View in EDS PDF Full Text

Serious mistakes associated with Einstein’s E = mc² equation are brought to light.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Serious mistakes associated with Einstein’s E = mc² equation are brought to light.
Authors: Ghoshala, Suniti K.1 sunitikghoshal@gmail.com
Source: Physics Essays. Jun2025, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p107-111. 5p.
Subjects: Lorentz transformations, Conservation laws (Physics), Special relativity (Physics), Mathematical errors, Einstein, Albert, 1879-1955, Causality (Physics), Physicists
Abstract (English): A thorough scrutiny of Einstein’s derivation of the mass–energy equivalence (MEE) equation reveals that the MEE equation derivation is based on conceptually as well as mathematically incorrect concepts. The mistaken application of the Lorentz transformation factor, which has now been conclusively proven to be incorrect, as an indispensable mathematical tool has been shown to be crucial. A critical review of the purported interconversions between mass and energy that the MEE principle asserts conclusively proves that the occurrence of such interconversions could take place only through violating the well-established laws of nature—the law of conservation of energy and the law of conservation of mass. The theory has also been shown to not be in conformity with the principle of causality. A thorough analysis of the conceptual foundation of E ¼ mc² yields a host of conflicting and self-contradictory consequences, providing convincing evidence that E ¼ mc² is not the correct equation. It is concluded that the MEE equation cannot be justified to be correct by any physical reasonings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (French): Un examen approfondi de la derivation d’Einstein de l’equation d’equivalence masse- energie (MEE) reve`le que la derivation de l’equation MEE est basee sur des concepts conceptuellement et mathematiquement incorrects. L’application erronee du facteur de transformation de Lorentz, dont il a maintenant ete prouve de manie`re concluante qu’elle etait incorrecte, en tant qu’outil mathematique indispensable, s’est revelee ^etre l’outil crucial. Un examen critique des pretendues interconversions entre la masse et l’energie affirmees par le principe MEE prouve de manie`re concluante que l’apparition de telles interconversions ne pourrait avoir lieu qu’en violant les lois bien etablies de la nature—la loi de conservation de l’energie et la loi de conservation de la masse. Il a egalement ete demontre que cette theorie n’est pas conforme au principe de causalite. Une analyse approfondie du fondement conceptuel de E 5 mc² produitune multitude de consequences contradictoires et contradictoires et fournit une preuve convaincante que E 5 mc2 n’est pas la bonne equation. On conclut que l’equation MEE ne peut pas ^etre justifiee comme etant correcte par des raisonnements physiques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Physics Essays is the property of Physics Essays Publication and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 186938581
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Serious mistakes associated with Einstein’s E = mc² equation are brought to light.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ghoshala%2C+Suniti+K%2E%22">Ghoshala, Suniti K.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> sunitikghoshal@gmail.com</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Physics+Essays%22">Physics Essays</searchLink>. Jun2025, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p107-111. 5p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lorentz+transformations%22">Lorentz transformations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conservation+laws+%28Physics%29%22">Conservation laws (Physics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Special+relativity+%28Physics%29%22">Special relativity (Physics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematical+errors%22">Mathematical errors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Einstein%2C+Albert%2C+1879-1955%22">Einstein, Albert, 1879-1955</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Causality+%28Physics%29%22">Causality (Physics)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physicists%22">Physicists</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (English)
  Group: Ab
  Data: A thorough scrutiny of Einstein’s derivation of the mass–energy equivalence (MEE) equation reveals that the MEE equation derivation is based on conceptually as well as mathematically incorrect concepts. The mistaken application of the Lorentz transformation factor, which has now been conclusively proven to be incorrect, as an indispensable mathematical tool has been shown to be crucial. A critical review of the purported interconversions between mass and energy that the MEE principle asserts conclusively proves that the occurrence of such interconversions could take place only through violating the well-established laws of nature—the law of conservation of energy and the law of conservation of mass. The theory has also been shown to not be in conformity with the principle of causality. A thorough analysis of the conceptual foundation of E ¼ mc² yields a host of conflicting and self-contradictory consequences, providing convincing evidence that E ¼ mc² is not the correct equation. It is concluded that the MEE equation cannot be justified to be correct by any physical reasonings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (French)
  Group: Ab
  Data: Un examen approfondi de la derivation d’Einstein de l’equation d’equivalence masse- energie (MEE) reve`le que la derivation de l’equation MEE est basee sur des concepts conceptuellement et mathematiquement incorrects. L’application erronee du facteur de transformation de Lorentz, dont il a maintenant ete prouve de manie`re concluante qu’elle etait incorrecte, en tant qu’outil mathematique indispensable, s’est revelee ^etre l’outil crucial. Un examen critique des pretendues interconversions entre la masse et l’energie affirmees par le principe MEE prouve de manie`re concluante que l’apparition de telles interconversions ne pourrait avoir lieu qu’en violant les lois bien etablies de la nature—la loi de conservation de l’energie et la loi de conservation de la masse. Il a egalement ete demontre que cette theorie n’est pas conforme au principe de causalite. Une analyse approfondie du fondement conceptuel de E 5 mc² produitune multitude de consequences contradictoires et contradictoires et fournit une preuve convaincante que E 5 mc2 n’est pas la bonne equation. On conclut que l’equation MEE ne peut pas ^etre justifiee comme etant correcte par des raisonnements physiques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Physics Essays is the property of Physics Essays Publication and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=186938581
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.4006/0836-1398-38.2.107
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 5
        StartPage: 107
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Lorentz transformations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Conservation laws (Physics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Special relativity (Physics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematical errors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Einstein, Albert, 1879-1955
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Causality (Physics)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Physicists
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Serious mistakes associated with Einstein’s E = mc² equation are brought to light.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ghoshala, Suniti K.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2025
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 08361398
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 38
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Physics Essays
              Type: main
ResultId 1