View in EDS PDF Full Text

Provocations of Process in Critical Knowledge Organization Work.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Provocations of Process in Critical Knowledge Organization Work.
Authors: Bullard, Julia1 julia.bullard@ubc.ca
Source: Knowledge Organization. 2024, Vol. 51 Issue 8, p660-666. 7p.
Subjects: Knowledge management, Provocation (Behavior), Traditional knowledge, Hypothesis, Information science
Abstract: In this paper, I argue that the most provocative work in critical knowledge organization is happening at the level of process. I present three persistent assumptions about knowledge organization work and current provocations that challenge them. First, that systems should be seamless and not reveal the work behind them. Second, that systems should achieve a single authorial voice through consistency, precedent, and patterns. Third, that knowledge organization systems are best applied with minimal interpretation on the part of the worker. The provocations against each of these assumptions come from current and highly regarded work in the field, indicating greater respect and visibility for the processes behind knowledge organization systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Knowledge Organization is the property of IMR Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 185005504
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Provocations of Process in Critical Knowledge Organization Work.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bullard%2C+Julia%22">Bullard, Julia</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> julia.bullard@ubc.ca</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Knowledge+Organization%22">Knowledge Organization</searchLink>. 2024, Vol. 51 Issue 8, p660-666. 7p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Knowledge+management%22">Knowledge management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Provocation+%28Behavior%29%22">Provocation (Behavior)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Traditional+knowledge%22">Traditional knowledge</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hypothesis%22">Hypothesis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+science%22">Information science</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: In this paper, I argue that the most provocative work in critical knowledge organization is happening at the level of process. I present three persistent assumptions about knowledge organization work and current provocations that challenge them. First, that systems should be seamless and not reveal the work behind them. Second, that systems should achieve a single authorial voice through consistency, precedent, and patterns. Third, that knowledge organization systems are best applied with minimal interpretation on the part of the worker. The provocations against each of these assumptions come from current and highly regarded work in the field, indicating greater respect and visibility for the processes behind knowledge organization systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Knowledge Organization is the property of IMR Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=185005504
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.5771/0943-7444-2024-8-660
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 660
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Knowledge management
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Provocation (Behavior)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Traditional knowledge
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hypothesis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Information science
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Provocations of Process in Critical Knowledge Organization Work.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bullard, Julia
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: 2024
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09437444
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 51
            – Type: issue
              Value: 8
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Knowledge Organization
              Type: main
ResultId 1