Current trends in digital twin development, maintenance, and operation: an interview study.
Saved in:
| Title: | Current trends in digital twin development, maintenance, and operation: an interview study. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Muctadir, Hossain Muhammad1 (AUTHOR) h.m.muctadir@tue.nl, Manrique Negrin, David A.1 (AUTHOR), Gunasekaran, Raghavendran2 (AUTHOR), Cleophas, Loek1,3 (AUTHOR), van den Brand, Mark1 (AUTHOR), Haverkort, Boudewijn R.2 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Software & Systems Modeling. Oct2024, Vol. 23 Issue 5, p1275-1305. 31p. |
| Subjects: | Digital twin, Backlash (Engineering), Design services, Research questions, Engineering models |
| Abstract: | Digital twins (DTs) are often defined as a pairing of a physical entity and a corresponding virtual entity (VE), mimicking certain aspects of the former depending on the use-case. In recent years, this concept has facilitated numerous use-cases ranging from design to validation and predictive maintenance of large and small high-tech systems. Various heterogeneous cross-domain models are essential for such systems, and model-driven engineering plays a pivotal role in the design, development, and maintenance of these models. We believe models and model-driven engineering play a similarly crucial role in the context of a VE of a DT. Due to the rapidly growing popularity of DTs and their use in diverse domains and use-cases, the methodologies, tools, and practices for designing, developing, and maintaining the corresponding VEs differ vastly. To better understand these differences and similarities, we performed a semi-structured interview research with 19 professionals from industry and academia who are closely associated with different lifecycle stages of digital twins. In this paper, we present our analysis and findings from this study, which is based on seven research questions. In general, we identified an overall lack of uniformity in terms of the understanding of digital twins and used tools, techniques, and methodologies for the development and maintenance of the corresponding VEs. Furthermore, considering that digital twins are software intensive systems, we recognize a significant growth potential for adopting more software engineering practices, processes, and expertise in various stages of a digital twin's lifecycle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Software & Systems Modeling is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 180168142 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Current trends in digital twin development, maintenance, and operation: an interview study. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Muctadir%2C+Hossain+Muhammad%22">Muctadir, Hossain Muhammad</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> h.m.muctadir@tue.nl</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Manrique Negrin%2C+David+A%2E%22">Manrique Negrin, David A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gunasekaran%2C+Raghavendran%22">Gunasekaran, Raghavendran</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cleophas%2C+Loek%22">Cleophas, Loek</searchLink><relatesTo>1,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22van den Brand%2C+Mark%22">van den Brand, Mark</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Haverkort%2C+Boudewijn+R%2E%22">Haverkort, Boudewijn R.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Software+%26+Systems+Modeling%22">Software & Systems Modeling</searchLink>. Oct2024, Vol. 23 Issue 5, p1275-1305. 31p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Digital+twin%22">Digital twin</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Backlash+%28Engineering%29%22">Backlash (Engineering)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Design+services%22">Design services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+questions%22">Research questions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+models%22">Engineering models</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Digital twins (DTs) are often defined as a pairing of a physical entity and a corresponding virtual entity (VE), mimicking certain aspects of the former depending on the use-case. In recent years, this concept has facilitated numerous use-cases ranging from design to validation and predictive maintenance of large and small high-tech systems. Various heterogeneous cross-domain models are essential for such systems, and model-driven engineering plays a pivotal role in the design, development, and maintenance of these models. We believe models and model-driven engineering play a similarly crucial role in the context of a VE of a DT. Due to the rapidly growing popularity of DTs and their use in diverse domains and use-cases, the methodologies, tools, and practices for designing, developing, and maintaining the corresponding VEs differ vastly. To better understand these differences and similarities, we performed a semi-structured interview research with 19 professionals from industry and academia who are closely associated with different lifecycle stages of digital twins. In this paper, we present our analysis and findings from this study, which is based on seven research questions. In general, we identified an overall lack of uniformity in terms of the understanding of digital twins and used tools, techniques, and methodologies for the development and maintenance of the corresponding VEs. Furthermore, considering that digital twins are software intensive systems, we recognize a significant growth potential for adopting more software engineering practices, processes, and expertise in various stages of a digital twin's lifecycle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Software & Systems Modeling is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=180168142 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10270-024-01167-z Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 31 StartPage: 1275 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Digital twin Type: general – SubjectFull: Backlash (Engineering) Type: general – SubjectFull: Design services Type: general – SubjectFull: Research questions Type: general – SubjectFull: Engineering models Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Current trends in digital twin development, maintenance, and operation: an interview study. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Muctadir, Hossain Muhammad – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Manrique Negrin, David A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gunasekaran, Raghavendran – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cleophas, Loek – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: van den Brand, Mark – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Haverkort, Boudewijn R. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Text: Oct2024 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 16191366 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 23 – Type: issue Value: 5 Titles: – TitleFull: Software & Systems Modeling Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |