Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT on Board-Style Examination Questions in Ophthalmology: A Meta-Analysis.
Saved in:
| Title: | Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT on Board-Style Examination Questions in Ophthalmology: A Meta-Analysis. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Wei, Jiawen1, Wang, Xiaoyan1, Huang, Mingxue1, Xu, Yanwu2,3, Yang, Weihua4 benben0606@139.com |
| Source: | Journal of Medical Systems. 7/5/2025, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p1-13. 13p. |
| Subjects: | Generative artificial intelligence, Medical information storage & retrieval systems, Language & languages, Optics, Family medicine, Medical education, Professional licensure examinations, Meta-analysis, Descriptive statistics, Natural language processing, Educational tests & measurements, Ophthalmology, Systematic reviews, MEDLINE, Medical databases, Online information services, Quality assurance, Digital image processing, Evidence-based medicine, Confidence intervals, Communication barriers |
| Abstract (English): | To review empirical research on ChatGPT's accuracy in answering ophthalmology board-style examination questions up to March 2025 and to analyze the effects of GPT versions, question types, language differences, and ophthalmology topics on accuracy. A search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library in March 2025. Two authors extracted data and independently assessed study quality. Accuracy rates were calculated with Stata 17.0. GPT-4 had an integrated accuracy of 73%, higher than GPT-3.5's 54%. It scored 77% in text and 55% in image tasks. GPT-4's accuracy was 73% in English-speaking countries and 71% in non-English ones. In ophthalmology, General Medicine achieved the highest accuracy (80%), while Clinical Optics had the lowest performance (55%). GPT-4 outperforms GPT-3.5, but its image processing capability needs further validation. Performance varies by language and topic, suggesting the need for more research on cross-linguistic efficacy and error analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (German): | Clinical Trial Number: Not applicable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Medical Systems is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 186463869 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT on Board-Style Examination Questions in Ophthalmology: A Meta-Analysis. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wei%2C+Jiawen%22">Wei, Jiawen</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Xiaoyan%22">Wang, Xiaoyan</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Huang%2C+Mingxue%22">Huang, Mingxue</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Xu%2C+Yanwu%22">Xu, Yanwu</searchLink><relatesTo>2,3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yang%2C+Weihua%22">Yang, Weihua</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo><i> benben0606@139.com</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Medical+Systems%22">Journal of Medical Systems</searchLink>. 7/5/2025, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p1-13. 13p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Generative+artificial+intelligence%22">Generative artificial intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Medical information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+%26+languages%22">Language & languages</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Optics%22">Optics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Family+medicine%22">Family medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+education%22">Medical education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+licensure+examinations%22">Professional licensure examinations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Meta-analysis%22">Meta-analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Descriptive+statistics%22">Descriptive statistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Natural+language+processing%22">Natural language processing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+tests+%26+measurements%22">Educational tests & measurements</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ophthalmology%22">Ophthalmology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDLINE%22">MEDLINE</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+databases%22">Medical databases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Online+information+services%22">Online information services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quality+assurance%22">Quality assurance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Digital+image+processing%22">Digital image processing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence-based+medicine%22">Evidence-based medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+intervals%22">Confidence intervals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communication+barriers%22">Communication barriers</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (English) Group: Ab Data: To review empirical research on ChatGPT's accuracy in answering ophthalmology board-style examination questions up to March 2025 and to analyze the effects of GPT versions, question types, language differences, and ophthalmology topics on accuracy. A search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library in March 2025. Two authors extracted data and independently assessed study quality. Accuracy rates were calculated with Stata 17.0. GPT-4 had an integrated accuracy of 73%, higher than GPT-3.5's 54%. It scored 77% in text and 55% in image tasks. GPT-4's accuracy was 73% in English-speaking countries and 71% in non-English ones. In ophthalmology, General Medicine achieved the highest accuracy (80%), while Clinical Optics had the lowest performance (55%). GPT-4 outperforms GPT-3.5, but its image processing capability needs further validation. Performance varies by language and topic, suggesting the need for more research on cross-linguistic efficacy and error analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (German) Group: Ab Data: Clinical Trial Number: Not applicable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Medical Systems is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=186463869 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10916-025-02227-7 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Generative artificial intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical information storage & retrieval systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Language & languages Type: general – SubjectFull: Optics Type: general – SubjectFull: Family medicine Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical education Type: general – SubjectFull: Professional licensure examinations Type: general – SubjectFull: Meta-analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Descriptive statistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Natural language processing Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational tests & measurements Type: general – SubjectFull: Ophthalmology Type: general – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews Type: general – SubjectFull: MEDLINE Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical databases Type: general – SubjectFull: Online information services Type: general – SubjectFull: Quality assurance Type: general – SubjectFull: Digital image processing Type: general – SubjectFull: Evidence-based medicine Type: general – SubjectFull: Confidence intervals Type: general – SubjectFull: Communication barriers Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT on Board-Style Examination Questions in Ophthalmology: A Meta-Analysis. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wei, Jiawen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wang, Xiaoyan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Huang, Mingxue – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Xu, Yanwu – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yang, Weihua IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 05 M: 07 Text: 7/5/2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 01485598 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 49 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Medical Systems Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |