaluation test effectively differentiated multiple aspects of mammographic reading experience, but specific breast imaging experience was shown not to strictly guarantee good diagnostic accuracy. Due to its easy use and the validity of obtained results, this test could be extended to all Italian breast radiologists, regardless of their experience, also as a Breast Unit accreditation criterion. Key Points: • This self-evaluation test was found to be able to differentiate various degrees of mammographic interpretation experience. • Breast cancer screening readers should undergo a self-assessment test, since experience parameters alone do not guarantee diagnostic ability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 155182449
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Mammography self-evaluation online test for screening readers: an Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) initiative.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brancato%2C+Beniamino%22">Brancato, Beniamino</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> b.brancato@ispro.toscana.it</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Peruzzi%2C+Francesca%22">Peruzzi, Francesca</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Saieva%2C+Calogero%22">Saieva, Calogero</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Schiaffino%2C+Simone%22">Schiaffino, Simone</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Catarzi%2C+Sandra%22">Catarzi, Sandra</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Risso%2C+Gabriella+Gemma%22">Risso, Gabriella Gemma</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cozzi%2C+Andrea%22">Cozzi, Andrea</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Carriero%2C+Serena%22">Carriero, Serena</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Calabrese%2C+Massimo%22">Calabrese, Massimo</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Montemezzi%2C+Stefania%22">Montemezzi, Stefania</searchLink><relatesTo>8</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zuiani%2C+Chiara%22">Zuiani, Chiara</searchLink><relatesTo>9</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sardanelli%2C+Francesco%22">Sardanelli, Francesco</searchLink><relatesTo>4,5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22European+Radiology%22">European Radiology</searchLink>. Mar2022, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p1624-1633. 10p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mammograms%22">Mammograms</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Radiologists%22">Radiologists</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+screening%22">Medical screening</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Breast+cancer%22">Breast cancer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-evaluation%22">Self-evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+societies%22">Medical societies</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objectives: To report and analyse the characteristics and performance of the first cohort of Italian radiologists completing the national mammography self-evaluation online test established by the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM). Methods: A specifically-built dataset of 132 mammograms (24 with screen-detected cancers and 108 negative cases) was preliminarily tested on 48 radiologists to define pass thresholds (62% sensitivity and 86% specificity) and subsequently made available online to SIRM members during a 13-month timeframe between 2018 and 2019. Associations between participants' characteristics, pass rates, and diagnostic accuracy were then investigated with descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariable regression analyses. Results: A total of 342 radiologists completed the test, 151/342 (44.2%) with success. All individual variables, except gender, showed a significant correlation with pass rates and diagnostic sensitivity, confirmed by univariate logistic regression, while only involvement in organised screening programs and number of mammograms read per year showed a positive association with specificity at univariate logistic regression. In the multivariable regression analysis, fewer variables remained significant: > 3000 mammograms read per year for success rate; female gender, public practice setting, and higher experience self-judgement for sensitivity; no variables were significantly associated with specificity. Conclusions: This national self-evaluation test effectively differentiated multiple aspects of mammographic reading experience, but specific breast imaging experience was shown not to strictly guarantee good diagnostic accuracy. Due to its easy use and the validity of obtained results, this test could be extended to all Italian breast radiologists, regardless of their experience, also as a Breast Unit accreditation criterion. Key Points: • This self-evaluation test was found to be able to differentiate various degrees of mammographic interpretation experience. • Breast cancer screening readers should undergo a self-assessment test, since experience parameters alone do not guarantee diagnostic ability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=155182449
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00330-021-08241-w
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 1624
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Mammograms
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Radiologists
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical screening
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Breast cancer
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self-evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical societies
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Mammography self-evaluation online test for screening readers: an Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) initiative.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Brancato, Beniamino
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Peruzzi, Francesca
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Saieva, Calogero
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Schiaffino, Simone
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Catarzi, Sandra
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Risso, Gabriella Gemma
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cozzi, Andrea
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Carriero, Serena
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Calabrese, Massimo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Montemezzi, Stefania
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zuiani, Chiara
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sardanelli, Francesco
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Text: Mar2022
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09387994
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 32
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: European Radiology
              Type: main
ResultId 1