View in EDS

How live-streaming commerce interacts with two-period pricing when selling to strategic customers.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: How live-streaming commerce interacts with two-period pricing when selling to strategic customers.
Authors: Chen, Pingping1,2 (AUTHOR) ppchen@sdu.edu.cn, Xie, Lei1,2 (AUTHOR) lxie@sdu.edu.cn, Dai, Lu1,2 (AUTHOR) 202313051@mail.sdu.edu.cn, Song, Zhuzhu1,3 (AUTHOR) songzz@cau.edu.cn
Source: European Journal of Operational Research. Nov2025, Vol. 327 Issue 1, p148-161. 14p.
Subjects: Time-based pricing, Profitability, Consumers' surplus, Electronic commerce, Consumers, Government policy
Abstract: Live-streaming commerce serves as a novel marketing tool in the digital era, facilitating real-time interactions between streamers and customers to enhance product sales. However, the transition back to solely traditional online channels following live-stream events presents decision-making challenges for firms regarding dynamic pricing, price commitment, and price matching schemes, particularly when dealing with strategic customers. We develop a two-period theoretical model to explore the selection of pricing schemes by a firm who may launch a live-streaming sales. Our analysis reveals that while live-streaming cannot necessarily enhance profitability under price commitment scheme, it significantly boosts profits under dynamic pricing and price matching schemes due to amplified pricing flexibility. The increased customer patience in strategic waiting diminishes the benefits of live-streaming under dynamic pricing, whereas it enhances them under price matching with reimbursement mechanisms. Moreover, dynamic pricing and price matching schemes, traditionally perceived as less favorable, emerge as potentially more effective due to the real-time value enhancement effect of live-streaming commerce, which can mitigate customers' strategic delay in purchasing decisions. The firm's selection of an optimal pricing scheme under live-streaming commerce can also maximize consumer surplus, thereby enhancing social welfare and promoting a positive image of corporate social responsibility advocated by governmental bodies. This "win-win-win" scenario for the firm, customers, and government can be achieved through dynamic pricing or price commitment schemes. In this context, a conducive social environment can be fostered, enabling all participants to collaborate in expanding opportunities and benefiting everyone. • Studying the link between live streaming and strategic customers. • Live streaming introduces pricing challenges for merchants. • Live streaming is not guaranteed to be profitable. • Dynamic pricing is profitable with live streaming mitigating strategic waiting. • Proper market environment and two-period pricing can benefit all participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Journal of Operational Research is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:Live-streaming commerce serves as a novel marketing tool in the digital era, facilitating real-time interactions between streamers and customers to enhance product sales. However, the transition back to solely traditional online channels following live-stream events presents decision-making challenges for firms regarding dynamic pricing, price commitment, and price matching schemes, particularly when dealing with strategic customers. We develop a two-period theoretical model to explore the selection of pricing schemes by a firm who may launch a live-streaming sales. Our analysis reveals that while live-streaming cannot necessarily enhance profitability under price commitment scheme, it significantly boosts profits under dynamic pricing and price matching schemes due to amplified pricing flexibility. The increased customer patience in strategic waiting diminishes the benefits of live-streaming under dynamic pricing, whereas it enhances them under price matching with reimbursement mechanisms. Moreover, dynamic pricing and price matching schemes, traditionally perceived as less favorable, emerge as potentially more effective due to the real-time value enhancement effect of live-streaming commerce, which can mitigate customers' strategic delay in purchasing decisions. The firm's selection of an optimal pricing scheme under live-streaming commerce can also maximize consumer surplus, thereby enhancing social welfare and promoting a positive image of corporate social responsibility advocated by governmental bodies. This "win-win-win" scenario for the firm, customers, and government can be achieved through dynamic pricing or price commitment schemes. In this context, a conducive social environment can be fostered, enabling all participants to collaborate in expanding opportunities and benefiting everyone. • Studying the link between live streaming and strategic customers. • Live streaming introduces pricing challenges for merchants. • Live streaming is not guaranteed to be profitable. • Dynamic pricing is profitable with live streaming mitigating strategic waiting. • Proper market environment and two-period pricing can benefit all participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:03772217
DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2025.05.042