View in EDS

Statistically significant chuckles: who is using humour at scientific conferences?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Statistically significant chuckles: who is using humour at scientific conferences?
Authors: Mammola, Stefano1,2,3 (AUTHOR) stefano.mammola@cnr.it, Fontaneto, Diego1,3 (AUTHOR) diego.fontaneto@cnr.it; diego.fontaneto@gmail.com, Santangeli, Andrea4,5 (AUTHOR) andrea.santangeli@helsinki.fi, Oswald, Krista Natasha6 (AUTHOR) knoswald@gmail.com, Correia, Ricardo7,8,9 (AUTHOR) ricardo.henriquescorreia@utu.fi, Meierhofer, Melissa B.2,10 (AUTHOR) meierhoferm02@gmail.com, De Santis, Vanessa11 (AUTHOR) vanessa.desantis@cnr.it, Stout, Victoria12 (AUTHOR) vitadoriacomedy@gmail.com
Source: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 3/18/2026, Vol. 293 Issue 2067, p1-7. 7p.
Subjects: Wit & humor, Science conferences, Face-to-face communication, Gender differences (Sociology), Prejudices, Audience awareness
Abstract: We've all been there: 11.47, swamped by a long stretch of dense scientific talks at a conference. Six slides into a hyper-technical presentation, the speaker suddenly cracks a joke. The room erupts. Shoulders relax. Minds re-engage. Humour is a powerful but underused tool in scientific communication, often sidelined by academic norms that view levity as unprofessional. Social biases can further shape who feels safe joking without risking credibility. At 14 biology-related conferences, we collected data on humour use across 531 talks. Jokes clustered at the beginnings and ends of talks, with an extra bump in successful jokes midway through. Most jokes (66%) earned only polite chuckles. Humour success was unrelated to the type of joke or form of delivery; however, male speakers told about 0.35 more jokes per talk, and both male and native speakers had a 10% higher probability of eliciting laughter. This suggests how social dynamics influence who feels comfortable using humour and whose jokes resonate with the audience. Until academia reckons with these biases, humour will remain a privilege. Still, for those brave enough or granted the social licence, a well-placed zinger can turn a forgettable talk into one people actually remember—and perhaps even enjoy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences is the property of Royal Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 192348924
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Statistically significant chuckles: who is using humour at scientific conferences?
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mammola%2C+Stefano%22">Mammola, Stefano</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> stefano.mammola@cnr.it</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fontaneto%2C+Diego%22">Fontaneto, Diego</searchLink><relatesTo>1,3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> diego.fontaneto@cnr.it; diego.fontaneto@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Santangeli%2C+Andrea%22">Santangeli, Andrea</searchLink><relatesTo>4,5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> andrea.santangeli@helsinki.fi</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Oswald%2C+Krista+Natasha%22">Oswald, Krista Natasha</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> knoswald@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Correia%2C+Ricardo%22">Correia, Ricardo</searchLink><relatesTo>7,8,9</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> ricardo.henriquescorreia@utu.fi</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Meierhofer%2C+Melissa+B%2E%22">Meierhofer, Melissa B.</searchLink><relatesTo>2,10</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> meierhoferm02@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22De+Santis%2C+Vanessa%22">De Santis, Vanessa</searchLink><relatesTo>11</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> vanessa.desantis@cnr.it</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stout%2C+Victoria%22">Stout, Victoria</searchLink><relatesTo>12</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> vitadoriacomedy@gmail.com</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Proceedings+of+the+Royal+Society+B%3A+Biological+Sciences%22">Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences</searchLink>. 3/18/2026, Vol. 293 Issue 2067, p1-7. 7p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Wit+%26+humor%22">Wit & humor</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+conferences%22">Science conferences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Face-to-face+communication%22">Face-to-face communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gender+differences+%28Sociology%29%22">Gender differences (Sociology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prejudices%22">Prejudices</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Audience+awareness%22">Audience awareness</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: We've all been there: 11.47, swamped by a long stretch of dense scientific talks at a conference. Six slides into a hyper-technical presentation, the speaker suddenly cracks a joke. The room erupts. Shoulders relax. Minds re-engage. Humour is a powerful but underused tool in scientific communication, often sidelined by academic norms that view levity as unprofessional. Social biases can further shape who feels safe joking without risking credibility. At 14 biology-related conferences, we collected data on humour use across 531 talks. Jokes clustered at the beginnings and ends of talks, with an extra bump in successful jokes midway through. Most jokes (66%) earned only polite chuckles. Humour success was unrelated to the type of joke or form of delivery; however, male speakers told about 0.35 more jokes per talk, and both male and native speakers had a 10% higher probability of eliciting laughter. This suggests how social dynamics influence who feels comfortable using humour and whose jokes resonate with the audience. Until academia reckons with these biases, humour will remain a privilege. Still, for those brave enough or granted the social licence, a well-placed zinger can turn a forgettable talk into one people actually remember—and perhaps even enjoy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences is the property of Royal Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=192348924
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1098/rspb.2025.3000
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Wit & humor
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Science conferences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Face-to-face communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Gender differences (Sociology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Prejudices
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Audience awareness
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Statistically significant chuckles: who is using humour at scientific conferences?
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mammola, Stefano
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fontaneto, Diego
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Santangeli, Andrea
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Oswald, Krista Natasha
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Correia, Ricardo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Meierhofer, Melissa B.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: De Santis, Vanessa
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stout, Victoria
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 18
              M: 03
              Text: 3/18/2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09628452
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 293
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2067
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
              Type: main
ResultId 1