Value of a short non-contrast CMR protocol in MINOCA.
Saved in:
| Title: | Value of a short non-contrast CMR protocol in MINOCA. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Gatti, Marco1 (AUTHOR) m.gatti@unito.it, Palmisano, Anna2,3 (AUTHOR), Gerboni, Mattia1 (AUTHOR), Cau, Riccardo4 (AUTHOR), Pintus, Alessandra4 (AUTHOR), Porcu, Michele4 (AUTHOR), Tore, Davide1 (AUTHOR), Vignale, Davide2,3 (AUTHOR), Andreis, Alessandro5 (AUTHOR), Bergamasco, Laura1 (AUTHOR), De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria5 (AUTHOR), Esposito, Antonio2,3 (AUTHOR), Saba, Luca4 (AUTHOR), Fonio, Paolo1 (AUTHOR), Faletti, Riccardo1 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | European Radiology. Feb2024, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p994-1002. 9p. |
| Subjects: | Contrast media, Coronary arteries, Myocardial infarction, Ventricular ejection fraction, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy |
| Abstract: | Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a short non-contrast CMR (ShtCMR) protocol relative to a matched standard comprehensive CMR (StdCMR) protocol in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with a working diagnosis of MINOCA who underwent a StdCMR between January 2019 and December 2020. An expert and a non-expert reader performed a blinded reading with the ShtCMR (long-axis cine images, T2w-STIR, T1- and T2-mapping). A consensus reading of the StdCMR (reference standard) was performed at least 3 months after the ShtCMR reading session. Readers were asked to report the following: (1) diagnosis; (2) level of confidence in their diagnosis with the ShtCMR; (3) number of myocardial segments involved, and (4) functional parameters. Results: A total of 179 patients were enrolled. The ShtCMR lasted 21 ± 9 min and the StdCMR 45 ± 11 min (p < 0.0001). ShtCMR allowed reaching the same diagnosis as StdCMR in 85% of patients when interpreted by expert readers (rising from 66% for poor confidence to 99% for good, p = 0.0001) and in 73% (p = 0.01) by non-expert ones (60% for poor vs 89% for good confidence, p = 0.0001). Overall, the ShtCMR overestimated the ejection fraction, underestimated cardiac volumes (p < 0.01), and underestimated the number of segments involved by pathology (p = 0.0008) when compared with the StdCMR. Conclusion: The ShtCMR was found to be a debatable alternative to the StdCMR in patients with MINOCA. Nevertheless, when an experienced reader reaches a good or very good diagnostic confidence using the ShtCMR, the reader may choose to stop the examination, reducing the length of the CMR without affecting the patient's diagnosis. Clinical relevance statement: A short non-contrast CMR protocol may be a viable alternative to standard protocols in selected CMR studies of patients with MINOCA, allowing for faster diagnosis while reducing time and resources and increasing the number of patients who can be scanned. Key Points: • The ShtCMR lasted 21 ± 9 min and the StdCMR 45 ± 11 min (p < 0.0001). • In 57% of patients with MINOCA, the experienced reader considers that contrast medium is probably not necessary for diagnosis without affecting the patient's diagnosis (99% of agreement rate between ShtCMR and StdCMR). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
Be the first to leave a comment!
