User participation in digital accessibility evaluations: Reviewing methods and implications.
Saved in:
| Title: | User participation in digital accessibility evaluations: Reviewing methods and implications. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Laitano, María Inés1 (AUTHOR) mlaitano02@univ-paris8.fr, Ortiz-Núñez, Roelvis2 (AUTHOR), Stable-Rodríguez, Yudayly3 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Education for Information. May2025, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p73-87. 15p. |
| Subjects: | Web accessibility, Disability determination, Scientific literature, User interfaces, Social impact, Participation |
| Abstract: | Although laws and standardization bodies promote user participation in digital accessibility evaluations, people with disabilities still consider themselves excluded from this process. One reason could be the lack of systematized knowledge about evaluation methods involving users. This article seeks to understand how and for what purpose digital accessibility evaluations with user participation were conducted in the scientific literature from 2018 to 2021. Three types of user participation emerged: 1) user-based usability testing to evaluate task accomplishment, user reactions and interface qualities; 2) interviewing users to assess the local and social factors impacting digital service accessibility; 3) using questionnaires or crowdsourcing to check the compliance of certain interfaces with accessibility standards. Participants are primarily chosen based on their functional impairments and, to a lesser degree, their project-related skills, biographical information, technology habits, among other criteria. The comprehensive user insights gained with these methods are judged to be positive whereas the lack of representativeness of the selected user samples is found to be regrettable. The article finally discusses the definitions of accessibility and disability that underpin these methodologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Education for Information is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 184271826 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: User participation in digital accessibility evaluations: Reviewing methods and implications. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Laitano%2C+María+Inés%22">Laitano, María Inés</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> mlaitano02@univ-paris8.fr</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ortiz-Núñez%2C+Roelvis%22">Ortiz-Núñez, Roelvis</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stable-Rodríguez%2C+Yudayly%22">Stable-Rodríguez, Yudayly</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Education+for+Information%22">Education for Information</searchLink>. May2025, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p73-87. 15p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Web+accessibility%22">Web accessibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Disability+determination%22">Disability determination</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+literature%22">Scientific literature</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22User+interfaces%22">User interfaces</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+impact%22">Social impact</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Participation%22">Participation</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Although laws and standardization bodies promote user participation in digital accessibility evaluations, people with disabilities still consider themselves excluded from this process. One reason could be the lack of systematized knowledge about evaluation methods involving users. This article seeks to understand how and for what purpose digital accessibility evaluations with user participation were conducted in the scientific literature from 2018 to 2021. Three types of user participation emerged: 1) user-based usability testing to evaluate task accomplishment, user reactions and interface qualities; 2) interviewing users to assess the local and social factors impacting digital service accessibility; 3) using questionnaires or crowdsourcing to check the compliance of certain interfaces with accessibility standards. Participants are primarily chosen based on their functional impairments and, to a lesser degree, their project-related skills, biographical information, technology habits, among other criteria. The comprehensive user insights gained with these methods are judged to be positive whereas the lack of representativeness of the selected user samples is found to be regrettable. The article finally discusses the definitions of accessibility and disability that underpin these methodologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Education for Information is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=184271826 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/01678329241300585 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 73 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Web accessibility Type: general – SubjectFull: Disability determination Type: general – SubjectFull: Scientific literature Type: general – SubjectFull: User interfaces Type: general – SubjectFull: Social impact Type: general – SubjectFull: Participation Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: User participation in digital accessibility evaluations: Reviewing methods and implications. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Laitano, María Inés – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ortiz-Núñez, Roelvis – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stable-Rodríguez, Yudayly IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: May2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 01678329 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 41 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Education for Information Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
