View in EDS

Perceptions of Undergraduate Engineering Students of Two Approaches to Teaching Engineering Ethics: A Case Study.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Perceptions of Undergraduate Engineering Students of Two Approaches to Teaching Engineering Ethics: A Case Study.
Authors: LAWSON, WESLEY1 lawson@umd.edu, SMITH, GIDEON1
Source: International Journal of Engineering Education. 2026, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p160-169. 10p.
Subjects: Engineering ethics, Teaching methods, Risk assessment, Self-efficacy, Psychology of students, Sociotechnical systems, University of Maryland at College Park, Undergraduate education
Abstract: In this paper, we present and evaluate student impressions of two distinct versions of an undergraduate professional ethics course taught in the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department at the University of Maryland. One version has been taught by senior electrical engineering professors and follows a "traditional" approach to professional engineering ethics. The other version teaches the course through a Sociotechnical Systems (STS) lens and relies on the use of STS postures (STSP). In an attempt to understand which approach was more effective at transmitting the required knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) to the students, a survey given to students who have taken either version of the course probed students' opinions about the importance of the course overall and about several key concepts. The survey also queried the students' self-efficacy as to whether they had the tools necessary to resolve different situations ethically. The traditional cohort had 64 respondents while the STSP cohort had 31 respondents. Both cohorts recognized the importance of risk analysis and professional codes of ethics, but generally, students in the "traditional" class felt more positive about the focus of the course and about their ability to resolve situations ethically. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Engineering Education is the property of Tempus Publications and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 192293061
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Perceptions of Undergraduate Engineering Students of Two Approaches to Teaching Engineering Ethics: A Case Study.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22LAWSON%2C+WESLEY%22">LAWSON, WESLEY</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> lawson@umd.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22SMITH%2C+GIDEON%22">SMITH, GIDEON</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22International+Journal+of+Engineering+Education%22">International Journal of Engineering Education</searchLink>. 2026, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p160-169. 10p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+ethics%22">Engineering ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+methods%22">Teaching methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Risk+assessment%22">Risk assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-efficacy%22">Self-efficacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+of+students%22">Psychology of students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sociotechnical+systems%22">Sociotechnical systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22University+of+Maryland+at+College+Park%22">University of Maryland at College Park</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+education%22">Undergraduate education</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: In this paper, we present and evaluate student impressions of two distinct versions of an undergraduate professional ethics course taught in the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department at the University of Maryland. One version has been taught by senior electrical engineering professors and follows a "traditional" approach to professional engineering ethics. The other version teaches the course through a Sociotechnical Systems (STS) lens and relies on the use of STS postures (STSP). In an attempt to understand which approach was more effective at transmitting the required knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) to the students, a survey given to students who have taken either version of the course probed students' opinions about the importance of the course overall and about several key concepts. The survey also queried the students' self-efficacy as to whether they had the tools necessary to resolve different situations ethically. The traditional cohort had 64 respondents while the STSP cohort had 31 respondents. Both cohorts recognized the importance of risk analysis and professional codes of ethics, but generally, students in the "traditional" class felt more positive about the focus of the course and about their ability to resolve situations ethically. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of International Journal of Engineering Education is the property of Tempus Publications and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=192293061
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 160
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Engineering ethics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Risk assessment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self-efficacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychology of students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sociotechnical systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: University of Maryland at College Park
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Undergraduate education
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Perceptions of Undergraduate Engineering Students of Two Approaches to Teaching Engineering Ethics: A Case Study.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: LAWSON, WESLEY
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: SMITH, GIDEON
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: 2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0949149X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 42
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: International Journal of Engineering Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1