Factors influencing educators' implementation of quality teaching practices in Australian engineering education.
Saved in:
| Title: | Factors influencing educators' implementation of quality teaching practices in Australian engineering education. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Dart, Sarah1 (AUTHOR) sarah.dart@qut.edu.au, Cunningham, Sam1 (AUTHOR), Gregg, Alexander2 (AUTHOR), Young, Amy1 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. May2025, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p18-36. 19p. |
| Subjects: | Engineering education, Effective teaching, Social capital, Educators, Bourdieu, Pierre, 1930-2002, Social theory, Thematic analysis |
| Abstract: | Improving teaching quality within engineering education is a long-standing challenge, made more difficult by the complex economic, political, and social environment in which educators operate. Understanding the enablers and barriers to implementing quality educational practices from a holistic perspective is thus critical for developing evidence-based actions for improving practice. This study addresses the research question: 'what key factors influence engineering educators' implementation of quality educational practices, and how?'. Using Bourdieu's Theory of Practice as the theoretical lens, interviews were conducted with 21 engineering educators from 11 distinct Australian universities. Conceptualising the field as the engineering departments of Australian universities, data were thematically analysed to identify key themes relating to capital (what is valued within the field) and habitus (characteristics influencing individuals' perceptions). Five factors emerged relating to capital: knowledge of engineering subject matter, knowledge of quality educational practices, recognition of teaching quality, resource allocation for teaching, and collegial network. These interacted with four factors relating to educators' habitus: role context, personal motivation towards teaching, subject and student characteristics, and institutional context. Recommendations for educational leaders include increasing the value of educational and industry acquired engineering knowledge, developing enhanced impact evaluation approaches aligned to recognition processes, and supporting engagement between educators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Australasian Journal of Engineering Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 187189420 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Factors influencing educators' implementation of quality teaching practices in Australian engineering education. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dart%2C+Sarah%22">Dart, Sarah</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> sarah.dart@qut.edu.au</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cunningham%2C+Sam%22">Cunningham, Sam</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gregg%2C+Alexander%22">Gregg, Alexander</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Young%2C+Amy%22">Young, Amy</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Australasian+Journal+of+Engineering+Education%22">Australasian Journal of Engineering Education</searchLink>. May2025, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p18-36. 19p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+education%22">Engineering education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Effective+teaching%22">Effective teaching</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+capital%22">Social capital</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educators%22">Educators</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bourdieu%2C+Pierre%2C+1930-2002%22">Bourdieu, Pierre, 1930-2002</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+theory%22">Social theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Improving teaching quality within engineering education is a long-standing challenge, made more difficult by the complex economic, political, and social environment in which educators operate. Understanding the enablers and barriers to implementing quality educational practices from a holistic perspective is thus critical for developing evidence-based actions for improving practice. This study addresses the research question: 'what key factors influence engineering educators' implementation of quality educational practices, and how?'. Using Bourdieu's Theory of Practice as the theoretical lens, interviews were conducted with 21 engineering educators from 11 distinct Australian universities. Conceptualising the field as the engineering departments of Australian universities, data were thematically analysed to identify key themes relating to capital (what is valued within the field) and habitus (characteristics influencing individuals' perceptions). Five factors emerged relating to capital: knowledge of engineering subject matter, knowledge of quality educational practices, recognition of teaching quality, resource allocation for teaching, and collegial network. These interacted with four factors relating to educators' habitus: role context, personal motivation towards teaching, subject and student characteristics, and institutional context. Recommendations for educational leaders include increasing the value of educational and industry acquired engineering knowledge, developing enhanced impact evaluation approaches aligned to recognition processes, and supporting engagement between educators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Australasian Journal of Engineering Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=187189420 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/22054952.2024.2407284 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 19 StartPage: 18 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Engineering education Type: general – SubjectFull: Effective teaching Type: general – SubjectFull: Social capital Type: general – SubjectFull: Educators Type: general – SubjectFull: Bourdieu, Pierre, 1930-2002 Type: general – SubjectFull: Social theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Factors influencing educators' implementation of quality teaching practices in Australian engineering education. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dart, Sarah – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cunningham, Sam – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gregg, Alexander – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Young, Amy IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: May2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 22054952 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 30 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Australasian Journal of Engineering Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |