A Novel Evaluation Framework for Medical LLMs: Combining Fuzzy Logic and MCDM for Medical Relation and Clinical Concept Extraction.
Saved in:
| Title: | A Novel Evaluation Framework for Medical LLMs: Combining Fuzzy Logic and MCDM for Medical Relation and Clinical Concept Extraction. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Alamoodi, A. H.1,2,3 alamoodi.abdullah91@gmail.com, Zughoul, Omar4, David, Dianese5, Garfan, Salem5, Pamucar, Dragan6,7,8, Albahri, O. S.9,10, Albahri, A. S.11,12, Yussof, Salman1,13, Sharaf, Iman Mohamad14 |
| Source: | Journal of Medical Systems. 8/31/2024, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p1-12. 12p. |
| Subjects: | Research funding, Clinical decision support systems, Natural language processing, Decision making in clinical medicine, Problem solving, Uncertainty, Logic, Conceptual structures, Mathematical models, Case studies, Theory, Medical practice, Evaluation |
| Geographic Terms: | United States |
| Abstract: | Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a crucial element of modern technology, especially in the healthcare sector, which is apparent given the continuous development of large language models (LLMs), which are utilized in various domains, including medical beings. However, when it comes to using these LLMs for the medical domain, there's a need for an evaluation platform to determine their suitability and drive future development efforts. Towards that end, this study aims to address this concern by developing a comprehensive Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach that is specifically designed to evaluate medical LLMs. The success of AI, particularly LLMs, in the healthcare domain, depends on their efficacy, safety, and ethical compliance. Therefore, it is essential to have a robust evaluation framework for their integration into medical contexts. This study proposes using the Fuzzy-Weighted Zero-InConsistency (FWZIC) method extended to p, q-quasirung orthopair fuzzy set (p, q-QROFS) for weighing evaluation criteria. This extension enables the handling of uncertainties inherent in medical decision-making processes. The approach accommodates the imprecise and multifaceted nature of real-world medical data and criteria by incorporating fuzzy logic principles. The MultiAtributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA) method is employed for the assessment of medical LLMs utilized in the case study of this research. The results of this research revealed that "Medical Relation Extraction" criteria with its sub-levels had more importance with (0.504) than "Clinical Concept Extraction" with (0.495). For the LLMs evaluated, out of 6 alternatives, ( A 4 ) "GatorTron S 10B" had the 1st rank as compared to ( A 1 ) "GatorTron 90B" had the 6th rank. The implications of this study extend beyond academic discourse, directly impacting healthcare practices and patient outcomes. The proposed framework can help healthcare professionals make more informed decisions regarding the adoption and utilization of LLMs in medical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Medical Systems is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 179604257 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A Novel Evaluation Framework for Medical LLMs: Combining Fuzzy Logic and MCDM for Medical Relation and Clinical Concept Extraction. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Alamoodi%2C+A%2E+H%2E%22">Alamoodi, A. H.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2,3</relatesTo><i> alamoodi.abdullah91@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zughoul%2C+Omar%22">Zughoul, Omar</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22David%2C+Dianese%22">David, Dianese</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Garfan%2C+Salem%22">Garfan, Salem</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pamucar%2C+Dragan%22">Pamucar, Dragan</searchLink><relatesTo>6,7,8</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Albahri%2C+O%2E+S%2E%22">Albahri, O. S.</searchLink><relatesTo>9,10</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Albahri%2C+A%2E+S%2E%22">Albahri, A. S.</searchLink><relatesTo>11,12</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yussof%2C+Salman%22">Yussof, Salman</searchLink><relatesTo>1,13</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sharaf%2C+Iman+Mohamad%22">Sharaf, Iman Mohamad</searchLink><relatesTo>14</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Medical+Systems%22">Journal of Medical Systems</searchLink>. 8/31/2024, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p1-12. 12p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Clinical+decision+support+systems%22">Clinical decision support systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Natural+language+processing%22">Natural language processing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making+in+clinical+medicine%22">Decision making in clinical medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+solving%22">Problem solving</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Uncertainty%22">Uncertainty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Logic%22">Logic</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conceptual+structures%22">Conceptual structures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematical+models%22">Mathematical models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Case+studies%22">Case studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Theory%22">Theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+practice%22">Medical practice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation%22">Evaluation</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a crucial element of modern technology, especially in the healthcare sector, which is apparent given the continuous development of large language models (LLMs), which are utilized in various domains, including medical beings. However, when it comes to using these LLMs for the medical domain, there's a need for an evaluation platform to determine their suitability and drive future development efforts. Towards that end, this study aims to address this concern by developing a comprehensive Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach that is specifically designed to evaluate medical LLMs. The success of AI, particularly LLMs, in the healthcare domain, depends on their efficacy, safety, and ethical compliance. Therefore, it is essential to have a robust evaluation framework for their integration into medical contexts. This study proposes using the Fuzzy-Weighted Zero-InConsistency (FWZIC) method extended to p, q-quasirung orthopair fuzzy set (p, q-QROFS) for weighing evaluation criteria. This extension enables the handling of uncertainties inherent in medical decision-making processes. The approach accommodates the imprecise and multifaceted nature of real-world medical data and criteria by incorporating fuzzy logic principles. The MultiAtributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA) method is employed for the assessment of medical LLMs utilized in the case study of this research. The results of this research revealed that "Medical Relation Extraction" criteria with its sub-levels had more importance with (0.504) than "Clinical Concept Extraction" with (0.495). For the LLMs evaluated, out of 6 alternatives, ( A 4 ) "GatorTron S 10B" had the 1st rank as compared to ( A 1 ) "GatorTron 90B" had the 6th rank. The implications of this study extend beyond academic discourse, directly impacting healthcare practices and patient outcomes. The proposed framework can help healthcare professionals make more informed decisions regarding the adoption and utilization of LLMs in medical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Medical Systems is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=179604257 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10916-024-02090-y Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 12 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Research funding Type: general – SubjectFull: Clinical decision support systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Natural language processing Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision making in clinical medicine Type: general – SubjectFull: Problem solving Type: general – SubjectFull: Uncertainty Type: general – SubjectFull: Logic Type: general – SubjectFull: Conceptual structures Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematical models Type: general – SubjectFull: Case studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical practice Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: United States Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A Novel Evaluation Framework for Medical LLMs: Combining Fuzzy Logic and MCDM for Medical Relation and Clinical Concept Extraction. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Alamoodi, A. H. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zughoul, Omar – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: David, Dianese – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Garfan, Salem – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Pamucar, Dragan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Albahri, O. S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Albahri, A. S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yussof, Salman – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sharaf, Iman Mohamad IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 31 M: 08 Text: 8/31/2024 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 01485598 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 48 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Medical Systems Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |