Supporting fair use in context of instruments in engineering education research: A renewed conversation about validity.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Supporting fair use in context of instruments in engineering education research: A renewed conversation about validity.
Authors: Henderson, Trevion S.1 (AUTHOR) trevion.henderson@tufts.edu, Godwin, Allison2 (AUTHOR) afg64@cornell.edu, Carberry, Adam Robert3 (AUTHOR) carberry.22@osu.edu
Source: Journal of Engineering Education. Jan2026, Vol. 115 Issue 1, p1-5. 5p.
Subjects: Test validity, Engineering education, Statistical reliability, Research methodology, Evaluation methodology, Research integrity
Abstract: The article focuses on the importance of validity in engineering education research, highlighting the need for a robust validation process for assessment instruments. It discusses the historical reliance on external frameworks for instrument development and the ongoing issues with the inadequate consideration of validity in many submissions to the Journal of Engineering Education. The authors emphasize a shift from a trinitarian to a unitarian view of validity, advocating for a comprehensive approach that includes methodological transparency, context-specific considerations, and valid inferences. They encourage the engineering education community to engage with these discussions to enhance the quality and trustworthiness of research findings. [Extracted from the article]
Copyright of Journal of Engineering Education is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 191181647
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Supporting fair use in context of instruments in engineering education research: A renewed conversation about validity.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Henderson%2C+Trevion+S%2E%22">Henderson, Trevion S.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> trevion.henderson@tufts.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Godwin%2C+Allison%22">Godwin, Allison</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> afg64@cornell.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Carberry%2C+Adam+Robert%22">Carberry, Adam Robert</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> carberry.22@osu.edu</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Engineering+Education%22">Journal of Engineering Education</searchLink>. Jan2026, Vol. 115 Issue 1, p1-5. 5p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+validity%22">Test validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+education%22">Engineering education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+reliability%22">Statistical reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+methodology%22">Evaluation methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+integrity%22">Research integrity</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The article focuses on the importance of validity in engineering education research, highlighting the need for a robust validation process for assessment instruments. It discusses the historical reliance on external frameworks for instrument development and the ongoing issues with the inadequate consideration of validity in many submissions to the Journal of Engineering Education. The authors emphasize a shift from a trinitarian to a unitarian view of validity, advocating for a comprehensive approach that includes methodological transparency, context-specific considerations, and valid inferences. They encourage the engineering education community to engage with these discussions to enhance the quality and trustworthiness of research findings. [Extracted from the article]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Engineering Education is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=191181647
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/jee.70041
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 5
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Test validity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Engineering education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical reliability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research integrity
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Supporting fair use in context of instruments in engineering education research: A renewed conversation about validity.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Henderson, Trevion S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Godwin, Allison
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Carberry, Adam Robert
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10694730
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 115
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Engineering Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1