Passive Contribution of ChatGPT to Scientific Papers.
Saved in:
| Title: | Passive Contribution of ChatGPT to Scientific Papers. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Rahimi, Farid1 (AUTHOR) farid.rahimi@anu.edu.au, Talebi Bezmin Abadi, Amin2 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Annals of Biomedical Engineering. Nov2023, Vol. 51 Issue 11, p2340-2350. 11p. |
| Subjects: | International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, ChatGPT, Scholarly publishing, Writing centers, Technical reports, Report writing, Electronic publications |
| Abstract: | Arguably ChatGPT jeopardizes the integrity and validity of the academic publications instead of ethically facilitating them. ChatGPT can apparently fulfill a portion of one of the four authorship criteria set by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), i.e., "drafting." However, the authorship criteria by ICMJE must all be collectively met, not singly or partially. Many published manuscripts or preprints have credited ChatGPT by including it in the author byline, and the academic publishing enterprise seems to be unguided on how to handle such manuscripts. Interestingly, PLoS Digital Health removed ChatGPT off a paper which had ChatGPT listed initially in the author byline of the preprint version. Revised publishing policies are, thus, promptly required to guide a consistent stance regarding ChatGPT or similar artificial content generators. Publishing policies must accord among publishers, preprint servers (https://asapbio.org/preprint-servers), universities, and research institutions worldwide and across different disciplines. Ideally, considering any declaration of the contribution of ChatGPT to writing any scientific article should be recognized as publishing misconduct immediately and be retracted. Meanwhile, all parties involved in the scientific reporting and publishing must be educated about how ChatGPT fails to meet the essential authorship criteria, so that no author must submit a manuscript with ChatGPT contributing as a "co-author." Meanwhile, using ChatGPT for writing laboratory reports or short summaries of experiments may be acceptable, but not for academic publishing or formal scientific reporting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Annals of Biomedical Engineering is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 173151332 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Passive Contribution of ChatGPT to Scientific Papers. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rahimi%2C+Farid%22">Rahimi, Farid</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> farid.rahimi@anu.edu.au</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Talebi+Bezmin+Abadi%2C+Amin%22">Talebi Bezmin Abadi, Amin</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Annals+of+Biomedical+Engineering%22">Annals of Biomedical Engineering</searchLink>. Nov2023, Vol. 51 Issue 11, p2340-2350. 11p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22International+Committee+of+Medical+Journal+Editors%22">International Committee of Medical Journal Editors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22ChatGPT%22">ChatGPT</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scholarly+publishing%22">Scholarly publishing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+centers%22">Writing centers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technical+reports%22">Technical reports</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Report+writing%22">Report writing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+publications%22">Electronic publications</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Arguably ChatGPT jeopardizes the integrity and validity of the academic publications instead of ethically facilitating them. ChatGPT can apparently fulfill a portion of one of the four authorship criteria set by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), i.e., "drafting." However, the authorship criteria by ICMJE must all be collectively met, not singly or partially. Many published manuscripts or preprints have credited ChatGPT by including it in the author byline, and the academic publishing enterprise seems to be unguided on how to handle such manuscripts. Interestingly, PLoS Digital Health removed ChatGPT off a paper which had ChatGPT listed initially in the author byline of the preprint version. Revised publishing policies are, thus, promptly required to guide a consistent stance regarding ChatGPT or similar artificial content generators. Publishing policies must accord among publishers, preprint servers (https://asapbio.org/preprint-servers), universities, and research institutions worldwide and across different disciplines. Ideally, considering any declaration of the contribution of ChatGPT to writing any scientific article should be recognized as publishing misconduct immediately and be retracted. Meanwhile, all parties involved in the scientific reporting and publishing must be educated about how ChatGPT fails to meet the essential authorship criteria, so that no author must submit a manuscript with ChatGPT contributing as a "co-author." Meanwhile, using ChatGPT for writing laboratory reports or short summaries of experiments may be acceptable, but not for academic publishing or formal scientific reporting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Annals of Biomedical Engineering is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=173151332 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10439-023-03260-8 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 2340 Subjects: – SubjectFull: International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Type: general – SubjectFull: ChatGPT Type: general – SubjectFull: Scholarly publishing Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing centers Type: general – SubjectFull: Technical reports Type: general – SubjectFull: Report writing Type: general – SubjectFull: Electronic publications Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Passive Contribution of ChatGPT to Scientific Papers. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rahimi, Farid – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Talebi Bezmin Abadi, Amin IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 11 Text: Nov2023 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00906964 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 51 – Type: issue Value: 11 Titles: – TitleFull: Annals of Biomedical Engineering Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
