Monetary rewards or comment recognition? The difference between the two types of feedback in online Q&A community.
Saved in:
| Title: | Monetary rewards or comment recognition? The difference between the two types of feedback in online Q&A community. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Liu, Jinpeng1 (AUTHOR) JinpengLiu@stu.sufe.edu.cn, Li, Xinmiao1 (AUTHOR) xinmiaoli@126.com, Liu, Xipeng1 (AUTHOR) axi853@163.com |
| Source: | Information Technology & People. 2026, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p906-933. 28p. |
| Subjects: | Reward (Psychology), Question & answer websites, Social status, Motivation (Psychology), Incentive (Psychology), Self-determination theory, Information sharing |
| Abstract: | Purpose: An in-depth exploration of difference in the motivational effects of various types of feedback can better address the challenges faced by knowledge contributions. Drawing upon the self-determination theory (SDT), this study examines the relative effects of asker monetary rewards and peer comment recognition in the short term, the heterogeneous effects across different social status levels and their long-term impact over time. Design/methodology/approach: Based on panel data from an online financial knowledge Q&A community, this study employs a fixed-effects Poisson regression for empirical analysis. In addition, it also conducts instrumental variable regression and a series of robustness tests. Findings: The results indicate the following: (1) Peer comment recognition has a positive effect on knowledge contributions, whereas asker monetary rewards have a negative impact. (2) In the short-term, the relative effect of asker monetary rewards is stronger, but this effect changes as the social status of the user increases. (3) There is no evidence of an offsetting effect between asker monetary rewards and peer comment recognition. (4) The impact of both asker monetary rewards and peer comment recognition on continuous knowledge contributions decreases over time, but the influence of the latter lasts longer. Originality/value: Previous studies on monetary rewards and peer recognition have focused primarily on their direct effects. This research explores the differences in external incentives by examining the sources, types and timing of feedback, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms that drive continuous knowledge contribution. It also offers a more valuable insights for the management of knowledge Q&A communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Information Technology & People is the property of Emerald Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 192012965 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Monetary rewards or comment recognition? The difference between the two types of feedback in online Q&A community. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Liu%2C+Jinpeng%22">Liu, Jinpeng</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> JinpengLiu@stu.sufe.edu.cn</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Li%2C+Xinmiao%22">Li, Xinmiao</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> xinmiaoli@126.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Liu%2C+Xipeng%22">Liu, Xipeng</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> axi853@163.com</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Information+Technology+%26+People%22">Information Technology & People</searchLink>. 2026, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p906-933. 28p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reward+%28Psychology%29%22">Reward (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Question+%26+answer+websites%22">Question & answer websites</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+status%22">Social status</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Motivation+%28Psychology%29%22">Motivation (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Incentive+%28Psychology%29%22">Incentive (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-determination+theory%22">Self-determination theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+sharing%22">Information sharing</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Purpose: An in-depth exploration of difference in the motivational effects of various types of feedback can better address the challenges faced by knowledge contributions. Drawing upon the self-determination theory (SDT), this study examines the relative effects of asker monetary rewards and peer comment recognition in the short term, the heterogeneous effects across different social status levels and their long-term impact over time. Design/methodology/approach: Based on panel data from an online financial knowledge Q&A community, this study employs a fixed-effects Poisson regression for empirical analysis. In addition, it also conducts instrumental variable regression and a series of robustness tests. Findings: The results indicate the following: (1) Peer comment recognition has a positive effect on knowledge contributions, whereas asker monetary rewards have a negative impact. (2) In the short-term, the relative effect of asker monetary rewards is stronger, but this effect changes as the social status of the user increases. (3) There is no evidence of an offsetting effect between asker monetary rewards and peer comment recognition. (4) The impact of both asker monetary rewards and peer comment recognition on continuous knowledge contributions decreases over time, but the influence of the latter lasts longer. Originality/value: Previous studies on monetary rewards and peer recognition have focused primarily on their direct effects. This research explores the differences in external incentives by examining the sources, types and timing of feedback, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms that drive continuous knowledge contribution. It also offers a more valuable insights for the management of knowledge Q&A communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Information Technology & People is the property of Emerald Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=192012965 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 28 StartPage: 906 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Reward (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Question & answer websites Type: general – SubjectFull: Social status Type: general – SubjectFull: Motivation (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Incentive (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Self-determination theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Information sharing Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Monetary rewards or comment recognition? The difference between the two types of feedback in online Q&A community. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Liu, Jinpeng – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Li, Xinmiao – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Liu, Xipeng IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: 2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 09593845 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 39 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Information Technology & People Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |