Endometrial cancer tissue features clusterization by kurtosis MRI.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Endometrial cancer tissue features clusterization by kurtosis MRI.
Authors: Maiuro, Alessandra1,2 (AUTHOR), Di Stadio, Francesca1 (AUTHOR), Palombo, Marco3,4 (AUTHOR), Ciardiello, Andrea5 (AUTHOR), Satta, Serena6 (AUTHOR), Pernazza, Angelina6 (AUTHOR), Leopizzi, Martina6 (AUTHOR), Rocca, Carlo Della6 (AUTHOR), Catalano, Carlo6 (AUTHOR), Manganaro, Lucia6 (AUTHOR), Capuani, Silvia2,7 (AUTHOR) silvia.capuani@cnr.it
Source: Medical Physics. May2025, Vol. 52 Issue 5, p2898-2908. 11p.
Subjects: Endometrial cancer, Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging, Prognosis, Tissue differentiation, Magnetic resonance imaging, Histopathology, Measuring instruments, Tissue analysis
Abstract: Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecological malignancies and the second most common gynecological malignancy cause of death in women. Heterogeneous tissues with different grades of complexity and different diffusion properties characterize the EC. Several diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (DMRI) protocols have been used to perform a non‐invasive and global evaluation of EC for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. However, the association of a single value for the diffusion coefficient to an EC tissue could be a severe limit for developing a DMRI virtual histology protocol. Purpose: This study evaluates the potential of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and tissue multiple diffusion clusterization in detecting the specific features of healthy/cancer tissue that can be useful in EC diagnosis and prognosis. Methods: Thirty‐eight subjects were analyzed: 18 with a final diagnosis of EC and 20 healthy, asymptomatic, with no history of endometrial pathology and uterine tumor pathology. Diffusion‐weighted Spin‐Echo Echo‐Planar Imaging (DW‐EPI) with TR/TE = 2000 ms/77 ms was used at 3T using six different b‐values: (500, 800, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 2500)s/mm2 along three gradient directions (x, y, z). The decay of the signal in each voxel was used to obtain clusters of different diffusion compartments reflecting tissue heterogeneity. Moreover, using the Kurtosis representation, the parametric maps of the apparent kurtosis (K) and diffusivity (D) coefficients were obtained. The statistical analysis of the differences in the mean value of the parameters obtained in the selected regions of interest (ROIs) in tumor area (T) peritumor area (PT) and healthy tissue was carried out using a Kruskal–Wallis Test. A p‐value < 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference. To validate DKI and multiple diffusion clusterization in the detection of EC and healthy tissue, DMRI results were compared with EC histology. A ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the performance of the clustering feature in differentiating healthy and tumoral tissues. Results: K discriminates the peritumor area (PT) of the tumor from the healthy tissues (p < 0.05) and the area inside the EC (cancerous tissue, p < 0.05). This result is validated and explained by the diffusion clustering, which shows a great variability in K for pathological compared to healthy subjects. Moreover, the standard deviation of K in the cluster defined by the highest K/D ratio differentiates T and H ROIs. Conclusions: K as well as diffusion clusterization are sensitive to the different microstructural organizations in EC and healthy tissue, promoting themself as a potential tool for the diagnosis and prognosis of EC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Medical Physics is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 185030453
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Endometrial cancer tissue features clusterization by kurtosis MRI.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Maiuro%2C+Alessandra%22&quot;&gt;Maiuro, Alessandra&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1,2&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Di+Stadio%2C+Francesca%22&quot;&gt;Di Stadio, Francesca&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Palombo%2C+Marco%22&quot;&gt;Palombo, Marco&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;3,4&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Ciardiello%2C+Andrea%22&quot;&gt;Ciardiello, Andrea&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;5&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Satta%2C+Serena%22&quot;&gt;Satta, Serena&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;6&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Pernazza%2C+Angelina%22&quot;&gt;Pernazza, Angelina&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;6&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Leopizzi%2C+Martina%22&quot;&gt;Leopizzi, Martina&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;6&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Rocca%2C+Carlo+Della%22&quot;&gt;Rocca, Carlo Della&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;6&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Catalano%2C+Carlo%22&quot;&gt;Catalano, Carlo&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;6&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Manganaro%2C+Lucia%22&quot;&gt;Manganaro, Lucia&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;6&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Capuani%2C+Silvia%22&quot;&gt;Capuani, Silvia&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;2,7&lt;/relatesTo&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;i&gt; silvia.capuani@cnr.it&lt;/i&gt;
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Medical+Physics%22&quot;&gt;Medical Physics&lt;/searchLink&gt;. May2025, Vol. 52 Issue 5, p2898-2908. 11p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Endometrial+cancer%22&quot;&gt;Endometrial cancer&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Diffusion+magnetic+resonance+imaging%22&quot;&gt;Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Prognosis%22&quot;&gt;Prognosis&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Tissue+differentiation%22&quot;&gt;Tissue differentiation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Magnetic+resonance+imaging%22&quot;&gt;Magnetic resonance imaging&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Histopathology%22&quot;&gt;Histopathology&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Measuring+instruments%22&quot;&gt;Measuring instruments&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Tissue+analysis%22&quot;&gt;Tissue analysis&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecological malignancies and the second most common gynecological malignancy cause of death in women. Heterogeneous tissues with different grades of complexity and different diffusion properties characterize the EC. Several diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (DMRI) protocols have been used to perform a non‐invasive and global evaluation of EC for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. However, the association of a single value for the diffusion coefficient to an EC tissue could be a severe limit for developing a DMRI virtual histology protocol. Purpose: This study evaluates the potential of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and tissue multiple diffusion clusterization in detecting the specific features of healthy/cancer tissue that can be useful in EC diagnosis and prognosis. Methods: Thirty‐eight subjects were analyzed: 18 with a final diagnosis of EC and 20 healthy, asymptomatic, with no history of endometrial pathology and uterine tumor pathology. Diffusion‐weighted Spin‐Echo Echo‐Planar Imaging (DW‐EPI) with TR/TE = 2000 ms/77 ms was used at 3T using six different b‐values: (500, 800, 1000, 1500, 2000, and 2500)s/mm2 along three gradient directions (x, y, z). The decay of the signal in each voxel was used to obtain clusters of different diffusion compartments reflecting tissue heterogeneity. Moreover, using the Kurtosis representation, the parametric maps of the apparent kurtosis (K) and diffusivity (D) coefficients were obtained. The statistical analysis of the differences in the mean value of the parameters obtained in the selected regions of interest (ROIs) in tumor area (T) peritumor area (PT) and healthy tissue was carried out using a Kruskal–Wallis Test. A p‐value &lt; 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference. To validate DKI and multiple diffusion clusterization in the detection of EC and healthy tissue, DMRI results were compared with EC histology. A ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the performance of the clustering feature in differentiating healthy and tumoral tissues. Results: K discriminates the peritumor area (PT) of the tumor from the healthy tissues (p &lt; 0.05) and the area inside the EC (cancerous tissue, p &lt; 0.05). This result is validated and explained by the diffusion clustering, which shows a great variability in K for pathological compared to healthy subjects. Moreover, the standard deviation of K in the cluster defined by the highest K/D ratio differentiates T and H ROIs. Conclusions: K as well as diffusion clusterization are sensitive to the different microstructural organizations in EC and healthy tissue, promoting themself as a potential tool for the diagnosis and prognosis of EC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Medical Physics is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=185030453
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/mp.17718
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 2898
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Endometrial cancer
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Prognosis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Tissue differentiation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Magnetic resonance imaging
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Histopathology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Measuring instruments
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Tissue analysis
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Endometrial cancer tissue features clusterization by kurtosis MRI.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Maiuro, Alessandra
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Di Stadio, Francesca
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Palombo, Marco
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ciardiello, Andrea
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Satta, Serena
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pernazza, Angelina
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Leopizzi, Martina
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rocca, Carlo Della
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Catalano, Carlo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Manganaro, Lucia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Capuani, Silvia
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Text: May2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00942405
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 52
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Medical Physics
              Type: main
ResultId 1