Scenario based comparison of alternative fuel production systems for a virtual average German farm.
Saved in:
| Title: | Scenario based comparison of alternative fuel production systems for a virtual average German farm. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | von Rüden, Lea1 (AUTHOR) lea.vonrueden@dlr.de, Satola, Barbara1 (AUTHOR), Kröner, Michael1 (AUTHOR), Vehse, Martin1 (AUTHOR), Dyck, Alexander1 (AUTHOR), Agert, Carsten1 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Energy. Mar2026, Vol. 346, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p. |
| Subjects: | Rapeseed oil, Hydrogen as fuel, Biogas, Renewable energy sources, Cost effectiveness, Land use, Alternative fuels, Agriculture |
| Abstract: | The German agricultural sector consumes approx. 2 billion litres of diesel annually. While sustainable fuels remain underutilised, shifting from diesel to low-emission options is crucial for achieving a climate-neutral agricultural sector as mandated by the German Federal Climate Change Act. This study therefore examines three on-farm renewable fuel production pathways - biogas from manure and rapeseed oil, as well as hydrogen - on an average German farm. The results show that hydrogen offers the most land-efficient solution, requiring less than 1 % land use of the other alternatives, whereas rapeseed oil proves the most cost-effective option, with periodical costs 26 % lower than for biomethane and 18 % lower than for hydrogen, respectively. • German farms can produce rape oil, biomethane or hydrogen to meet their fuel demand. • Rapeseed oil is the most economical alternative fuel. • The German rapeseed production cannot meet the agricultural fuel demand. • Biomethane production from German Dairy manure could meet agricultural fuel demand. • Hydrogen production is the best option concerning land use efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Energy is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 191663763 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Scenario based comparison of alternative fuel production systems for a virtual average German farm. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22von+Rüden%2C+Lea%22">von Rüden, Lea</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> lea.vonrueden@dlr.de</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Satola%2C+Barbara%22">Satola, Barbara</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kröner%2C+Michael%22">Kröner, Michael</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vehse%2C+Martin%22">Vehse, Martin</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dyck%2C+Alexander%22">Dyck, Alexander</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Agert%2C+Carsten%22">Agert, Carsten</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Energy%22">Energy</searchLink>. Mar2026, Vol. 346, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rapeseed+oil%22">Rapeseed oil</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hydrogen+as+fuel%22">Hydrogen as fuel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biogas%22">Biogas</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Renewable+energy+sources%22">Renewable energy sources</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cost+effectiveness%22">Cost effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Land+use%22">Land use</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Alternative+fuels%22">Alternative fuels</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Agriculture%22">Agriculture</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The German agricultural sector consumes approx. 2 billion litres of diesel annually. While sustainable fuels remain underutilised, shifting from diesel to low-emission options is crucial for achieving a climate-neutral agricultural sector as mandated by the German Federal Climate Change Act. This study therefore examines three on-farm renewable fuel production pathways - biogas from manure and rapeseed oil, as well as hydrogen - on an average German farm. The results show that hydrogen offers the most land-efficient solution, requiring less than 1 % land use of the other alternatives, whereas rapeseed oil proves the most cost-effective option, with periodical costs 26 % lower than for biomethane and 18 % lower than for hydrogen, respectively. • German farms can produce rape oil, biomethane or hydrogen to meet their fuel demand. • Rapeseed oil is the most economical alternative fuel. • The German rapeseed production cannot meet the agricultural fuel demand. • Biomethane production from German Dairy manure could meet agricultural fuel demand. • Hydrogen production is the best option concerning land use efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Energy is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=191663763 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140239 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 1 StartPage: N.PAG Subjects: – SubjectFull: Rapeseed oil Type: general – SubjectFull: Hydrogen as fuel Type: general – SubjectFull: Biogas Type: general – SubjectFull: Renewable energy sources Type: general – SubjectFull: Cost effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Land use Type: general – SubjectFull: Alternative fuels Type: general – SubjectFull: Agriculture Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Scenario based comparison of alternative fuel production systems for a virtual average German farm. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: von Rüden, Lea – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Satola, Barbara – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kröner, Michael – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Vehse, Martin – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dyck, Alexander – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Agert, Carsten IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Mar2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 03605442 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 346 Titles: – TitleFull: Energy Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |