View in EDS

Innovative biosensing approaches for early detection of marine fish diseases.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Innovative biosensing approaches for early detection of marine fish diseases.
Authors: Ringgit, Gilbert1 (AUTHOR) gilbertringgit@gmail.com, Siddiquee, Shafiquzzaman1 (AUTHOR) shafiqpab@ums.edu.my, Yanuhar, Uun2 (AUTHOR) doktoruun@ub.ac.id, Amrillah, Attabik Mukhammad2 (AUTHOR) attabikma@ub.ac.id, Lal, Mohammad Tamrin Mohamad1,3 (AUTHOR) mdtamrin@ums.edu.my
Source: Microchemical Journal. Jan2026, Vol. 220, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subjects: Biosensors, Fish diseases, Biochips, Aptamers, Diagnosis, Nanoparticles, Sensitivity & specificity (Statistics), Nanocomposite materials
Abstract: Biosensor techniques are advanced and powerful methods for detecting marine fish pathogens. These techniques offer several advantages, such as low cost, on-site detection, and high sensitivity, selectivity, and specificity. Due to these benefits, many researchers today prefer biosensor methods over conventional approaches. We are interested in reviewing biosensors for monitoring marine fish pathogens due to the limited amount of information available. Additionally, the current information is poorly organized. The performance of sensors depends on the nanoparticles, nanocomposites, aptamers, and microchips to achieve a low limit of detection (LOD). Additionally, we discuss the innovative biosensor for marine fish diseases, focusing on the principle, mechanism, and design. This review provides comprehensive information on the application of biosensor techniques for the detection of specific pathogen species. It aims to offer valuable insights to researchers and readers interested in developing biosensors for identifying various pathogen species in infected fish. [Display omitted] • Marine fish diseases detected using nanoparticles, nanocomposites, aptamers, and microchips. • Biosensing techniques are low cost, on-site detection, and high sensitivity, selectivity, and specificity. • Limit of detection depends on nanoparticle size, electrostatic interactions, steric hindrance, and π–π stacking interactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Microchemical Journal is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:Biosensor techniques are advanced and powerful methods for detecting marine fish pathogens. These techniques offer several advantages, such as low cost, on-site detection, and high sensitivity, selectivity, and specificity. Due to these benefits, many researchers today prefer biosensor methods over conventional approaches. We are interested in reviewing biosensors for monitoring marine fish pathogens due to the limited amount of information available. Additionally, the current information is poorly organized. The performance of sensors depends on the nanoparticles, nanocomposites, aptamers, and microchips to achieve a low limit of detection (LOD). Additionally, we discuss the innovative biosensor for marine fish diseases, focusing on the principle, mechanism, and design. This review provides comprehensive information on the application of biosensor techniques for the detection of specific pathogen species. It aims to offer valuable insights to researchers and readers interested in developing biosensors for identifying various pathogen species in infected fish. [Display omitted] • Marine fish diseases detected using nanoparticles, nanocomposites, aptamers, and microchips. • Biosensing techniques are low cost, on-site detection, and high sensitivity, selectivity, and specificity. • Limit of detection depends on nanoparticle size, electrostatic interactions, steric hindrance, and π–π stacking interactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:0026265X
DOI:10.1016/j.microc.2025.116388