View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

MR compatible detectors assessment for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: MR compatible detectors assessment for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning.
Authors: Chea, Michel1 (AUTHOR) michel.chea@aphp.fr, Croisé, Mathilde1 (AUTHOR), Huet, Christelle2 (AUTHOR), Bassinet, Céline2 (AUTHOR), Benadjaoud, Mohamed-Amine3 (AUTHOR), Jenny, Catherine1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Radiation Oncology. 3/20/2024, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p1-16. 16p.
Subjects: Magnetic field measurements, Magnetic field effects, Detectors, Ionization chambers, Correction factors
Abstract: Purpose: To assess a large panel of MR compatible detectors on the full range of measurements required for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning by using a specific statistical method represented as a continuum of comparison with the Monte Carlo (MC) TPS calculations. This study also describes the commissioning tests and the secondary MC dose calculation validation. Material and methods: Plans were created on the Viewray TPS to generate MC reference data. Absolute dose points, PDD, profiles and output factors were extracted and compared to measurements performed with ten different detectors: PTW 31010, 31021, 31022, Markus 34045 and Exradin A28 MR ionization chambers, SN Edge shielded diode, PTW 60019 microdiamond, PTW 60023 unshielded diode, EBT3 radiochromic films and LiF µcubes. Three commissioning steps consisted in comparison between calculated and measured dose: the beam model validation, the output calibration verification in four different phantoms and the commissioning tests recommended by the IAEA-TECDOC-1583. Main results: The symmetry for the high resolution detectors was higher than the TPS data of about 1%. The angular responses of the PTW 60023 and the SN Edge were − 6.6 and − 11.9% compared to the PTW 31010 at 60°. The X/Y-left and the Y-right penumbras measured by the high resolution detectors were in good agreement with the TPS values except for the PTW 60023 for large field sizes. For the 0.84 × 0.83 cm2 field size, the mean deviation to the TPS of the uncorrected OF was − 1.7 ± 1.6% against − 4.0 ± 0.6% for the corrected OF whereas we found − 4.8 ± 0.8% for passive dosimeters. The mean absolute dose deviations to the TPS in different phantoms were 0 ± 0.4%, − 1.2 ± 0.6% and 0.5 ± 1.1% for the PTW 31010, PTW 31021 and Exradin A28 MR respectively. Conclusions: The magnetic field effects on the measurements are considerably reduced at low magnetic field. The PTW 31010 ionization chamber can be used with confidence in different phantoms for commissioning and QA tests requiring absolute dose verifications. For relative measurements, the PTW 60019 presented the best agreement for the full range of field size. For the profile assessment, shielded diodes had a behaviour similar to the PTW 60019 and 60023 while the ionization chambers were the most suitable detectors for the symmetry. The output correction factors published by the IAEA TRS 483 seem to be applicable at low magnetic field pending the publication of new MR specific values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Radiation Oncology is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 176181040
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: MR compatible detectors assessment for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chea%2C+Michel%22">Chea, Michel</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> michel.chea@aphp.fr</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Croisé%2C+Mathilde%22">Croisé, Mathilde</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Huet%2C+Christelle%22">Huet, Christelle</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bassinet%2C+Céline%22">Bassinet, Céline</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Benadjaoud%2C+Mohamed-Amine%22">Benadjaoud, Mohamed-Amine</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jenny%2C+Catherine%22">Jenny, Catherine</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Radiation+Oncology%22">Radiation Oncology</searchLink>. 3/20/2024, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p1-16. 16p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Magnetic+field+measurements%22">Magnetic field measurements</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Magnetic+field+effects%22">Magnetic field effects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Detectors%22">Detectors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ionization+chambers%22">Ionization chambers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Correction+factors%22">Correction factors</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: To assess a large panel of MR compatible detectors on the full range of measurements required for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning by using a specific statistical method represented as a continuum of comparison with the Monte Carlo (MC) TPS calculations. This study also describes the commissioning tests and the secondary MC dose calculation validation. Material and methods: Plans were created on the Viewray TPS to generate MC reference data. Absolute dose points, PDD, profiles and output factors were extracted and compared to measurements performed with ten different detectors: PTW 31010, 31021, 31022, Markus 34045 and Exradin A28 MR ionization chambers, SN Edge shielded diode, PTW 60019 microdiamond, PTW 60023 unshielded diode, EBT3 radiochromic films and LiF µcubes. Three commissioning steps consisted in comparison between calculated and measured dose: the beam model validation, the output calibration verification in four different phantoms and the commissioning tests recommended by the IAEA-TECDOC-1583. Main results: The symmetry for the high resolution detectors was higher than the TPS data of about 1%. The angular responses of the PTW 60023 and the SN Edge were − 6.6 and − 11.9% compared to the PTW 31010 at 60°. The X/Y-left and the Y-right penumbras measured by the high resolution detectors were in good agreement with the TPS values except for the PTW 60023 for large field sizes. For the 0.84 × 0.83 cm2 field size, the mean deviation to the TPS of the uncorrected OF was − 1.7 ± 1.6% against − 4.0 ± 0.6% for the corrected OF whereas we found − 4.8 ± 0.8% for passive dosimeters. The mean absolute dose deviations to the TPS in different phantoms were 0 ± 0.4%, − 1.2 ± 0.6% and 0.5 ± 1.1% for the PTW 31010, PTW 31021 and Exradin A28 MR respectively. Conclusions: The magnetic field effects on the measurements are considerably reduced at low magnetic field. The PTW 31010 ionization chamber can be used with confidence in different phantoms for commissioning and QA tests requiring absolute dose verifications. For relative measurements, the PTW 60019 presented the best agreement for the full range of field size. For the profile assessment, shielded diodes had a behaviour similar to the PTW 60019 and 60023 while the ionization chambers were the most suitable detectors for the symmetry. The output correction factors published by the IAEA TRS 483 seem to be applicable at low magnetic field pending the publication of new MR specific values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Radiation Oncology is the property of BioMed Central and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=176181040
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1186/s13014-024-02431-8
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 16
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Magnetic field measurements
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Magnetic field effects
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Detectors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ionization chambers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Correction factors
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: MR compatible detectors assessment for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chea, Michel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Croisé, Mathilde
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Huet, Christelle
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bassinet, Céline
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Benadjaoud, Mohamed-Amine
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jenny, Catherine
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 20
              M: 03
              Text: 3/20/2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1748717X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 19
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Radiation Oncology
              Type: main
ResultId 1