View in EDS

Single-Masked Randomized Phase 2 Study Assessing 2 Forms of Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Patients With Large Choroidal Melanomas.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Single-Masked Randomized Phase 2 Study Assessing 2 Forms of Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Patients With Large Choroidal Melanomas.
Authors: Thariat, Juliette1,2,3 (AUTHOR) jthariat@gmail.com, Mathis, Thibaud4,5,6 (AUTHOR), Pace-Loscos, Tanguy7 (AUTHOR), Peyrichon, Marie Laure7 (AUTHOR), Maschi, Celia8 (AUTHOR), Rosier, Laurence9 (AUTHOR), Nguyen, Minh4,5,6 (AUTHOR), Bonnin, Nicolas10 (AUTHOR), Aloi, Deborah7 (AUTHOR), Gastaud, Lauris7 (AUTHOR), Gaucher, David11 (AUTHOR), Caujolle, Jean-Pierre8 (AUTHOR), Château, Yann7 (AUTHOR), Herault, Joel7 (AUTHOR)
Source: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. Oct2023, Vol. 117 Issue 2, p357-369. 13p.
Subjects: Proton therapy, Melanoma, Visual acuity, Enucleation of the eye, Survival rate, Confidence intervals
Abstract: Patients with large uveal melanomas are at major risk of liver metastases. Some patients are reluctant to undergo the standard treatment (ie, immediate enucleation). Proton therapy yields 5-year local control rates and eyeball retention of >85% and ≈20% in large uveal melanomas. Patients with T3/T4 uveal melanomas refusing enucleation were randomized between standard 4 to 13 Gy-fraction or moderately hypofractionated 8 to 6.5 Gy-fraction proton therapy. The main endpoint was the 2-year local recurrence-free survival without enucleation. A single-masked 1:2 randomized phase 2 trial was conducted between 2015 and 2017 with planned endoresection and distance to the posterior pole as strata. Local events were defined as local relapse, or enucleation due to complications or relapse. The 32 patients, with a mean age of 64 years, had T3/4 (N = 17/15), M1 (N = 2) uveal melanomas, of mean tumor diameter and thickness of 16.5 mm and 9.1 mm, and of posterior location in 56.5%. Median follow-up was 56.7 months. The 2-year local recurrence-free survival rate without enucleation was 79% (95% confidence interval, 65%-96%), similar in both arms. There were 9 enucleations, 3 at relapse and 6 for toxicities. Twelve patients had distant metastases. The 2-year-overall survival was 72% (95% confidence interval, 58%-89%). At baseline, visual acuity by average logarithm value of the minimum angle of resolution was 0.68 and 0.70 in the standard and experimental arms, and at last follow-up 2 and 1.7, with mean differences of 1.44 and 1.01, respectively (P =.39). An 8-times 6.5 Gy scheme is feasible without deteriorating local control and with similar toxicity rates in patients with large uveal melanomas. Larger studies incorporating adjuvant treatments are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 170043956
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Single-Masked Randomized Phase 2 Study Assessing 2 Forms of Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Patients With Large Choroidal Melanomas.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thariat%2C+Juliette%22">Thariat, Juliette</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> jthariat@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mathis%2C+Thibaud%22">Mathis, Thibaud</searchLink><relatesTo>4,5,6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pace-Loscos%2C+Tanguy%22">Pace-Loscos, Tanguy</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Peyrichon%2C+Marie+Laure%22">Peyrichon, Marie Laure</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Maschi%2C+Celia%22">Maschi, Celia</searchLink><relatesTo>8</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rosier%2C+Laurence%22">Rosier, Laurence</searchLink><relatesTo>9</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nguyen%2C+Minh%22">Nguyen, Minh</searchLink><relatesTo>4,5,6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bonnin%2C+Nicolas%22">Bonnin, Nicolas</searchLink><relatesTo>10</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Aloi%2C+Deborah%22">Aloi, Deborah</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gastaud%2C+Lauris%22">Gastaud, Lauris</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gaucher%2C+David%22">Gaucher, David</searchLink><relatesTo>11</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Caujolle%2C+Jean-Pierre%22">Caujolle, Jean-Pierre</searchLink><relatesTo>8</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Château%2C+Yann%22">Château, Yann</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Herault%2C+Joel%22">Herault, Joel</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22International+Journal+of+Radiation+Oncology%2C+Biology%2C+Physics%22">International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics</searchLink>. Oct2023, Vol. 117 Issue 2, p357-369. 13p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Proton+therapy%22">Proton therapy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Melanoma%22">Melanoma</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Visual+acuity%22">Visual acuity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Enucleation+of+the+eye%22">Enucleation of the eye</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Survival+rate%22">Survival rate</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Patients with large uveal melanomas are at major risk of liver metastases. Some patients are reluctant to undergo the standard treatment (ie, immediate enucleation). Proton therapy yields 5-year local control rates and eyeball retention of >85% and ≈20% in large uveal melanomas. Patients with T3/T4 uveal melanomas refusing enucleation were randomized between standard 4 to 13 Gy-fraction or moderately hypofractionated 8 to 6.5 Gy-fraction proton therapy. The main endpoint was the 2-year local recurrence-free survival without enucleation. A single-masked 1:2 randomized phase 2 trial was conducted between 2015 and 2017 with planned endoresection and distance to the posterior pole as strata. Local events were defined as local relapse, or enucleation due to complications or relapse. The 32 patients, with a mean age of 64 years, had T3/4 (N = 17/15), M1 (N = 2) uveal melanomas, of mean tumor diameter and thickness of 16.5 mm and 9.1 mm, and of posterior location in 56.5%. Median follow-up was 56.7 months. The 2-year local recurrence-free survival rate without enucleation was 79% (95% confidence interval, 65%-96%), similar in both arms. There were 9 enucleations, 3 at relapse and 6 for toxicities. Twelve patients had distant metastases. The 2-year-overall survival was 72% (95% confidence interval, 58%-89%). At baseline, visual acuity by average logarithm value of the minimum angle of resolution was 0.68 and 0.70 in the standard and experimental arms, and at last follow-up 2 and 1.7, with mean differences of 1.44 and 1.01, respectively (P =.39). An 8-times 6.5 Gy scheme is feasible without deteriorating local control and with similar toxicity rates in patients with large uveal melanomas. Larger studies incorporating adjuvant treatments are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=170043956
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.04.028
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 13
        StartPage: 357
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Proton therapy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Melanoma
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Visual acuity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Enucleation of the eye
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Survival rate
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Single-Masked Randomized Phase 2 Study Assessing 2 Forms of Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Patients With Large Choroidal Melanomas.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Thariat, Juliette
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mathis, Thibaud
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pace-Loscos, Tanguy
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Peyrichon, Marie Laure
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Maschi, Celia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rosier, Laurence
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nguyen, Minh
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bonnin, Nicolas
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Aloi, Deborah
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gastaud, Lauris
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gaucher, David
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Caujolle, Jean-Pierre
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Château, Yann
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Herault, Joel
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Text: Oct2023
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 03603016
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 117
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
              Type: main
ResultId 1