Matrices of Different Natures for Bone Tissue Engineering—A Comparative Analysis.
Saved in:
| Title: | Matrices of Different Natures for Bone Tissue Engineering—A Comparative Analysis. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Aleinik, D. Ya.1 (AUTHOR), Bokov, A. E.1,2 (AUTHOR), Linkova, D. D.1,3 (AUTHOR), Levicheva, E. A.1 (AUTHOR), Farafontova, E. A.1,2 (AUTHOR), Kovylin, R. S.2,3 (AUTHOR), Yudin, V. V.1,2 (AUTHOR), Khramova, D. V.2 (AUTHOR), Cherdantseva, L. A.3 (AUTHOR), Chesnokov, S. A.1,2 (AUTHOR), Kirilova, I. A.3 (AUTHOR), Egorikhina, M. N.1 (AUTHOR) egorihina.marfa@yandex.ru |
| Source: | Materials (1996-1944). Sep2025, Vol. 18 Issue 18, p4244. 20p. |
| Subjects: | Tissue engineering, Cytocompatibility, Porosity, Traumatic bone defects, Bioactive compounds, Mechanical behavior of materials, Tissue scaffolds |
| Abstract: | Recent decades have been characterized by increasing numbers of bone tissue injuries and diseases resulting in the formation of bone defects. The number of such bone defects has also grown due to active surgical approaches implemented after surgical interventions for oncological, infectious, and dystrophic bone lesions. To repair such bone defects requires the use of bone tissue substitutes. Nowadays, constructs based on matrices of various compositions and structures, supplemented with the addition of biologically active components (including growth factors and cells), are the most promising approaches used in bone tissue engineering. The properties of the matrices are of the utmost importance in construct formation. This work presents the results of a comprehensive study of matrices of various natures intended for the formation of complex constructs for bone tissue engineering. Using a set of methods for studying the physical, mechanical, and biological characteristics, the total and associated porosity of the studied matrices, the structure, the mechanical parameters, and the level of cytotoxicity and cytocompatibility were determined. It was shown that all the studied materials were not cytotoxic (cytotoxicity rank of all matrices = 0–1). All matrices were porous, but samples of materials of biological origin had large pores ranging in size from 100 to 1000 μm, and pores of the hybrid polymer were sized from 0.1 to 100 μm. Total and open porosity ranged from 89% and 79% for the allogeneic matrix up to 67% and 48% for the hybrid polymer, respectively, while the σ values (compressive stress at break) of samples of all studied materials were close to each other. When human test culture MSCs interact with samples of these materials, it was shown that the cells adhere to the surface and structure of all materials and retain typical morphology, while also demonstrating the ability to proliferate and migrate along the surface and into the matrix structure, i.e., all materials are cytocompatible. Based on the data obtained, it can be assumed that all the studied matrices can be used for model biomedical studies and as a basis for constructs for bone tissue engineering. An adequate choice of research method at the earliest stages of the development of each material will ensure the most effective approaches for further work and subsequent use of this product. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Materials (1996-1944) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 188281796 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Matrices of Different Natures for Bone Tissue Engineering—A Comparative Analysis. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Aleinik%2C+D%2E+Ya%2E%22">Aleinik, D. Ya.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bokov%2C+A%2E+E%2E%22">Bokov, A. E.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Linkova%2C+D%2E+D%2E%22">Linkova, D. D.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Levicheva%2C+E%2E+A%2E%22">Levicheva, E. A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Farafontova%2C+E%2E+A%2E%22">Farafontova, E. A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kovylin%2C+R%2E+S%2E%22">Kovylin, R. S.</searchLink><relatesTo>2,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yudin%2C+V%2E+V%2E%22">Yudin, V. V.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Khramova%2C+D%2E+V%2E%22">Khramova, D. V.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cherdantseva%2C+L%2E+A%2E%22">Cherdantseva, L. A.</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chesnokov%2C+S%2E+A%2E%22">Chesnokov, S. A.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kirilova%2C+I%2E+A%2E%22">Kirilova, I. A.</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Egorikhina%2C+M%2E+N%2E%22">Egorikhina, M. N.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> egorihina.marfa@yandex.ru</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Materials+%281996-1944%29%22">Materials (1996-1944)</searchLink>. Sep2025, Vol. 18 Issue 18, p4244. 20p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tissue+engineering%22">Tissue engineering</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cytocompatibility%22">Cytocompatibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Porosity%22">Porosity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Traumatic+bone+defects%22">Traumatic bone defects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bioactive+compounds%22">Bioactive compounds</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mechanical+behavior+of+materials%22">Mechanical behavior of materials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tissue+scaffolds%22">Tissue scaffolds</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Recent decades have been characterized by increasing numbers of bone tissue injuries and diseases resulting in the formation of bone defects. The number of such bone defects has also grown due to active surgical approaches implemented after surgical interventions for oncological, infectious, and dystrophic bone lesions. To repair such bone defects requires the use of bone tissue substitutes. Nowadays, constructs based on matrices of various compositions and structures, supplemented with the addition of biologically active components (including growth factors and cells), are the most promising approaches used in bone tissue engineering. The properties of the matrices are of the utmost importance in construct formation. This work presents the results of a comprehensive study of matrices of various natures intended for the formation of complex constructs for bone tissue engineering. Using a set of methods for studying the physical, mechanical, and biological characteristics, the total and associated porosity of the studied matrices, the structure, the mechanical parameters, and the level of cytotoxicity and cytocompatibility were determined. It was shown that all the studied materials were not cytotoxic (cytotoxicity rank of all matrices = 0–1). All matrices were porous, but samples of materials of biological origin had large pores ranging in size from 100 to 1000 μm, and pores of the hybrid polymer were sized from 0.1 to 100 μm. Total and open porosity ranged from 89% and 79% for the allogeneic matrix up to 67% and 48% for the hybrid polymer, respectively, while the σ values (compressive stress at break) of samples of all studied materials were close to each other. When human test culture MSCs interact with samples of these materials, it was shown that the cells adhere to the surface and structure of all materials and retain typical morphology, while also demonstrating the ability to proliferate and migrate along the surface and into the matrix structure, i.e., all materials are cytocompatible. Based on the data obtained, it can be assumed that all the studied matrices can be used for model biomedical studies and as a basis for constructs for bone tissue engineering. An adequate choice of research method at the earliest stages of the development of each material will ensure the most effective approaches for further work and subsequent use of this product. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Materials (1996-1944) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=188281796 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.3390/ma18184244 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 20 StartPage: 4244 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Tissue engineering Type: general – SubjectFull: Cytocompatibility Type: general – SubjectFull: Porosity Type: general – SubjectFull: Traumatic bone defects Type: general – SubjectFull: Bioactive compounds Type: general – SubjectFull: Mechanical behavior of materials Type: general – SubjectFull: Tissue scaffolds Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Matrices of Different Natures for Bone Tissue Engineering—A Comparative Analysis. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Aleinik, D. Ya. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Bokov, A. E. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Linkova, D. D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Levicheva, E. A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Farafontova, E. A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kovylin, R. S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yudin, V. V. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Khramova, D. V. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cherdantseva, L. A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chesnokov, S. A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kirilova, I. A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Egorikhina, M. N. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 15 M: 09 Text: Sep2025 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 19961944 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 18 – Type: issue Value: 18 Titles: – TitleFull: Materials (1996-1944) Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |