View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

MRI dedicated to the emergency department for diplopia or dizziness: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: MRI dedicated to the emergency department for diplopia or dizziness: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Authors: Kepka, Sabrina1,2,3 sabrinakepka@yahoo.fr, Zarca, Kevin2, Lersy, François4, Moris, Mylène1, Godet, Julien5, Deur, Jeanne4, Stoessel, Marie4, Muller, Joris5, Le Borgne, Pierrick1,6, Baloglu, Seyyid4, Fleury, Marie Céline7, Anheim, Mathieu7,8, Bilbault, Pascal1,6, Bierry, Guillaume4,9, Durand Zaleski, Isabelle2,10, Kremer, Stéphane4,9
Source: European Radiology. Nov2022, Vol. 32 Issue 11, p7344-7353. 10p. 2 Diagrams, 4 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Subjects: Magnetic resonance imaging, Diplopia, Dizziness, Propensity score matching, Cost effectiveness
Abstract: Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the costs and organizational benefits of diagnostic workup without and with MRI dedicated to the ED. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational uncontrolled before-after study in one ED of a university hospital in France from July 1, 2018, and January 3, 2020. We included all consecutive patients presenting with dizziness or diplopia. The main outcomes were the clinical decision time of ED physicians and the total costs for each strategy. Outcomes were compared using propensity score with inverse probability weighting in the 2 arms and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. Results: Among the 199 patients during the "before" period (average age: 60.4 years ± 17.6): 112 men (57%), and 181 during the "after" period (average age, 54.8 years ± 18.5): 107 men (59%), the average costs were €2701 (95% CI 1918; 3704) and €2389 (95% CI: €1627; 3280) per patient, respectively. The average time to clinical decision was 9.8 h (95% CI: 8.9 10.7) in the group "before" and 7.7 h (95% CI: 7.1; 8.4) in the group "after" (ICER: €151 saved for a reduction of 1 h in clinical decision time). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis estimated a 71% chance that the MRI dedicated to ED was dominant (less costly and more effective). Conclusion: Easy access to MRI in the ED for posterior circulation stroke-like symptoms must be considered a relevant approach to help physicians for an appropriate and rapid diagnostic with reduction of costs. Trial registration: NCT03660852 Key Points: • A dedicated MRI in the ED for diplopia or dizziness may be considered an efficient strategy improving diagnostic performance, reducing physicians' decision time, and decreasing hospital costs. • This strategy supports clinical decision-making with early treatment and management of patients with posterior circulation-like symptoms in the ED. • There is 71% chance that the MRI dedicated to ED was dominant (less costly and more effective) compared with a strategy without dedicated MRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 160256593
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: MRI dedicated to the emergency department for diplopia or dizziness: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kepka%2C+Sabrina%22">Kepka, Sabrina</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2,3</relatesTo><i> sabrinakepka@yahoo.fr</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zarca%2C+Kevin%22">Zarca, Kevin</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lersy%2C+François%22">Lersy, François</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Moris%2C+Mylène%22">Moris, Mylène</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Godet%2C+Julien%22">Godet, Julien</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Deur%2C+Jeanne%22">Deur, Jeanne</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stoessel%2C+Marie%22">Stoessel, Marie</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Muller%2C+Joris%22">Muller, Joris</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Le+Borgne%2C+Pierrick%22">Le Borgne, Pierrick</searchLink><relatesTo>1,6</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Baloglu%2C+Seyyid%22">Baloglu, Seyyid</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fleury%2C+Marie+Céline%22">Fleury, Marie Céline</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Anheim%2C+Mathieu%22">Anheim, Mathieu</searchLink><relatesTo>7,8</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bilbault%2C+Pascal%22">Bilbault, Pascal</searchLink><relatesTo>1,6</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bierry%2C+Guillaume%22">Bierry, Guillaume</searchLink><relatesTo>4,9</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Durand+Zaleski%2C+Isabelle%22">Durand Zaleski, Isabelle</searchLink><relatesTo>2,10</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kremer%2C+Stéphane%22">Kremer, Stéphane</searchLink><relatesTo>4,9</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22European+Radiology%22">European Radiology</searchLink>. Nov2022, Vol. 32 Issue 11, p7344-7353. 10p. 2 Diagrams, 4 Charts, 2 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Magnetic+resonance+imaging%22">Magnetic resonance imaging</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diplopia%22">Diplopia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dizziness%22">Dizziness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Propensity+score+matching%22">Propensity score matching</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cost+effectiveness%22">Cost effectiveness</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the costs and organizational benefits of diagnostic workup without and with MRI dedicated to the ED. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational uncontrolled before-after study in one ED of a university hospital in France from July 1, 2018, and January 3, 2020. We included all consecutive patients presenting with dizziness or diplopia. The main outcomes were the clinical decision time of ED physicians and the total costs for each strategy. Outcomes were compared using propensity score with inverse probability weighting in the 2 arms and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. Results: Among the 199 patients during the "before" period (average age: 60.4 years ± 17.6): 112 men (57%), and 181 during the "after" period (average age, 54.8 years ± 18.5): 107 men (59%), the average costs were €2701 (95% CI 1918; 3704) and €2389 (95% CI: €1627; 3280) per patient, respectively. The average time to clinical decision was 9.8 h (95% CI: 8.9 10.7) in the group "before" and 7.7 h (95% CI: 7.1; 8.4) in the group "after" (ICER: €151 saved for a reduction of 1 h in clinical decision time). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis estimated a 71% chance that the MRI dedicated to ED was dominant (less costly and more effective). Conclusion: Easy access to MRI in the ED for posterior circulation stroke-like symptoms must be considered a relevant approach to help physicians for an appropriate and rapid diagnostic with reduction of costs. Trial registration: NCT03660852 Key Points: • A dedicated MRI in the ED for diplopia or dizziness may be considered an efficient strategy improving diagnostic performance, reducing physicians' decision time, and decreasing hospital costs. • This strategy supports clinical decision-making with early treatment and management of patients with posterior circulation-like symptoms in the ED. • There is 71% chance that the MRI dedicated to ED was dominant (less costly and more effective) compared with a strategy without dedicated MRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=160256593
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00330-022-08791-7
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 7344
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Magnetic resonance imaging
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Diplopia
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Dizziness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Propensity score matching
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cost effectiveness
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: MRI dedicated to the emergency department for diplopia or dizziness: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kepka, Sabrina
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zarca, Kevin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lersy, François
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Moris, Mylène
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Godet, Julien
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Deur, Jeanne
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stoessel, Marie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Muller, Joris
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Le Borgne, Pierrick
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Baloglu, Seyyid
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fleury, Marie Céline
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Anheim, Mathieu
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bilbault, Pascal
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bierry, Guillaume
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Durand Zaleski, Isabelle
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kremer, Stéphane
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2022
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09387994
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 32
            – Type: issue
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: European Radiology
              Type: main
ResultId 1