Mixed Reality in the Operating Room: A Systematic Review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Mixed Reality in the Operating Room: A Systematic Review.
Authors: Magalhães, Renato1,2 rfm@ess.ipp.pt, Oliveira, Ana3, Terroso, David3, Vilaça, Adélio2, Veloso, Rita1,4, Marques, António1, Pereira, Javier5, Coelho, Luís3,6
Source: Journal of Medical Systems. 8/15/2024, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p1-15. 15p.
Subjects: Computer simulation, Ergonomics, Autonomy (Psychology), Diffusion of innovations, Research funding, Computer-assisted surgery, Systematic reviews, MEDLINE, Thematic analysis, Online information services, Quality assurance, Operating rooms, Augmented reality, Access to information, User interfaces
Geographic Terms: Portugal
Abstract: Mixed Reality is a technology that has gained attention due to its unique capabilities for accessing and visualizing information. When integrated with voice control mechanisms, gestures and even iris movement, it becomes a valuable tool for medicine. These features are particularly appealing for the operating room and surgical learning, where access to information and freedom of hand operation are fundamental. This study examines the most significant research on mixed reality in the operating room over the past five years, to identify the trends, use cases, its applications and limitations. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to answer the research questions established using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcome) framework. Although implementation of Mixed Reality applications in the operations room presents some challenges, when used appropriately, it can yield remarkable results. It can make learning easier, flatten the learning curve for several procedures, and facilitate various aspects of the surgical processes. The articles' conclusions highlight the potential benefits of these innovations in surgical practice while acknowledging the challenges that must be addressed. Technical complexity, equipment costs, and steep learning curves present significant obstacles to the widespread adoption of Mixed Reality and computer-assisted evaluation. The need for more flexible approaches and comprehensive studies is underscored by the specificity of procedures and limited samples sizes. The integration of imaging modalities and innovative functionalities holds promise for clinical applications. However, it is important to consider issues related to usability, bias, and statistical analyses. Mixed Reality offers significant benefits, but there are still open challenges such as ergonomic issues, limited field of view, and battery autonomy that must be addressed to ensure widespread acceptance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Medical Systems is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 179604373
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Mixed Reality in the Operating Room: A Systematic Review.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Magalhães%2C+Renato%22">Magalhães, Renato</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo><i> rfm@ess.ipp.pt</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Oliveira%2C+Ana%22">Oliveira, Ana</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Terroso%2C+David%22">Terroso, David</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vilaça%2C+Adélio%22">Vilaça, Adélio</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Veloso%2C+Rita%22">Veloso, Rita</searchLink><relatesTo>1,4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Marques%2C+António%22">Marques, António</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pereira%2C+Javier%22">Pereira, Javier</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Coelho%2C+Luís%22">Coelho, Luís</searchLink><relatesTo>3,6</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Medical+Systems%22">Journal of Medical Systems</searchLink>. 8/15/2024, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p1-15. 15p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+simulation%22">Computer simulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ergonomics%22">Ergonomics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Autonomy+%28Psychology%29%22">Autonomy (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diffusion+of+innovations%22">Diffusion of innovations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+funding%22">Research funding</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer-assisted+surgery%22">Computer-assisted surgery</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDLINE%22">MEDLINE</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Online+information+services%22">Online information services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quality+assurance%22">Quality assurance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Operating+rooms%22">Operating rooms</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Augmented+reality%22">Augmented reality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Access+to+information%22">Access to information</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22User+interfaces%22">User interfaces</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Portugal%22">Portugal</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Mixed Reality is a technology that has gained attention due to its unique capabilities for accessing and visualizing information. When integrated with voice control mechanisms, gestures and even iris movement, it becomes a valuable tool for medicine. These features are particularly appealing for the operating room and surgical learning, where access to information and freedom of hand operation are fundamental. This study examines the most significant research on mixed reality in the operating room over the past five years, to identify the trends, use cases, its applications and limitations. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to answer the research questions established using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcome) framework. Although implementation of Mixed Reality applications in the operations room presents some challenges, when used appropriately, it can yield remarkable results. It can make learning easier, flatten the learning curve for several procedures, and facilitate various aspects of the surgical processes. The articles' conclusions highlight the potential benefits of these innovations in surgical practice while acknowledging the challenges that must be addressed. Technical complexity, equipment costs, and steep learning curves present significant obstacles to the widespread adoption of Mixed Reality and computer-assisted evaluation. The need for more flexible approaches and comprehensive studies is underscored by the specificity of procedures and limited samples sizes. The integration of imaging modalities and innovative functionalities holds promise for clinical applications. However, it is important to consider issues related to usability, bias, and statistical analyses. Mixed Reality offers significant benefits, but there are still open challenges such as ergonomic issues, limited field of view, and battery autonomy that must be addressed to ensure widespread acceptance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Medical Systems is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=179604373
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10916-024-02095-7
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Computer simulation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ergonomics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Autonomy (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Diffusion of innovations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research funding
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer-assisted surgery
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: MEDLINE
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Online information services
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Quality assurance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Operating rooms
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Augmented reality
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Access to information
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: User interfaces
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Portugal
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Mixed Reality in the Operating Room: A Systematic Review.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Magalhães, Renato
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Oliveira, Ana
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Terroso, David
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Vilaça, Adélio
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Veloso, Rita
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Marques, António
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pereira, Javier
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Coelho, Luís
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 15
              M: 08
              Text: 8/15/2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 01485598
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 48
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Medical Systems
              Type: main
ResultId 1