Advancing Spatial Planning for Wildfire-Resilient Settlements: Insights From Chile and Victoria (Australia).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Advancing Spatial Planning for Wildfire-Resilient Settlements: Insights From Chile and Victoria (Australia).
Authors: Gonzalez-Mathiesen, Constanza1 (AUTHOR) mariagonzalez@udd.cl
Source: Journal of the American Planning Association. 2026, Vol. 92 Issue 1, p1-14. 14p.
Subjects: Wildfire risk, Disaster resilience, Environmental protection planning, Rural-urban relations, Strategic planning, Emergency management
Geographic Terms: Australia, Victoria, Chile
Abstract: Problem, research strategy, and findings: Wildfires imply greater disaster risk at the urban–rural interface of wildfire-prone areas. Spatial planning systems are now commonly expected to consider wildfire risk management and promote wildfire resilience. However, there is a lack of practical and nuanced understandings about the ways spatial planning instruments can comprehensively integrate wildfire risk management. To address this knowledge gap, I propose a framework for the comprehensive integration of wildfire disaster risk reduction into spatial planning instruments, considering the barriers and facilitators that influence the ability of planning instruments to promote settlements' resilience to wildfire. This research comprises inductive qualitative research of two case studies (the Chilean and Victorian [Australia] planning systems). I used content analysis of documents, interviews, and cross-case comparisons and synthesis to explore and develop analytic generalizations about spatial planning instruments' role, abilities, and limitations in wildfire risk management. I propose a framework for the comprehensive integration of wildfire risk management into spatial planning instruments that distinguishes components, roles, and factors for promoting settlements' resilience to wildfires organized according to three levels of spatial planning instruments: strategic, tactical, and operational. Takeaway for practice: Applied understandings about spatial planning instruments' ways of dealing with wildfires, such as the one suggested here, provide directions for improving spatial planning systems and can serve as a critical appraisal tool of existing instruments across different contexts. Furthermore, they are essential for translating resilience from a descriptive ideal into useful spatial planning practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of the American Planning Association is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 190282701
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Advancing Spatial Planning for Wildfire-Resilient Settlements: Insights From Chile and Victoria (Australia).
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gonzalez-Mathiesen%2C+Constanza%22">Gonzalez-Mathiesen, Constanza</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> mariagonzalez@udd.cl</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+the+American+Planning+Association%22">Journal of the American Planning Association</searchLink>. 2026, Vol. 92 Issue 1, p1-14. 14p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Wildfire+risk%22">Wildfire risk</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Disaster+resilience%22">Disaster resilience</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Environmental+protection+planning%22">Environmental protection planning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rural-urban+relations%22">Rural-urban relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Strategic+planning%22">Strategic planning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Emergency+management%22">Emergency management</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Victoria%22">Victoria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Chile%22">Chile</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Problem, research strategy, and findings: Wildfires imply greater disaster risk at the urban–rural interface of wildfire-prone areas. Spatial planning systems are now commonly expected to consider wildfire risk management and promote wildfire resilience. However, there is a lack of practical and nuanced understandings about the ways spatial planning instruments can comprehensively integrate wildfire risk management. To address this knowledge gap, I propose a framework for the comprehensive integration of wildfire disaster risk reduction into spatial planning instruments, considering the barriers and facilitators that influence the ability of planning instruments to promote settlements' resilience to wildfire. This research comprises inductive qualitative research of two case studies (the Chilean and Victorian [Australia] planning systems). I used content analysis of documents, interviews, and cross-case comparisons and synthesis to explore and develop analytic generalizations about spatial planning instruments' role, abilities, and limitations in wildfire risk management. I propose a framework for the comprehensive integration of wildfire risk management into spatial planning instruments that distinguishes components, roles, and factors for promoting settlements' resilience to wildfires organized according to three levels of spatial planning instruments: strategic, tactical, and operational. Takeaway for practice: Applied understandings about spatial planning instruments' ways of dealing with wildfires, such as the one suggested here, provide directions for improving spatial planning systems and can serve as a critical appraisal tool of existing instruments across different contexts. Furthermore, they are essential for translating resilience from a descriptive ideal into useful spatial planning practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of the American Planning Association is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=190282701
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/01944363.2025.2527117
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Wildfire risk
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Disaster resilience
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Environmental protection planning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Rural-urban relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Strategic planning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Emergency management
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Australia
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Victoria
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Chile
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Advancing Spatial Planning for Wildfire-Resilient Settlements: Insights From Chile and Victoria (Australia).
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gonzalez-Mathiesen, Constanza
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: 2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 01944363
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 92
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of the American Planning Association
              Type: main
ResultId 1