Head-to-head comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of pretreatment patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.
Saved in:
| Title: | Head-to-head comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of pretreatment patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Ma, Jianglei1 (AUTHOR), Yang, Qinqin2 (AUTHOR), Ye, Xiaofei3 (AUTHOR), Xu, Weidong1 (AUTHOR), Chang, Yifan4 (AUTHOR), Chen, Rui4 (AUTHOR), Wang, Ye1 (AUTHOR), Luo, Mengting5 (AUTHOR), Lou, Yihaoyun1 (AUTHOR), Yang, Xuming6 (AUTHOR), Li, Duocai1 (AUTHOR), Xu, Yusi1 (AUTHOR), He, Wei1 (AUTHOR), Cai, Minglei1 (AUTHOR), Cao, Wanli1 (AUTHOR), Ju, Guanqun1 (AUTHOR), Yin, Lei1 (AUTHOR), Wang, Junkai1 (AUTHOR), Ren, Jizhong1 (AUTHOR), Ma, Zifang6 (AUTHOR) 1973639629@qq.com |
| Source: | European Radiology. Jun2024, Vol. 34 Issue 6, p4017-4037. 21p. |
| Subjects: | Prostate-specific membrane antigen, Prostate cancer patients, Prostate cancer, Cancer diagnosis, Lymphatic metastasis, Seminal vesicles |
| Abstract: | Objectives: To compare prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in the diagnosis of pretreatment prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: Pubmed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies published before June 22, 2022. We assessed risk of bias and applicability by using QUADAS-2 tool. Data synthesis was performed with Stata 17.0 software, using the "midas" and "meqrlogit" packages. Results: We included 29 articles focusing on primary cancer detection, 18 articles about primary staging, and two articles containing them both. For PSMA PET versus mpMRI in primary PCa detection, sensitivities and specificities in the per-patient analysis were 0.90 and 0.84 (p<0.0001), and 0.66 and 0.60 (p <0.0001), and in the per-lesion analysis they were 0.79 and 0.78 (p <0.0001), and 0.84 and 0.82 (p <0.0001). For the per-patient analysis of PSMA PET versus mpMRI in primary staging, sensitivities and specificities in extracapsular extension detection were 0.59 and 0.66 (p =0.005), and 0.79 and 0.76 (p =0.0074), and in seminal vesicle infiltration (SVI) detection they were 0.51 and 0.60 (p =0.0008), and 0.93 and 0.96 (p =0.0092). For PSMA PET versus mpMRI in lymph node metastasis (LNM) detection, sensitivities and specificities in the per-patient analysis were 0.68 and 0.46 (p <0.0001), and 0.91 and 0.90 (p =0.81), and in the per-lesion analysis they were 0.67 and 0.36 (p <0.0001), and 0.99 and 0.99 (p =0.18). Conclusion: PSMA PET has higher diagnostic value than mpMRI in the detection of primary PCa. Regarding the primary staging, mpMRI has potential advantages in SVI detection, while PSMA PET has relative advantages in LNM detection. Clinical relevance statement: The integration of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET into the diagnostic pathway may be helpful for improving the accuracy of prostate cancer detection. However, further studies are needed to address the cost implications and evaluate its utility in specific patient populations or clinical scenarios. Moreover, we recommend the combination of PSMA PET and mpMRI for cancer staging. Key Points: • Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET has higher sensitivity and specificity for primary tumor detection in prostate cancer compared to multiparametric MRI. • Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET also has significantly better sensitivity and specificity for lymph node metastases of prostate cancer compared to multiparametric MRI. • Multiparametric MRI has better accuracy for extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle infiltration compared to ate-specific membrane antigen PET. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 177797511 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Head-to-head comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of pretreatment patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ma%2C+Jianglei%22">Ma, Jianglei</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yang%2C+Qinqin%22">Yang, Qinqin</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ye%2C+Xiaofei%22">Ye, Xiaofei</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Xu%2C+Weidong%22">Xu, Weidong</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chang%2C+Yifan%22">Chang, Yifan</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chen%2C+Rui%22">Chen, Rui</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Ye%22">Wang, Ye</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Luo%2C+Mengting%22">Luo, Mengting</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lou%2C+Yihaoyun%22">Lou, Yihaoyun</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yang%2C+Xuming%22">Yang, Xuming</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Li%2C+Duocai%22">Li, Duocai</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Xu%2C+Yusi%22">Xu, Yusi</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22He%2C+Wei%22">He, Wei</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cai%2C+Minglei%22">Cai, Minglei</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cao%2C+Wanli%22">Cao, Wanli</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ju%2C+Guanqun%22">Ju, Guanqun</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yin%2C+Lei%22">Yin, Lei</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Junkai%22">Wang, Junkai</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ren%2C+Jizhong%22">Ren, Jizhong</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ma%2C+Zifang%22">Ma, Zifang</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> 1973639629@qq.com</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22European+Radiology%22">European Radiology</searchLink>. Jun2024, Vol. 34 Issue 6, p4017-4037. 21p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prostate-specific+membrane+antigen%22">Prostate-specific membrane antigen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prostate+cancer+patients%22">Prostate cancer patients</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prostate+cancer%22">Prostate cancer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cancer+diagnosis%22">Cancer diagnosis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lymphatic+metastasis%22">Lymphatic metastasis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Seminal+vesicles%22">Seminal vesicles</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Objectives: To compare prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in the diagnosis of pretreatment prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: Pubmed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies published before June 22, 2022. We assessed risk of bias and applicability by using QUADAS-2 tool. Data synthesis was performed with Stata 17.0 software, using the "midas" and "meqrlogit" packages. Results: We included 29 articles focusing on primary cancer detection, 18 articles about primary staging, and two articles containing them both. For PSMA PET versus mpMRI in primary PCa detection, sensitivities and specificities in the per-patient analysis were 0.90 and 0.84 (p<0.0001), and 0.66 and 0.60 (p <0.0001), and in the per-lesion analysis they were 0.79 and 0.78 (p <0.0001), and 0.84 and 0.82 (p <0.0001). For the per-patient analysis of PSMA PET versus mpMRI in primary staging, sensitivities and specificities in extracapsular extension detection were 0.59 and 0.66 (p =0.005), and 0.79 and 0.76 (p =0.0074), and in seminal vesicle infiltration (SVI) detection they were 0.51 and 0.60 (p =0.0008), and 0.93 and 0.96 (p =0.0092). For PSMA PET versus mpMRI in lymph node metastasis (LNM) detection, sensitivities and specificities in the per-patient analysis were 0.68 and 0.46 (p <0.0001), and 0.91 and 0.90 (p =0.81), and in the per-lesion analysis they were 0.67 and 0.36 (p <0.0001), and 0.99 and 0.99 (p =0.18). Conclusion: PSMA PET has higher diagnostic value than mpMRI in the detection of primary PCa. Regarding the primary staging, mpMRI has potential advantages in SVI detection, while PSMA PET has relative advantages in LNM detection. Clinical relevance statement: The integration of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET into the diagnostic pathway may be helpful for improving the accuracy of prostate cancer detection. However, further studies are needed to address the cost implications and evaluate its utility in specific patient populations or clinical scenarios. Moreover, we recommend the combination of PSMA PET and mpMRI for cancer staging. Key Points: • Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET has higher sensitivity and specificity for primary tumor detection in prostate cancer compared to multiparametric MRI. • Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET also has significantly better sensitivity and specificity for lymph node metastases of prostate cancer compared to multiparametric MRI. • Multiparametric MRI has better accuracy for extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle infiltration compared to ate-specific membrane antigen PET. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=177797511 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s00330-023-10436-2 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 21 StartPage: 4017 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Prostate-specific membrane antigen Type: general – SubjectFull: Prostate cancer patients Type: general – SubjectFull: Prostate cancer Type: general – SubjectFull: Cancer diagnosis Type: general – SubjectFull: Lymphatic metastasis Type: general – SubjectFull: Seminal vesicles Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Head-to-head comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of pretreatment patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ma, Jianglei – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yang, Qinqin – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ye, Xiaofei – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Xu, Weidong – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chang, Yifan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chen, Rui – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wang, Ye – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Luo, Mengting – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lou, Yihaoyun – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yang, Xuming – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Li, Duocai – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Xu, Yusi – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: He, Wei – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cai, Minglei – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cao, Wanli – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ju, Guanqun – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yin, Lei – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wang, Junkai – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ren, Jizhong – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ma, Zifang IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Jun2024 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 09387994 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 34 – Type: issue Value: 6 Titles: – TitleFull: European Radiology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |