Enhancing cardiac MRI reliability at 3 T using motion‐adaptive B0 shimming.
Saved in:
| Title: | Enhancing cardiac MRI reliability at 3 T using motion‐adaptive B |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Huang, Yuheng1,2,3 (AUTHOR), Malagi, Archana Vadiraj1 (AUTHOR), Li, Xinqi1 (AUTHOR), Guan, Xingmin2 (AUTHOR), Yang, Chia‐Chi1 (AUTHOR), Huang, Li‐Ting1 (AUTHOR), Long, Ziyang1,3,4 (AUTHOR), Zepeda, Jeremy1 (AUTHOR), Zhang, Xinheng1 (AUTHOR), Yoosefian, Ghazal2 (AUTHOR), Bi, Xioaming5 (AUTHOR), Gao, Chang5 (AUTHOR), Shang, Yun4 (AUTHOR), Binesh, Nader6 (AUTHOR), Lee, Hsu‐Lei1 (AUTHOR), Li, Debiao1,3 (AUTHOR), Dharmakumar, Rohan2 (AUTHOR), Han, Hui4 (AUTHOR), Yang, Hsin‐Jung R.1 (AUTHOR) hsin-jung.yang@cshs.org |
| Source: | Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Jan2026, Vol. 95 Issue 1, p112-124. 13p. |
| Subjects: | Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, Magnetic resonance imaging, Magnetic flux density, Magnetic susceptibility, Deep learning |
| Abstract: | Purpose: Magnetic susceptibility differences at the heart–lung interface introduce B0‐field inhomogeneities that challenge cardiac MRI at high field strengths (≥ 3 T). Although hardware‐based shimming has advanced, conventional approaches often neglect dynamic variations in thoracic anatomy caused by cardiac and respiratory motion, leading to residual off‐resonance artifacts. This study aims to characterize motion‐induced B0‐field fluctuations in the heart and evaluate a deep learning–enabled motion‐adaptive B0 shimming pipeline to mitigate them. Methods: A motion‐resolved B0 mapping sequence was implemented at 3 T to quantify cardiac and respiratory‐induced B0 variations. A motion‐adaptive shimming framework was then developed and validated through numerical simulations and human imaging studies. B0‐field homogeneity and T2* mapping accuracy were assessed in multiple breath‐hold positions using standard and motion‐adaptive shimming. Results: Respiratory motion significantly altered myocardial B0 fields (p < 0.01), whereas cardiac motion had minimal impact (p = 0.49). Compared with conventional scanner shimming, motion‐adaptive B0 shimming yielded significantly improved field uniformity across both inspiratory (post‐shim SDratio: 0.68 ± 0.10 vs. 0.89 ± 0.11; p < 0.05) and expiratory (0.65 ± 0.16 vs. 0.84 ± 0.20; p < 0.05) breath‐hold states. Corresponding improvements in myocardial T2* map homogeneity were observed, with reduced coefficient of variation (0.44 ± 0.19 vs. 0.39 ± 0.22; 0.59 ± 0.30 vs. 0.46 ± 0.21; both p < 0.01). Conclusion: The proposed motion‐adaptive B0 shimming approach effectively compensates for respiration‐induced B0 fluctuations, enhancing field homogeneity and reducing off‐resonance artifacts. This strategy improves the robustness and reproducibility of T2* mapping, enabling more reliable high‐field cardiac MRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 190791877 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Enhancing cardiac MRI reliability at 3 T using motion‐adaptive B<subscript>0</subscript> shimming. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Huang%2C+Yuheng%22">Huang, Yuheng</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Malagi%2C+Archana+Vadiraj%22">Malagi, Archana Vadiraj</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Li%2C+Xinqi%22">Li, Xinqi</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Guan%2C+Xingmin%22">Guan, Xingmin</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yang%2C+Chia‐Chi%22">Yang, Chia‐Chi</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Huang%2C+Li‐Ting%22">Huang, Li‐Ting</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Long%2C+Ziyang%22">Long, Ziyang</searchLink><relatesTo>1,3,4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zepeda%2C+Jeremy%22">Zepeda, Jeremy</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhang%2C+Xinheng%22">Zhang, Xinheng</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yoosefian%2C+Ghazal%22">Yoosefian, Ghazal</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bi%2C+Xioaming%22">Bi, Xioaming</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gao%2C+Chang%22">Gao, Chang</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shang%2C+Yun%22">Shang, Yun</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Binesh%2C+Nader%22">Binesh, Nader</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lee%2C+Hsu‐Lei%22">Lee, Hsu‐Lei</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Li%2C+Debiao%22">Li, Debiao</searchLink><relatesTo>1,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dharmakumar%2C+Rohan%22">Dharmakumar, Rohan</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Han%2C+Hui%22">Han, Hui</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yang%2C+Hsin‐Jung+R%2E%22">Yang, Hsin‐Jung R.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> hsin-jung.yang@cshs.org</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Magnetic+Resonance+in+Medicine%22">Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</searchLink>. Jan2026, Vol. 95 Issue 1, p112-124. 13p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cardiac+magnetic+resonance+imaging%22">Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Magnetic+resonance+imaging%22">Magnetic resonance imaging</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Magnetic+flux+density%22">Magnetic flux density</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Magnetic+susceptibility%22">Magnetic susceptibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Deep+learning%22">Deep learning</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Purpose: Magnetic susceptibility differences at the heart–lung interface introduce B0‐field inhomogeneities that challenge cardiac MRI at high field strengths (≥ 3 T). Although hardware‐based shimming has advanced, conventional approaches often neglect dynamic variations in thoracic anatomy caused by cardiac and respiratory motion, leading to residual off‐resonance artifacts. This study aims to characterize motion‐induced B0‐field fluctuations in the heart and evaluate a deep learning–enabled motion‐adaptive B0 shimming pipeline to mitigate them. Methods: A motion‐resolved B0 mapping sequence was implemented at 3 T to quantify cardiac and respiratory‐induced B0 variations. A motion‐adaptive shimming framework was then developed and validated through numerical simulations and human imaging studies. B0‐field homogeneity and T2* mapping accuracy were assessed in multiple breath‐hold positions using standard and motion‐adaptive shimming. Results: Respiratory motion significantly altered myocardial B0 fields (p < 0.01), whereas cardiac motion had minimal impact (p = 0.49). Compared with conventional scanner shimming, motion‐adaptive B0 shimming yielded significantly improved field uniformity across both inspiratory (post‐shim SDratio: 0.68 ± 0.10 vs. 0.89 ± 0.11; p < 0.05) and expiratory (0.65 ± 0.16 vs. 0.84 ± 0.20; p < 0.05) breath‐hold states. Corresponding improvements in myocardial T2* map homogeneity were observed, with reduced coefficient of variation (0.44 ± 0.19 vs. 0.39 ± 0.22; 0.59 ± 0.30 vs. 0.46 ± 0.21; both p < 0.01). Conclusion: The proposed motion‐adaptive B0 shimming approach effectively compensates for respiration‐induced B0 fluctuations, enhancing field homogeneity and reducing off‐resonance artifacts. This strategy improves the robustness and reproducibility of T2* mapping, enabling more reliable high‐field cardiac MRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=190791877 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/mrm.70026 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 112 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging Type: general – SubjectFull: Magnetic resonance imaging Type: general – SubjectFull: Magnetic flux density Type: general – SubjectFull: Magnetic susceptibility Type: general – SubjectFull: Deep learning Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Enhancing cardiac MRI reliability at 3 T using motion‐adaptive B0 shimming. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Huang, Yuheng – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Malagi, Archana Vadiraj – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Li, Xinqi – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Guan, Xingmin – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yang, Chia‐Chi – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Huang, Li‐Ting – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Long, Ziyang – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zepeda, Jeremy – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zhang, Xinheng – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yoosefian, Ghazal – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Bi, Xioaming – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gao, Chang – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Shang, Yun – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Binesh, Nader – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lee, Hsu‐Lei – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Li, Debiao – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dharmakumar, Rohan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Han, Hui – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yang, Hsin‐Jung R. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Text: Jan2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 07403194 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 95 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |