Methods of Evaluating the Depth and Dimensionality of Geological Structures Based on Geophysical Parameters Measured at the Land Surface.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Methods of Evaluating the Depth and Dimensionality of Geological Structures Based on Geophysical Parameters Measured at the Land Surface.
Authors:	Asimopolos, Laurențiu¹ (AUTHOR) asimopolos@gmail.com, Asimopolos, Natalia-Silvia¹ (AUTHOR) asi_nata@yahoo.com, Asimopolos, Adrian-Aristide² (AUTHOR) adrian.asimopolos@gmail.com
Source:	Mining Revue / Revista Minelor. Sep2025, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p104-111. 8p.
Subjects:	Moving average process, Hypersurfaces, Longitude, Latitude, Polynomials
Abstract:	The depth and size of the geological structures, affected by tectonic elements (faults, fractures, cracks), can be determined by various methods. In the paper we present applications of moving averaging with variable window, polynomial trend surfaces and hypersurfaces, the variation of the generalized Pearson coefficient as well as their combinations for the 2D and 3D cases. The geophysical parameters measured at the ground surface are transposed into a rectangular grid, using interpolation formulas and software programs. The values in the grid nodes, together with latitude and longitude, represent the input data for the programs performed by authors and presented in the paper. If we also have data of geophysical parameters measured at different depths, we can also introduce the depth into the input data. Thus, we will have three independent parameters and a dependent geophysical parameter. By running specific programs we obtain the equations of trend surfaces or hypersurfaces, for different degrees, chosen according to the depth of the geological sources investigated. Thus, we obtain 2D, residual and trend maps for different degrees of the polynomials that are equivalent to different investigation depths. Similarly for 3D space, if we have geophysical data measured in depth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Mining Revue / Revista Minelor is the property of Paradigm Publishing Services and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Engineering Source

Description
Abstract:	The depth and size of the geological structures, affected by tectonic elements (faults, fractures, cracks), can be determined by various methods. In the paper we present applications of moving averaging with variable window, polynomial trend surfaces and hypersurfaces, the variation of the generalized Pearson coefficient as well as their combinations for the 2D and 3D cases. The geophysical parameters measured at the ground surface are transposed into a rectangular grid, using interpolation formulas and software programs. The values in the grid nodes, together with latitude and longitude, represent the input data for the programs performed by authors and presented in the paper. If we also have data of geophysical parameters measured at different depths, we can also introduce the depth into the input data. Thus, we will have three independent parameters and a dependent geophysical parameter. By running specific programs we obtain the equations of trend surfaces or hypersurfaces, for different degrees, chosen according to the depth of the geological sources investigated. Thus, we obtain 2D, residual and trend maps for different degrees of the polynomials that are equivalent to different investigation depths. Similarly for 3D space, if we have geophysical data measured in depth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	12202053
DOI:	10.2478/minrv-2025-0033