View in EDS

Which Maker and STEAM integration styles stand out in education? A systematic review of pedagogical practices in teacher education.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Which Maker and STEAM integration styles stand out in education? A systematic review of pedagogical practices in teacher education.
Authors: Calheiro, Lisiane Barcellos1 (AUTHOR), Greca, Ileana M.2 (AUTHOR) imgreca@ubu.es
Source: International Journal of Technology & Design Education. Apr2026, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p951-981. 31p.
Subjects: Maker movement, STEAM education, Teacher education, Teaching methods, Interdisciplinary education, In-service training of teachers
Abstract: The growing demand to prepare teachers to face 21st-century educational challenges has driven the adoption of active methodologies, including the integration of STE(A)M education and the Maker model. These approaches foster critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration through practical skills and interdisciplinary experimentation. This study systematically reviews the literature to identify styles of Maker model integration in science teacher education at the basic education level, as well as challenges and strategies for its implementation. The analysis revealed a predominance of the collaborative style, followed by subordinate and peripheral approaches. Most studies reported positive impacts on teaching confidence, technical skills, and interest in innovative pedagogical practices. However, challenges such as limited curriculum time, restricted access to resources, and the need for continuous training hinder effective implementation. Additionally, the Maker model remains underrepresented in developing countries, highlighting the need for further research across diverse cultural and economic contexts. Integrating the Maker model with STE(A)M education significantly enhances teacher training, fostering a more dynamic and innovative learning environment. However, successful implementation requires institutional support, curriculum alignment, and ongoing professional development. The study underscores that different integration styles—collaborative, peripheral, and subordinate—must be adapted to teachers' needs and educational systems. While findings are promising, broader analyses are needed to strengthen the empirical foundation on the impact of these methodologies in basic education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Technology & Design Education is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 192418128
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Which Maker and STEAM integration styles stand out in education? A systematic review of pedagogical practices in teacher education.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Calheiro%2C+Lisiane+Barcellos%22">Calheiro, Lisiane Barcellos</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Greca%2C+Ileana+M%2E%22">Greca, Ileana M.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> imgreca@ubu.es</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22International+Journal+of+Technology+%26+Design+Education%22">International Journal of Technology & Design Education</searchLink>. Apr2026, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p951-981. 31p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Maker+movement%22">Maker movement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22STEAM+education%22">STEAM education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+education%22">Teacher education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+methods%22">Teaching methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interdisciplinary+education%22">Interdisciplinary education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22In-service+training+of+teachers%22">In-service training of teachers</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The growing demand to prepare teachers to face 21st-century educational challenges has driven the adoption of active methodologies, including the integration of STE(A)M education and the Maker model. These approaches foster critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration through practical skills and interdisciplinary experimentation. This study systematically reviews the literature to identify styles of Maker model integration in science teacher education at the basic education level, as well as challenges and strategies for its implementation. The analysis revealed a predominance of the collaborative style, followed by subordinate and peripheral approaches. Most studies reported positive impacts on teaching confidence, technical skills, and interest in innovative pedagogical practices. However, challenges such as limited curriculum time, restricted access to resources, and the need for continuous training hinder effective implementation. Additionally, the Maker model remains underrepresented in developing countries, highlighting the need for further research across diverse cultural and economic contexts. Integrating the Maker model with STE(A)M education significantly enhances teacher training, fostering a more dynamic and innovative learning environment. However, successful implementation requires institutional support, curriculum alignment, and ongoing professional development. The study underscores that different integration styles—collaborative, peripheral, and subordinate—must be adapted to teachers' needs and educational systems. While findings are promising, broader analyses are needed to strengthen the empirical foundation on the impact of these methodologies in basic education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of International Journal of Technology & Design Education is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=192418128
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10798-025-10017-y
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 31
        StartPage: 951
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Maker movement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: STEAM education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interdisciplinary education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: In-service training of teachers
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Which Maker and STEAM integration styles stand out in education? A systematic review of pedagogical practices in teacher education.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Calheiro, Lisiane Barcellos
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Greca, Ileana M.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Text: Apr2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09577572
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 36
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: International Journal of Technology & Design Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1