Ovarian cancer staging and follow-up: updated guidelines from the European Society of Urogenital Radiology female pelvic imaging working group.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Ovarian cancer staging and follow-up: updated guidelines from the European Society of Urogenital Radiology female pelvic imaging working group.
Authors: Rizzo, Stefania1,2 (AUTHOR), Avesani, Giacomo3 (AUTHOR) giacomo.avesani@policlinicogemelli.it, Panico, Camilla3 (AUTHOR), Manganaro, Lucia4 (AUTHOR), Gui, Benedetta3 (AUTHOR), Lakhman, Yulia5 (AUTHOR), Andrieu, Pamela Causa6 (AUTHOR), Bharwani, Nishat7 (AUTHOR), Rockall, Andrea8 (AUTHOR), Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle9 (AUTHOR), Cunha, Teresa Margarida10 (AUTHOR), Sala, Evis3 (AUTHOR), Forstner, Rosemarie11 (AUTHOR), Nougaret, Stephanie12 (AUTHOR)
Source: European Radiology. Jul2025, Vol. 35 Issue 7, p4029-4039. 11p.
Subjects: Ovarian cancer, Diagnostic imaging, Computed tomography, Magnetic resonance imaging, Scientific observation, Best practices, Disease relapse, Diagnosis
Abstract: Objective: To provide up-to-date European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines for staging and follow-up of patients with ovarian cancer (OC). Methods: Twenty-one experts, members of the female pelvis imaging ESUR subcommittee from 19 institutions, replied to 2 rounds of questionnaires regarding imaging techniques and structured reporting used for pre-treatment evaluation of OC patients. The results of the survey were presented to the other authors during the group's annual meeting. The lexicon was aligned with the Society of American Radiology (SAR)-ESUR lexicon; a first draft was circulated, and then comments and suggestions from the other authors were incorporated. Results: Evaluation of disease extent at diagnosis should be performed by chest, abdominal, and pelvic CT. The radiological report should map the disease with specific mention of sites that may preclude optimal cytoreductive surgery. For suspected recurrence, CT and [18F]FDG PET-CT are both valid options. MRI can be considered in experienced centres, as an alternative to CT, considering the high costs and the need for higher expertise in reporting. Conclusions: CT is the imaging modality of choice for preoperative evaluation and follow-up in OC patients. A structured radiological report, including specific mention of sites that may preclude optimal debulking, is of value for patient management. Key Points: QuestionGuidelines were last published for ovarian cancer (OC) imaging in 2010; here, guidance on imaging techniques and reporting, incorporating advances in the field, are provided. FindingsStructured reports should map out sites of disease, highlighting sites that limit cytoreduction. For suspected recurrence, CT and 18FDG PET-CT are options, and MRI can be considered. Clinical relevanceImaging evaluation of OC patients at initial diagnosis (mainly based on CT), using a structured report that considers surgical needs is valuable in treatment selection and planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 185942203
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Ovarian cancer staging and follow-up: updated guidelines from the European Society of Urogenital Radiology female pelvic imaging working group.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rizzo%2C+Stefania%22">Rizzo, Stefania</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Avesani%2C+Giacomo%22">Avesani, Giacomo</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> giacomo.avesani@policlinicogemelli.it</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Panico%2C+Camilla%22">Panico, Camilla</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Manganaro%2C+Lucia%22">Manganaro, Lucia</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gui%2C+Benedetta%22">Gui, Benedetta</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lakhman%2C+Yulia%22">Lakhman, Yulia</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andrieu%2C+Pamela+Causa%22">Andrieu, Pamela Causa</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bharwani%2C+Nishat%22">Bharwani, Nishat</searchLink><relatesTo>7</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rockall%2C+Andrea%22">Rockall, Andrea</searchLink><relatesTo>8</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thomassin-Naggara%2C+Isabelle%22">Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle</searchLink><relatesTo>9</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cunha%2C+Teresa+Margarida%22">Cunha, Teresa Margarida</searchLink><relatesTo>10</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sala%2C+Evis%22">Sala, Evis</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Forstner%2C+Rosemarie%22">Forstner, Rosemarie</searchLink><relatesTo>11</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nougaret%2C+Stephanie%22">Nougaret, Stephanie</searchLink><relatesTo>12</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22European+Radiology%22">European Radiology</searchLink>. Jul2025, Vol. 35 Issue 7, p4029-4039. 11p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ovarian+cancer%22">Ovarian cancer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diagnostic+imaging%22">Diagnostic imaging</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computed+tomography%22">Computed tomography</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Magnetic+resonance+imaging%22">Magnetic resonance imaging</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+observation%22">Scientific observation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Best+practices%22">Best practices</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Disease+relapse%22">Disease relapse</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diagnosis%22">Diagnosis</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objective: To provide up-to-date European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines for staging and follow-up of patients with ovarian cancer (OC). Methods: Twenty-one experts, members of the female pelvis imaging ESUR subcommittee from 19 institutions, replied to 2 rounds of questionnaires regarding imaging techniques and structured reporting used for pre-treatment evaluation of OC patients. The results of the survey were presented to the other authors during the group's annual meeting. The lexicon was aligned with the Society of American Radiology (SAR)-ESUR lexicon; a first draft was circulated, and then comments and suggestions from the other authors were incorporated. Results: Evaluation of disease extent at diagnosis should be performed by chest, abdominal, and pelvic CT. The radiological report should map the disease with specific mention of sites that may preclude optimal cytoreductive surgery. For suspected recurrence, CT and [18F]FDG PET-CT are both valid options. MRI can be considered in experienced centres, as an alternative to CT, considering the high costs and the need for higher expertise in reporting. Conclusions: CT is the imaging modality of choice for preoperative evaluation and follow-up in OC patients. A structured radiological report, including specific mention of sites that may preclude optimal debulking, is of value for patient management. Key Points: QuestionGuidelines were last published for ovarian cancer (OC) imaging in 2010; here, guidance on imaging techniques and reporting, incorporating advances in the field, are provided. FindingsStructured reports should map out sites of disease, highlighting sites that limit cytoreduction. For suspected recurrence, CT and 18FDG PET-CT are options, and MRI can be considered. Clinical relevanceImaging evaluation of OC patients at initial diagnosis (mainly based on CT), using a structured report that considers surgical needs is valuable in treatment selection and planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=185942203
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00330-024-11300-7
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 4029
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Ovarian cancer
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Diagnostic imaging
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computed tomography
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Magnetic resonance imaging
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scientific observation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Best practices
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Disease relapse
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Diagnosis
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Ovarian cancer staging and follow-up: updated guidelines from the European Society of Urogenital Radiology female pelvic imaging working group.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rizzo, Stefania
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Avesani, Giacomo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Panico, Camilla
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Manganaro, Lucia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gui, Benedetta
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lakhman, Yulia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Andrieu, Pamela Causa
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bharwani, Nishat
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rockall, Andrea
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cunha, Teresa Margarida
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sala, Evis
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Forstner, Rosemarie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nougaret, Stephanie
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09387994
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 35
            – Type: issue
              Value: 7
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: European Radiology
              Type: main
ResultId 1