Verification of dose and dose rate for quality assurance of spread‐out‐Bragg‐peak proton FLASH radiotherapy using machine log files.
Saved in:
| Title: | Verification of dose and dose rate for quality assurance of spread‐out‐Bragg‐peak proton FLASH radiotherapy using machine log files. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Oliaei Motlagh, Seyyedeh Azar1 (AUTHOR), Vander Stappen, François2 (AUTHOR), Kim, Michele M.1 (AUTHOR), Labarbe, Rudi2 (AUTHOR), Hotoiu, Lucian2 (AUTHOR), Pin, Arnaud2 (AUTHOR), Nilsson, Rasmus3 (AUTHOR), Traneus, Erik3 (AUTHOR), Cengel, Keith A.1 (AUTHOR), Zou, Wei1 (AUTHOR), Teo, Boon‐Keng Kevin1 (AUTHOR), Dong, Lei1 (AUTHOR), Diffenderfer, Eric S.1 (AUTHOR) Eric.Diffenderfer@pennmedicine.upenn.edu |
| Source: | Medical Physics. Jun2025, Vol. 52 Issue 6, p5005-5016. 12p. |
| Subjects: | Proton therapy, Quality assurance, Machine performance, Monte Carlo method, Radiotherapy |
| Abstract: | Background: Ultra‐high dose rate radiotherapy elicits a biological effect (FLASH), which has been shown to reduce toxicity while maintaining tumor control in preclinical radiobiology experiments. FLASH depends on the dose rate, with evidence that higher dose rates drive increased normal tissue sparing. The pattern of dose delivery also has significance for conformal proton FLASH delivered via pencil beam scanning (PBS) given its unique spatio‐temporal distribution of dose deposition. Purpose: In PBS, the machine‐generated log file contains information on the spatio‐temporal pattern of PBS delivery measured by the segmented ionization chambers in the treatment nozzle. The spot position and monitor unit (MU) obtained from log files have previously been used to reconstruct the treatment dose by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The incorporation of spot timing allows reconstruction of the 3D temporal dose distribution. The log‐based dose and dose rate can have a role in quality assurance (QA) and FLASH treatment verification if the reconstruction can be shown to be accurate in spatial and temporal domains of dose deposition. Thus, the objective of this study is to validate the accuracy of dose rate reconstruction using input data from machine log files of PBS delivery. By analyzing the delivered spot timing, position, and MU extracted from the logs, we aim to evaluate the reliability and precision of the log data for dose and dose rate reconstruction. Methods: FLASH PBS spread‐out Bragg peak (SOBP) treatment fields were delivered using a cyclotron accelerated proton beam. This method involves a patient and field‐specific conformal energy modulator (CEM) to achieve a SOBP at the tumor site. Log files record spot positions and the delivered MU with timing information at 250 µs resolution. To validate timing information, a 9.9 mm diameter parallel plate ionization chamber was positioned at various locations within the SOBP. An electrometer sampling at 20 kHz recorded the time‐resolved ionization current collected by the ionization chamber. These measurements were used to determine spot dose, dose rate, duration, and transition times. Disparities between the measured and logged spot map MU and timing were determined. Dose average and PBS dose rates were compared between the measurement and log‐based MC simulations. Results: There was a good agreement between the measured dwell time and transition time and the logged information across various detector positions. The median disparities for inter‐spot dwell time range from ‐0.041 to 0.024 ms. Differences between logged and planned spot positions are minimal, measuring less than 1.08 mm in the x direction and 1.15 mm in the y direction, consistent with prior studies and the spatial resolution of the PBS nozzle ionization chamber. Delivered MU were within 1.9% of the planned MU. Measured dose and dose rates are consistent with simulated outcomes derived from MC simulation. Conclusion: We validated the precision and accuracy of PBS log file data through measurements and MC simulations. These findings support the use of log files in MC calculations as one part of patient‐specific quality assurance (PSQA) and dose rate delivery verification for conformal proton FLASH radiotherapy with SOBP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Medical Physics is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 185839803 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Verification of dose and dose rate for quality assurance of spread‐out‐Bragg‐peak proton FLASH radiotherapy using machine log files. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Oliaei+Motlagh%2C+Seyyedeh+Azar%22">Oliaei Motlagh, Seyyedeh Azar</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vander+Stappen%2C+François%22">Vander Stappen, François</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kim%2C+Michele+M%2E%22">Kim, Michele M.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Labarbe%2C+Rudi%22">Labarbe, Rudi</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hotoiu%2C+Lucian%22">Hotoiu, Lucian</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pin%2C+Arnaud%22">Pin, Arnaud</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nilsson%2C+Rasmus%22">Nilsson, Rasmus</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Traneus%2C+Erik%22">Traneus, Erik</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cengel%2C+Keith+A%2E%22">Cengel, Keith A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zou%2C+Wei%22">Zou, Wei</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Teo%2C+Boon‐Keng+Kevin%22">Teo, Boon‐Keng Kevin</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dong%2C+Lei%22">Dong, Lei</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Diffenderfer%2C+Eric+S%2E%22">Diffenderfer, Eric S.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> Eric.Diffenderfer@pennmedicine.upenn.edu</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Medical+Physics%22">Medical Physics</searchLink>. Jun2025, Vol. 52 Issue 6, p5005-5016. 12p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Proton+therapy%22">Proton therapy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quality+assurance%22">Quality assurance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Machine+performance%22">Machine performance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Monte+Carlo+method%22">Monte Carlo method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Radiotherapy%22">Radiotherapy</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Ultra‐high dose rate radiotherapy elicits a biological effect (FLASH), which has been shown to reduce toxicity while maintaining tumor control in preclinical radiobiology experiments. FLASH depends on the dose rate, with evidence that higher dose rates drive increased normal tissue sparing. The pattern of dose delivery also has significance for conformal proton FLASH delivered via pencil beam scanning (PBS) given its unique spatio‐temporal distribution of dose deposition. Purpose: In PBS, the machine‐generated log file contains information on the spatio‐temporal pattern of PBS delivery measured by the segmented ionization chambers in the treatment nozzle. The spot position and monitor unit (MU) obtained from log files have previously been used to reconstruct the treatment dose by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The incorporation of spot timing allows reconstruction of the 3D temporal dose distribution. The log‐based dose and dose rate can have a role in quality assurance (QA) and FLASH treatment verification if the reconstruction can be shown to be accurate in spatial and temporal domains of dose deposition. Thus, the objective of this study is to validate the accuracy of dose rate reconstruction using input data from machine log files of PBS delivery. By analyzing the delivered spot timing, position, and MU extracted from the logs, we aim to evaluate the reliability and precision of the log data for dose and dose rate reconstruction. Methods: FLASH PBS spread‐out Bragg peak (SOBP) treatment fields were delivered using a cyclotron accelerated proton beam. This method involves a patient and field‐specific conformal energy modulator (CEM) to achieve a SOBP at the tumor site. Log files record spot positions and the delivered MU with timing information at 250 µs resolution. To validate timing information, a 9.9 mm diameter parallel plate ionization chamber was positioned at various locations within the SOBP. An electrometer sampling at 20 kHz recorded the time‐resolved ionization current collected by the ionization chamber. These measurements were used to determine spot dose, dose rate, duration, and transition times. Disparities between the measured and logged spot map MU and timing were determined. Dose average and PBS dose rates were compared between the measurement and log‐based MC simulations. Results: There was a good agreement between the measured dwell time and transition time and the logged information across various detector positions. The median disparities for inter‐spot dwell time range from ‐0.041 to 0.024 ms. Differences between logged and planned spot positions are minimal, measuring less than 1.08 mm in the x direction and 1.15 mm in the y direction, consistent with prior studies and the spatial resolution of the PBS nozzle ionization chamber. Delivered MU were within 1.9% of the planned MU. Measured dose and dose rates are consistent with simulated outcomes derived from MC simulation. Conclusion: We validated the precision and accuracy of PBS log file data through measurements and MC simulations. These findings support the use of log files in MC calculations as one part of patient‐specific quality assurance (PSQA) and dose rate delivery verification for conformal proton FLASH radiotherapy with SOBP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Medical Physics is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=185839803 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/mp.17792 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 12 StartPage: 5005 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Proton therapy Type: general – SubjectFull: Quality assurance Type: general – SubjectFull: Machine performance Type: general – SubjectFull: Monte Carlo method Type: general – SubjectFull: Radiotherapy Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Verification of dose and dose rate for quality assurance of spread‐out‐Bragg‐peak proton FLASH radiotherapy using machine log files. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Oliaei Motlagh, Seyyedeh Azar – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Vander Stappen, François – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kim, Michele M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Labarbe, Rudi – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hotoiu, Lucian – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Pin, Arnaud – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nilsson, Rasmus – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Traneus, Erik – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cengel, Keith A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zou, Wei – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Teo, Boon‐Keng Kevin – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dong, Lei – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Diffenderfer, Eric S. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Jun2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00942405 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 52 – Type: issue Value: 6 Titles: – TitleFull: Medical Physics Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |