State-based versus event-based specifications for information systems: a comparison of B and eb3.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: State-based versus event-based specifications for information systems: a comparison of B and eb3.
Authors: Fraikin, Benoît1 Benoit.Fraikin@usherbrooke.ca, Frappier, Marc1 Marc.Frappier@usherbrooke.ca, Laleau, Régine2 laleau@univ-paris12.fr
Source: Software & Systems Modeling. Jul2005, Vol. 4 Issue 3, p236-257. 22p.
Subjects: Information technology, Computer systems, Integrated library systems (Computer systems), Data protection, Systems design, Information resources
Abstract: This paper compares two formal methods, B and eb3, for specifying information systems. These two methods are chosen as examples of the state-based paradigm and the event-based paradigm, respectively. The paper considers four viewpoints: functional behavior expression, validation, verification, and evolution. Issues in expressing event ordering constraints, data integrity constraints, and modularity are thereby considered. A simple case study is used to illustrate the comparison, namely, a library management system. Two equivalent specifications are presented using each method. The paper concludes that B and eb3 are complementary. The former is better at expressing complex ordering and static data integrity constraints, whereas the latter provides a simpler, modular, explicit representation of dynamic constraints that are closer to the user’s point of view, while providing loosely coupled definitions of data attributes. The generality of these results from the state-based paradigm and the event-based paradigm perspective are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Software & Systems Modeling is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 17551491
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: State-based versus event-based specifications for information systems: a comparison of B and eb<superscript>3</superscript>.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fraikin%2C+Benoît%22">Fraikin, Benoît</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> Benoit.Fraikin@usherbrooke.ca</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Frappier%2C+Marc%22">Frappier, Marc</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> Marc.Frappier@usherbrooke.ca</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Laleau%2C+Régine%22">Laleau, Régine</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> laleau@univ-paris12.fr</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Software+%26+Systems+Modeling%22">Software & Systems Modeling</searchLink>. Jul2005, Vol. 4 Issue 3, p236-257. 22p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+technology%22">Information technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+systems%22">Computer systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Integrated+library+systems+%28Computer+systems%29%22">Integrated library systems (Computer systems)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+protection%22">Data protection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systems+design%22">Systems design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+resources%22">Information resources</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This paper compares two formal methods, B and eb3, for specifying information systems. These two methods are chosen as examples of the state-based paradigm and the event-based paradigm, respectively. The paper considers four viewpoints: functional behavior expression, validation, verification, and evolution. Issues in expressing event ordering constraints, data integrity constraints, and modularity are thereby considered. A simple case study is used to illustrate the comparison, namely, a library management system. Two equivalent specifications are presented using each method. The paper concludes that B and eb3 are complementary. The former is better at expressing complex ordering and static data integrity constraints, whereas the latter provides a simpler, modular, explicit representation of dynamic constraints that are closer to the user’s point of view, while providing loosely coupled definitions of data attributes. The generality of these results from the state-based paradigm and the event-based paradigm perspective are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Software & Systems Modeling is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=17551491
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10270-005-0083-4
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 22
        StartPage: 236
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Information technology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Integrated library systems (Computer systems)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data protection
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Systems design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Information resources
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: State-based versus event-based specifications for information systems: a comparison of B and eb3.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fraikin, Benoît
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Frappier, Marc
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Laleau, Régine
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul2005
              Type: published
              Y: 2005
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 16191366
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 4
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Software & Systems Modeling
              Type: main
ResultId 1