Who wrote Shamela? Verifying the Authorship of a Parodic Text.
Saved in:
| Title: | Who wrote Shamela? Verifying the Authorship of a Parodic Text. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Burrows, John1 john.burrows@netcentral.com.au |
| Source: | Literary & Linguistic Computing. Nov2005, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p437-450. 14p. 5 Charts, 2 Graphs. |
| Subjects: | Authorship, Imitation in literature, Attribution of authorship, Shamela (Book), Parody, Literature |
| Abstract: | Imitative texts of high quality are of some importance to students of attribution, especially those who use computational methods. The authorship of such texts is always likely to be difficult to demonstrate. In some cases, the identity of the author is a question of interest to literary scholars. Even when that is not so, students of attribution face a challenge. If we cannot distinguish between original and imitation in such cases, we must always concede that an imitator may have been at work. Shamela (1741) has always been regarded as a brilliant parody. When it is subjected to our standard common-words tests of authorship, it yields mixed results. A new procedure, in which special word-lists are established according to a predetermined set of rules, proves more effective. It needs, however, to be tried in other cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Literary & Linguistic Computing is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 18858352 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Who wrote Shamela? Verifying the Authorship of a Parodic Text. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burrows%2C+John%22">Burrows, John</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> john.burrows@netcentral.com.au</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Literary+%26+Linguistic+Computing%22">Literary & Linguistic Computing</searchLink>. Nov2005, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p437-450. 14p. 5 Charts, 2 Graphs. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Authorship%22">Authorship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Imitation+in+literature%22">Imitation in literature</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attribution+of+authorship%22">Attribution of authorship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Shamela+%28Book%29%22">Shamela (Book)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Parody%22">Parody</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Literature%22">Literature</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Imitative texts of high quality are of some importance to students of attribution, especially those who use computational methods. The authorship of such texts is always likely to be difficult to demonstrate. In some cases, the identity of the author is a question of interest to literary scholars. Even when that is not so, students of attribution face a challenge. If we cannot distinguish between original and imitation in such cases, we must always concede that an imitator may have been at work. Shamela (1741) has always been regarded as a brilliant parody. When it is subjected to our standard common-words tests of authorship, it yields mixed results. A new procedure, in which special word-lists are established according to a predetermined set of rules, proves more effective. It needs, however, to be tried in other cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Literary & Linguistic Computing is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=18858352 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1093/llc/fqi049 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 14 StartPage: 437 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Authorship Type: general – SubjectFull: Imitation in literature Type: general – SubjectFull: Attribution of authorship Type: general – SubjectFull: Shamela (Book) Type: general – SubjectFull: Parody Type: general – SubjectFull: Literature Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Who wrote Shamela? Verifying the Authorship of a Parodic Text. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burrows, John IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 11 Text: Nov2005 Type: published Y: 2005 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 02681145 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 20 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Literary & Linguistic Computing Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
