Organizational system thinking as a cognitive framework to meet climate targets.
Saved in:
| Title: | Organizational system thinking as a cognitive framework to meet climate targets. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Burato, Matteo1, Tang, Samuel2, Vastola, Vincenzo3, Cenci, Simone1 s.cenci@imperial.ac.uk |
| Source: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 10/10/2023, Vol. 120 Issue 41, p1-12. 34p. |
| Subjects: | Systems theory, Climate change conferences, Paris Agreement (2016), Climate change, Organizational behavior |
| Abstract: | System thinking is a crucial cognitive framework to enable individual pro-environmental behavioral changes. Indeed, a large body of literature has shown a significant and positive association between individuals’ system thinking capacities and perceptions of the threat posed by climate change. However, individual behavioral changes play a limited role in addressing climate change compared to large organizations involved in a significantly larger share of economic activities. Do organizations exhibit system thinking capacities? Here, we conjecture that system thinking is a cognitive framework observable at an aggregated group level and, therefore, organizations, not just individuals, can exhibit characteristic levels of system thinking. We conceptualize a definition of organizational system thinking and develop an empirical method to estimate it using a large body of textual data from business organizations. Then, we show that system thinking organizations are more likely to lower emissions and align them with the pathways required to meet the climate targets set by the Paris Agreement. Finally, we discussed the theoretical and policy implication of our study. Overall, our results suggest that system thinking is a relevant organization-level cognitive framework that can help organizations align their emissions with global climate targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America is the property of National Academy of Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 173960142 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Organizational system thinking as a cognitive framework to meet climate targets. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burato%2C+Matteo%22">Burato, Matteo</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tang%2C+Samuel%22">Tang, Samuel</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vastola%2C+Vincenzo%22">Vastola, Vincenzo</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cenci%2C+Simone%22">Cenci, Simone</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> s.cenci@imperial.ac.uk</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Proceedings+of+the+National+Academy+of+Sciences+of+the+United+States+of+America%22">Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</searchLink>. 10/10/2023, Vol. 120 Issue 41, p1-12. 34p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systems+theory%22">Systems theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Climate+change+conferences%22">Climate change conferences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Paris+Agreement+%282016%29%22">Paris Agreement (2016)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Climate+change%22">Climate change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organizational+behavior%22">Organizational behavior</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: System thinking is a crucial cognitive framework to enable individual pro-environmental behavioral changes. Indeed, a large body of literature has shown a significant and positive association between individuals’ system thinking capacities and perceptions of the threat posed by climate change. However, individual behavioral changes play a limited role in addressing climate change compared to large organizations involved in a significantly larger share of economic activities. Do organizations exhibit system thinking capacities? Here, we conjecture that system thinking is a cognitive framework observable at an aggregated group level and, therefore, organizations, not just individuals, can exhibit characteristic levels of system thinking. We conceptualize a definition of organizational system thinking and develop an empirical method to estimate it using a large body of textual data from business organizations. Then, we show that system thinking organizations are more likely to lower emissions and align them with the pathways required to meet the climate targets set by the Paris Agreement. Finally, we discussed the theoretical and policy implication of our study. Overall, our results suggest that system thinking is a relevant organization-level cognitive framework that can help organizations align their emissions with global climate targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America is the property of National Academy of Sciences and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=173960142 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1073/pnas.2309510120 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 34 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Systems theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Climate change conferences Type: general – SubjectFull: Paris Agreement (2016) Type: general – SubjectFull: Climate change Type: general – SubjectFull: Organizational behavior Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Organizational system thinking as a cognitive framework to meet climate targets. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burato, Matteo – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tang, Samuel – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Vastola, Vincenzo – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cenci, Simone IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 10 M: 10 Text: 10/10/2023 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00278424 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 120 – Type: issue Value: 41 Titles: – TitleFull: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |