View in EDS PDF Full Text

Do Social Media Platforms Have Free Speech Rights to 'Censor' Conservatives?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Do Social Media Platforms Have Free Speech Rights to 'Censor' Conservatives?
Authors: Samuelson, Pamela1 (AUTHOR) pam@law.berkeley.edu
Source: Communications of the ACM. Nov2024, Vol. 67 Issue 11, p24-26. 3p.
Subjects: Social media, Online social networks, Censorship, Conservatives, Freedom of speech, United States. Supreme Court, Moody v. NetChoice LLC
Abstract: The article discusses how the U.S. Supreme Court addressed challenges to Florida and Texas laws prohibiting censorship by social media platforms which moderated user content, particularly targeting claims of bias against conservative viewpoints. In NetChoice v. Moody and NetChoice v. Paxton, the Court affirmed that platforms have First Amendment rights akin to editorial discretion, allowing them to curate or exclude content. While the Court sent the cases back to lower courts for further examination of evidence and the laws’ scope, it emphasized that government efforts to regulate content moderation or impose viewpoint-based restrictions are constitutionally suspect.
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 180796013
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Periodical
PubTypeId: serialPeriodical
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Do Social Media Platforms Have Free Speech Rights to 'Censor' Conservatives?
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Samuelson%2C+Pamela%22">Samuelson, Pamela</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> pam@law.berkeley.edu</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Communications+of+the+ACM%22">Communications of the ACM</searchLink>. Nov2024, Vol. 67 Issue 11, p24-26. 3p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+media%22">Social media</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Online+social+networks%22">Online social networks</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Censorship%22">Censorship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conservatives%22">Conservatives</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Freedom+of+speech%22">Freedom of speech</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%2E+Supreme+Court%22">United States. Supreme Court</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Moody+v%2E+NetChoice+LLC%22">Moody v. NetChoice LLC</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The article discusses how the U.S. Supreme Court addressed challenges to Florida and Texas laws prohibiting censorship by social media platforms which moderated user content, particularly targeting claims of bias against conservative viewpoints. In NetChoice v. Moody and NetChoice v. Paxton, the Court affirmed that platforms have First Amendment rights akin to editorial discretion, allowing them to curate or exclude content. While the Court sent the cases back to lower courts for further examination of evidence and the laws’ scope, it emphasized that government efforts to regulate content moderation or impose viewpoint-based restrictions are constitutionally suspect.
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=180796013
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1145/3689595
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 3
        StartPage: 24
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Social media
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Online social networks
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Censorship
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Conservatives
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Freedom of speech
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United States. Supreme Court
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Moody v. NetChoice LLC
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Do Social Media Platforms Have Free Speech Rights to 'Censor' Conservatives?
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Samuelson, Pamela
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00010782
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 67
            – Type: issue
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Communications of the ACM
              Type: main
ResultId 1