View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Seismic collapse performance assessment of high‐strength steel framed‐tube structures with shear links fabricated using low‐yield‐point steel.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Seismic collapse performance assessment of high‐strength steel framed‐tube structures with shear links fabricated using low‐yield‐point steel.
Authors: Zhang, Hao1,2 (AUTHOR), Su, Mingzhou1,2 (AUTHOR) sumingzhou@xauat.edu.cn, Lian, Ming1,2 (AUTHOR), Jin, Jing1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Structural Design of Tall & Special Buildings. 10/10/2024, Vol. 33 Issue 14, p1-23. 23p.
Subjects: Ground motion, Structural frame models, Earthquake intensity, Earthquake resistant design, Earthquakes, Bolted joints, Earthquake hazard analysis
Abstract: Summary: A high‐strength steel framed‐tube structure with shear links fabricated using low‐yield‐point steel (HSSFTS‐LYPSL) was developed in this study to improve the seismic performance and resilience of the conventional steel framed‐tube structure. When this HSSFTS‐LYPSL is subjected to strong earthquake excitation, its shear links undergo significant plastic deformation to dissipate seismic energy while critical components such as the spandrel beams and columns maintain their elasticity. Furthermore, the replacement of damaged links was facilitated by the use of bolted end‐plate connections. This study designed three typical HSSFTS‐LYPSL examples with 20, 30, and 40 stories to investigate the seismic collapse performances of HSSFTS‐LYPSLs at different seismic intensity levels. Three‐dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis models of these example structures were developed using the OpenSEES software, and the accuracy and effectiveness of the modeling approach was validated by comparing its results with those of quasi‐static tests on sub‐structure assemblies. Next, 40 records each of far‐field and pulse‐type near‐field ground motions were selected and applied with an incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) to obtain response curves for the example structures and calculate their collapse fragility curves and collapse margin ratios (CMRs) utilizing a modified collapse fragility model. Finally, based on the collapse fragility and seismic hazard curves, the seismic collapse risk probability curves of the HSSFTS‐LYPSLs were obtained under far‐ and near‐field earthquakes, revealing that at the maximum considered earthquake level, the CMR values ranged from 5.74 to 7.25 and from 4.85 to 6.67, respectively; at the very rare earthquake (VRE) level, the CMR values ranged from 3.83 to 4.85 and from 3.24 to 4.46, respectively. These results demonstrate that HSSFTS‐LYPSLs exhibit sufficient potential for seismic collapse resistance. As pulse‐type near‐field earthquakes had more significant and adverse impacts on the seismic collapse performances of the HSSFTS‐LYPSLs than far‐field earthquakes, the seismic collapse design of an HSSFTS‐LYPSL should particularly consider the influence of near‐field effects. In addition, the seismic hazard function had a greater effect on the structural seismic collapse risk curves than the collapse fragility function, suggesting that seismic collapse risk curves could provide a comprehensive assessment of HSSFTS‐LYPSL seismic collapse performance. Under far‐ and near‐field earthquakes, the annual collapse risk probabilities of the HSSFTS‐LYPSL examples at the VRE level were within 1.18 × 10−5–4.53 × 10−5, which is below the seismic collapse risk threshold recommended by others, indicating that HSSFTS‐LYPSLs can meet the fourth‐level performance objective of "no collapse failure at the VRE level." However, this study only conducted seismic collapse and risk assessments using example HSSFTS‐LYPSLs; future research will focus on determining the seismic recovery capacities of and developing post‐earthquake repairability methodologies for HSSFTS‐LYPSLs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Structural Design of Tall & Special Buildings is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 181039136
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Seismic collapse performance assessment of high‐strength steel framed‐tube structures with shear links fabricated using low‐yield‐point steel.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhang%2C+Hao%22">Zhang, Hao</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Su%2C+Mingzhou%22">Su, Mingzhou</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> sumingzhou@xauat.edu.cn</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lian%2C+Ming%22">Lian, Ming</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jin%2C+Jing%22">Jin, Jing</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Structural+Design+of+Tall+%26+Special+Buildings%22">Structural Design of Tall & Special Buildings</searchLink>. 10/10/2024, Vol. 33 Issue 14, p1-23. 23p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ground+motion%22">Ground motion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Structural+frame+models%22">Structural frame models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Earthquake+intensity%22">Earthquake intensity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Earthquake+resistant+design%22">Earthquake resistant design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Earthquakes%22">Earthquakes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bolted+joints%22">Bolted joints</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Earthquake+hazard+analysis%22">Earthquake hazard analysis</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Summary: A high‐strength steel framed‐tube structure with shear links fabricated using low‐yield‐point steel (HSSFTS‐LYPSL) was developed in this study to improve the seismic performance and resilience of the conventional steel framed‐tube structure. When this HSSFTS‐LYPSL is subjected to strong earthquake excitation, its shear links undergo significant plastic deformation to dissipate seismic energy while critical components such as the spandrel beams and columns maintain their elasticity. Furthermore, the replacement of damaged links was facilitated by the use of bolted end‐plate connections. This study designed three typical HSSFTS‐LYPSL examples with 20, 30, and 40 stories to investigate the seismic collapse performances of HSSFTS‐LYPSLs at different seismic intensity levels. Three‐dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis models of these example structures were developed using the OpenSEES software, and the accuracy and effectiveness of the modeling approach was validated by comparing its results with those of quasi‐static tests on sub‐structure assemblies. Next, 40 records each of far‐field and pulse‐type near‐field ground motions were selected and applied with an incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) to obtain response curves for the example structures and calculate their collapse fragility curves and collapse margin ratios (CMRs) utilizing a modified collapse fragility model. Finally, based on the collapse fragility and seismic hazard curves, the seismic collapse risk probability curves of the HSSFTS‐LYPSLs were obtained under far‐ and near‐field earthquakes, revealing that at the maximum considered earthquake level, the CMR values ranged from 5.74 to 7.25 and from 4.85 to 6.67, respectively; at the very rare earthquake (VRE) level, the CMR values ranged from 3.83 to 4.85 and from 3.24 to 4.46, respectively. These results demonstrate that HSSFTS‐LYPSLs exhibit sufficient potential for seismic collapse resistance. As pulse‐type near‐field earthquakes had more significant and adverse impacts on the seismic collapse performances of the HSSFTS‐LYPSLs than far‐field earthquakes, the seismic collapse design of an HSSFTS‐LYPSL should particularly consider the influence of near‐field effects. In addition, the seismic hazard function had a greater effect on the structural seismic collapse risk curves than the collapse fragility function, suggesting that seismic collapse risk curves could provide a comprehensive assessment of HSSFTS‐LYPSL seismic collapse performance. Under far‐ and near‐field earthquakes, the annual collapse risk probabilities of the HSSFTS‐LYPSL examples at the VRE level were within 1.18 × 10−5–4.53 × 10−5, which is below the seismic collapse risk threshold recommended by others, indicating that HSSFTS‐LYPSLs can meet the fourth‐level performance objective of "no collapse failure at the VRE level." However, this study only conducted seismic collapse and risk assessments using example HSSFTS‐LYPSLs; future research will focus on determining the seismic recovery capacities of and developing post‐earthquake repairability methodologies for HSSFTS‐LYPSLs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Structural Design of Tall & Special Buildings is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=181039136
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/tal.2128
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 23
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Ground motion
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Structural frame models
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Earthquake intensity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Earthquake resistant design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Earthquakes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Bolted joints
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Earthquake hazard analysis
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Seismic collapse performance assessment of high‐strength steel framed‐tube structures with shear links fabricated using low‐yield‐point steel.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zhang, Hao
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Su, Mingzhou
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lian, Ming
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jin, Jing
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 10
              M: 10
              Text: 10/10/2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 15417794
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 33
            – Type: issue
              Value: 14
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Structural Design of Tall & Special Buildings
              Type: main
ResultId 1